Cargando…

Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT‐AF and PREVAIL Studies

BACKGROUND: The PROTECT‐AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) and PREVAIL (Evaluation of the Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) trials demonstrated noninferio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brouwer, Tom F., Whang, William, Kuroki, Kenji, Halperin, Jonathan L., Reddy, Vivek Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013525
_version_ 1783479579345682432
author Brouwer, Tom F.
Whang, William
Kuroki, Kenji
Halperin, Jonathan L.
Reddy, Vivek Y.
author_facet Brouwer, Tom F.
Whang, William
Kuroki, Kenji
Halperin, Jonathan L.
Reddy, Vivek Y.
author_sort Brouwer, Tom F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The PROTECT‐AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) and PREVAIL (Evaluation of the Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) trials demonstrated noninferiority of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) to warfarin for the composite end point of stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular death. This study aims to quantify the net clinical benefit (NCB) of LAAC versus warfarin, accounting for differences in clinical impact of different event types. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the PROTECT‐AF and PREVAIL trials, which randomized atrial fibrillation patients to LAAC or warfarin in a 2:1 fashion. The trials enrolled patients in the United States and Europe between 2005 and 2012 with paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation and CHADS (2) risk scores ≥1. Relative to an index weight for death (1.0), events were assigned weights based on their disabling effect: (1) stroke event weights were based on modified Rankin scores in the base case analyses, and (2) major bleed (0.05) and pericardial effusion (0.05). NCB was calculated as the sum of weight‐adjusted events per 100 patient‐years. Among 1114 randomized subjects, the NCB of LAAC was 1.42% per year (95% CI 0.01–2.82, P=0.04) and a relative risk of 0.74 (95% CI 0.56–1.00). NCB point estimates favored warfarin early in follow‐up, but trended in favor of LAAC after 1 to 2 years. The benefit of LAAC was preserved across subgroups, with particular benefit observed in the subgroup of prior stroke and without diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates long‐term NCB of LAAC with Watchman over warfarin therapy, as the upfront risk of periprocedural events is counterbalanced over time by reduced bleeding events and mortality. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UR: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01182441 and NCT00129545.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6912972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69129722019-12-23 Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT‐AF and PREVAIL Studies Brouwer, Tom F. Whang, William Kuroki, Kenji Halperin, Jonathan L. Reddy, Vivek Y. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The PROTECT‐AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) and PREVAIL (Evaluation of the Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) trials demonstrated noninferiority of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) to warfarin for the composite end point of stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular death. This study aims to quantify the net clinical benefit (NCB) of LAAC versus warfarin, accounting for differences in clinical impact of different event types. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the PROTECT‐AF and PREVAIL trials, which randomized atrial fibrillation patients to LAAC or warfarin in a 2:1 fashion. The trials enrolled patients in the United States and Europe between 2005 and 2012 with paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation and CHADS (2) risk scores ≥1. Relative to an index weight for death (1.0), events were assigned weights based on their disabling effect: (1) stroke event weights were based on modified Rankin scores in the base case analyses, and (2) major bleed (0.05) and pericardial effusion (0.05). NCB was calculated as the sum of weight‐adjusted events per 100 patient‐years. Among 1114 randomized subjects, the NCB of LAAC was 1.42% per year (95% CI 0.01–2.82, P=0.04) and a relative risk of 0.74 (95% CI 0.56–1.00). NCB point estimates favored warfarin early in follow‐up, but trended in favor of LAAC after 1 to 2 years. The benefit of LAAC was preserved across subgroups, with particular benefit observed in the subgroup of prior stroke and without diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates long‐term NCB of LAAC with Watchman over warfarin therapy, as the upfront risk of periprocedural events is counterbalanced over time by reduced bleeding events and mortality. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UR: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01182441 and NCT00129545. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6912972/ /pubmed/31752643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013525 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Brouwer, Tom F.
Whang, William
Kuroki, Kenji
Halperin, Jonathan L.
Reddy, Vivek Y.
Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT‐AF and PREVAIL Studies
title Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT‐AF and PREVAIL Studies
title_full Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT‐AF and PREVAIL Studies
title_fullStr Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT‐AF and PREVAIL Studies
title_full_unstemmed Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT‐AF and PREVAIL Studies
title_short Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT‐AF and PREVAIL Studies
title_sort net clinical benefit of left atrial appendage closure versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a pooled analysis of the randomized protect‐af and prevail studies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013525
work_keys_str_mv AT brouwertomf netclinicalbenefitofleftatrialappendageclosureversuswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationapooledanalysisoftherandomizedprotectafandprevailstudies
AT whangwilliam netclinicalbenefitofleftatrialappendageclosureversuswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationapooledanalysisoftherandomizedprotectafandprevailstudies
AT kurokikenji netclinicalbenefitofleftatrialappendageclosureversuswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationapooledanalysisoftherandomizedprotectafandprevailstudies
AT halperinjonathanl netclinicalbenefitofleftatrialappendageclosureversuswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationapooledanalysisoftherandomizedprotectafandprevailstudies
AT reddyviveky netclinicalbenefitofleftatrialappendageclosureversuswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationapooledanalysisoftherandomizedprotectafandprevailstudies