Cargando…
Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing relaparotomies are underrepresented in clinical trials. Standard of care, relative outcomes compared to primary laparotomy, and the ideal fascial closure technique are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The ReLap study has three objectives: First, to determine standard of care and g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31851738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isjp.2018.04.004 |
_version_ | 1783479660308332544 |
---|---|
author | Tran, Dinh Thien-An Doerr-Harim, Colette Hüttner, Felix J. Harnoss, Julian C. Knebel, Phillip Schneider, Martin Büchler, Markus W. Diener, Markus K. Probst, Pascal |
author_facet | Tran, Dinh Thien-An Doerr-Harim, Colette Hüttner, Felix J. Harnoss, Julian C. Knebel, Phillip Schneider, Martin Büchler, Markus W. Diener, Markus K. Probst, Pascal |
author_sort | Tran, Dinh Thien-An |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing relaparotomies are underrepresented in clinical trials. Standard of care, relative outcomes compared to primary laparotomy, and the ideal fascial closure technique are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The ReLap study has three objectives: First, to determine standard of care and gain evidence of intra-/postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing relaparotomy compared to patients undergoing primary laparotomy. Second, to gain evidence of an association between biomarkers and adhesion grade in a clinical-translational approach in patients undergoing relaparotomy or primary laparotomy. Third, to gain evidence of the feasibility and comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy using the small stitches technique with Monomax 2–0 versus the large stitches technique with PDS 1 loop. METHODS: The ReLap study is a monocentric, prospective, mixed-methods, exploratory study with three steps: health care research, translational research, and randomized controlled trial. All patients scheduled for elective laparotomies or relaparotomies at the University of Heidelberg will be screened for eligibility. There will be five study visits during the hospital stay and one study visit one year after surgery. The clinical course will be followed and outcomes necessary to answer the study objectives will be captured prospectively. Relaparotomy patients eligible for closure with the small and large stitches technique will be randomized intraoperatively to one technique. DISCUSSION: The ReLap study will bridge a significant knowledge gap regarding patients undergoing relaparotomy. Differences in the standard of care between relaparotomies and primary laparotomies will be determined. The relation between biomarkers and manifestation of adhesions will be explored and evidence for the comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy will be gained. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6913562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69135622019-12-17 Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001) Tran, Dinh Thien-An Doerr-Harim, Colette Hüttner, Felix J. Harnoss, Julian C. Knebel, Phillip Schneider, Martin Büchler, Markus W. Diener, Markus K. Probst, Pascal Int J Surg Protoc Research Paper BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing relaparotomies are underrepresented in clinical trials. Standard of care, relative outcomes compared to primary laparotomy, and the ideal fascial closure technique are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The ReLap study has three objectives: First, to determine standard of care and gain evidence of intra-/postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing relaparotomy compared to patients undergoing primary laparotomy. Second, to gain evidence of an association between biomarkers and adhesion grade in a clinical-translational approach in patients undergoing relaparotomy or primary laparotomy. Third, to gain evidence of the feasibility and comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy using the small stitches technique with Monomax 2–0 versus the large stitches technique with PDS 1 loop. METHODS: The ReLap study is a monocentric, prospective, mixed-methods, exploratory study with three steps: health care research, translational research, and randomized controlled trial. All patients scheduled for elective laparotomies or relaparotomies at the University of Heidelberg will be screened for eligibility. There will be five study visits during the hospital stay and one study visit one year after surgery. The clinical course will be followed and outcomes necessary to answer the study objectives will be captured prospectively. Relaparotomy patients eligible for closure with the small and large stitches technique will be randomized intraoperatively to one technique. DISCUSSION: The ReLap study will bridge a significant knowledge gap regarding patients undergoing relaparotomy. Differences in the standard of care between relaparotomies and primary laparotomies will be determined. The relation between biomarkers and manifestation of adhesions will be explored and evidence for the comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy will be gained. Elsevier 2018-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6913562/ /pubmed/31851738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isjp.2018.04.004 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Tran, Dinh Thien-An Doerr-Harim, Colette Hüttner, Felix J. Harnoss, Julian C. Knebel, Phillip Schneider, Martin Büchler, Markus W. Diener, Markus K. Probst, Pascal Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001) |
title | Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001) |
title_full | Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001) |
title_fullStr | Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001) |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001) |
title_short | Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001) |
title_sort | prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (relap study; drks00013001) |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31851738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isjp.2018.04.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trandinhthienan prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001 AT doerrharimcolette prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001 AT huttnerfelixj prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001 AT harnossjulianc prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001 AT knebelphillip prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001 AT schneidermartin prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001 AT buchlermarkusw prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001 AT dienermarkusk prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001 AT probstpascal prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001 |