Cargando…

Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing relaparotomies are underrepresented in clinical trials. Standard of care, relative outcomes compared to primary laparotomy, and the ideal fascial closure technique are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The ReLap study has three objectives: First, to determine standard of care and g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, Dinh Thien-An, Doerr-Harim, Colette, Hüttner, Felix J., Harnoss, Julian C., Knebel, Phillip, Schneider, Martin, Büchler, Markus W., Diener, Markus K., Probst, Pascal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31851738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isjp.2018.04.004
_version_ 1783479660308332544
author Tran, Dinh Thien-An
Doerr-Harim, Colette
Hüttner, Felix J.
Harnoss, Julian C.
Knebel, Phillip
Schneider, Martin
Büchler, Markus W.
Diener, Markus K.
Probst, Pascal
author_facet Tran, Dinh Thien-An
Doerr-Harim, Colette
Hüttner, Felix J.
Harnoss, Julian C.
Knebel, Phillip
Schneider, Martin
Büchler, Markus W.
Diener, Markus K.
Probst, Pascal
author_sort Tran, Dinh Thien-An
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing relaparotomies are underrepresented in clinical trials. Standard of care, relative outcomes compared to primary laparotomy, and the ideal fascial closure technique are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The ReLap study has three objectives: First, to determine standard of care and gain evidence of intra-/postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing relaparotomy compared to patients undergoing primary laparotomy. Second, to gain evidence of an association between biomarkers and adhesion grade in a clinical-translational approach in patients undergoing relaparotomy or primary laparotomy. Third, to gain evidence of the feasibility and comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy using the small stitches technique with Monomax 2–0 versus the large stitches technique with PDS 1 loop. METHODS: The ReLap study is a monocentric, prospective, mixed-methods, exploratory study with three steps: health care research, translational research, and randomized controlled trial. All patients scheduled for elective laparotomies or relaparotomies at the University of Heidelberg will be screened for eligibility. There will be five study visits during the hospital stay and one study visit one year after surgery. The clinical course will be followed and outcomes necessary to answer the study objectives will be captured prospectively. Relaparotomy patients eligible for closure with the small and large stitches technique will be randomized intraoperatively to one technique. DISCUSSION: The ReLap study will bridge a significant knowledge gap regarding patients undergoing relaparotomy. Differences in the standard of care between relaparotomies and primary laparotomies will be determined. The relation between biomarkers and manifestation of adhesions will be explored and evidence for the comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy will be gained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6913562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69135622019-12-17 Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001) Tran, Dinh Thien-An Doerr-Harim, Colette Hüttner, Felix J. Harnoss, Julian C. Knebel, Phillip Schneider, Martin Büchler, Markus W. Diener, Markus K. Probst, Pascal Int J Surg Protoc Research Paper BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing relaparotomies are underrepresented in clinical trials. Standard of care, relative outcomes compared to primary laparotomy, and the ideal fascial closure technique are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The ReLap study has three objectives: First, to determine standard of care and gain evidence of intra-/postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing relaparotomy compared to patients undergoing primary laparotomy. Second, to gain evidence of an association between biomarkers and adhesion grade in a clinical-translational approach in patients undergoing relaparotomy or primary laparotomy. Third, to gain evidence of the feasibility and comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy using the small stitches technique with Monomax 2–0 versus the large stitches technique with PDS 1 loop. METHODS: The ReLap study is a monocentric, prospective, mixed-methods, exploratory study with three steps: health care research, translational research, and randomized controlled trial. All patients scheduled for elective laparotomies or relaparotomies at the University of Heidelberg will be screened for eligibility. There will be five study visits during the hospital stay and one study visit one year after surgery. The clinical course will be followed and outcomes necessary to answer the study objectives will be captured prospectively. Relaparotomy patients eligible for closure with the small and large stitches technique will be randomized intraoperatively to one technique. DISCUSSION: The ReLap study will bridge a significant knowledge gap regarding patients undergoing relaparotomy. Differences in the standard of care between relaparotomies and primary laparotomies will be determined. The relation between biomarkers and manifestation of adhesions will be explored and evidence for the comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy will be gained. Elsevier 2018-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6913562/ /pubmed/31851738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isjp.2018.04.004 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Tran, Dinh Thien-An
Doerr-Harim, Colette
Hüttner, Felix J.
Harnoss, Julian C.
Knebel, Phillip
Schneider, Martin
Büchler, Markus W.
Diener, Markus K.
Probst, Pascal
Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)
title Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)
title_full Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)
title_fullStr Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)
title_full_unstemmed Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)
title_short Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)
title_sort prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (relap study; drks00013001)
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31851738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isjp.2018.04.004
work_keys_str_mv AT trandinhthienan prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001
AT doerrharimcolette prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001
AT huttnerfelixj prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001
AT harnossjulianc prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001
AT knebelphillip prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001
AT schneidermartin prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001
AT buchlermarkusw prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001
AT dienermarkusk prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001
AT probstpascal prospectivemixedmethodsstudyofpatientsundergoingrelaparotomyrelapstudydrks00013001