Cargando…

Color-coded duplex sonography vs. 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery: A prospective cohort study

Hemodynamic changes may provide important information for clinical decision-making in internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The degree of stenosis is responsible for the hemodynamic changes. For detection of intracranial stenosis, each diagnostic method has its own advantages and disadvantages. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Lu, Chu, Wen, Wang, Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885696
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8255
_version_ 1783479644048064512
author Xiao, Lu
Chu, Wen
Wang, Hua
author_facet Xiao, Lu
Chu, Wen
Wang, Hua
author_sort Xiao, Lu
collection PubMed
description Hemodynamic changes may provide important information for clinical decision-making in internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The degree of stenosis is responsible for the hemodynamic changes. For detection of intracranial stenosis, each diagnostic method has its own advantages and disadvantages. The goal of the present study was to compare the sensitivity and accuracy of color-coded duplex sonography with that of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the detection of intracranial stenosis. Patients with 3 vessels and/or left stem coronary artery disease were subjected to transcranial and extracranial color-coded duplex sonography (n=998), MRA (n=998) and invasive catheter angiography (n=939). The degree of stenosis was defined according to the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease methodology. A ≥50% reduction in artery diameter was considered as a positive obstructive lesion. The benefits of each imaging method were assessed by clinical decision-making analysis. Color-coded duplex sonography and MRA, had sensitivities of 0.935 and 0.957 and accuracies of 0.92 and 0.974, respectively, when using invasive catheter angiography as a gold standard. The number of false-positive obstructive lesions detected by MRA was significantly higher than that for color-coded duplex sonography (53 vs. 13, P<0.0001). Color-coded duplex sonography was able to detect an obstructive lesion in one single image for ICAs with ≥57% stenosis, while MRA was only capable of detecting an obstructive lesion in one single image for ICAs with ≥80% stenosis. In conclusion, color-coded duplex sonography is a reliable method for the detection of intracranial stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6913323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69133232019-12-29 Color-coded duplex sonography vs. 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery: A prospective cohort study Xiao, Lu Chu, Wen Wang, Hua Exp Ther Med Articles Hemodynamic changes may provide important information for clinical decision-making in internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The degree of stenosis is responsible for the hemodynamic changes. For detection of intracranial stenosis, each diagnostic method has its own advantages and disadvantages. The goal of the present study was to compare the sensitivity and accuracy of color-coded duplex sonography with that of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the detection of intracranial stenosis. Patients with 3 vessels and/or left stem coronary artery disease were subjected to transcranial and extracranial color-coded duplex sonography (n=998), MRA (n=998) and invasive catheter angiography (n=939). The degree of stenosis was defined according to the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease methodology. A ≥50% reduction in artery diameter was considered as a positive obstructive lesion. The benefits of each imaging method were assessed by clinical decision-making analysis. Color-coded duplex sonography and MRA, had sensitivities of 0.935 and 0.957 and accuracies of 0.92 and 0.974, respectively, when using invasive catheter angiography as a gold standard. The number of false-positive obstructive lesions detected by MRA was significantly higher than that for color-coded duplex sonography (53 vs. 13, P<0.0001). Color-coded duplex sonography was able to detect an obstructive lesion in one single image for ICAs with ≥57% stenosis, while MRA was only capable of detecting an obstructive lesion in one single image for ICAs with ≥80% stenosis. In conclusion, color-coded duplex sonography is a reliable method for the detection of intracranial stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease. D.A. Spandidos 2020-01 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6913323/ /pubmed/31885696 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8255 Text en Copyright: © Xiao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Xiao, Lu
Chu, Wen
Wang, Hua
Color-coded duplex sonography vs. 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery: A prospective cohort study
title Color-coded duplex sonography vs. 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery: A prospective cohort study
title_full Color-coded duplex sonography vs. 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery: A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Color-coded duplex sonography vs. 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery: A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Color-coded duplex sonography vs. 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery: A prospective cohort study
title_short Color-coded duplex sonography vs. 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery: A prospective cohort study
title_sort color-coded duplex sonography vs. 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial stenosis of the internal carotid artery: a prospective cohort study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885696
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8255
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaolu colorcodedduplexsonographyvs30teslamagneticresonanceangiographyfordetectionofintracranialstenosisoftheinternalcarotidarteryaprospectivecohortstudy
AT chuwen colorcodedduplexsonographyvs30teslamagneticresonanceangiographyfordetectionofintracranialstenosisoftheinternalcarotidarteryaprospectivecohortstudy
AT wanghua colorcodedduplexsonographyvs30teslamagneticresonanceangiographyfordetectionofintracranialstenosisoftheinternalcarotidarteryaprospectivecohortstudy