Cargando…
Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers
The diagnosis of brain death (BD) is legally and medically accepted. Recently, several high-profile cases have led to discussions regarding the integrity of current criteria, and many physiologic problems have been identified to support the necessity for their reevaluation. These include a global va...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
YJBM
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866791 |
_version_ | 1783479702727426048 |
---|---|
author | Rayner, Molly Mansoor, Maha Holt, Tanya Hansen, Gregory |
author_facet | Rayner, Molly Mansoor, Maha Holt, Tanya Hansen, Gregory |
author_sort | Rayner, Molly |
collection | PubMed |
description | The diagnosis of brain death (BD) is legally and medically accepted. Recently, several high-profile cases have led to discussions regarding the integrity of current criteria, and many physiologic problems have been identified to support the necessity for their reevaluation. These include a global variability of the criteria, the suggestion of a clinical “hierarchy,” and the resultant approximation of BD. Further ambiguity has been exposed through case reports of reversible BD, and an inconsistent understanding from physicians who are viewed as experts in this domain. Meeting BD criteria clearly does not equate to a physiologic “death” of the brain, and a greater community perspective should be considered as the dialogue moves forward. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6913809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | YJBM |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69138092019-12-20 Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers Rayner, Molly Mansoor, Maha Holt, Tanya Hansen, Gregory Yale J Biol Med Perspectives The diagnosis of brain death (BD) is legally and medically accepted. Recently, several high-profile cases have led to discussions regarding the integrity of current criteria, and many physiologic problems have been identified to support the necessity for their reevaluation. These include a global variability of the criteria, the suggestion of a clinical “hierarchy,” and the resultant approximation of BD. Further ambiguity has been exposed through case reports of reversible BD, and an inconsistent understanding from physicians who are viewed as experts in this domain. Meeting BD criteria clearly does not equate to a physiologic “death” of the brain, and a greater community perspective should be considered as the dialogue moves forward. YJBM 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6913809/ /pubmed/31866791 Text en Copyright ©2019, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-NC license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Perspectives Rayner, Molly Mansoor, Maha Holt, Tanya Hansen, Gregory Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers |
title | Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers |
title_full | Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers |
title_fullStr | Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers |
title_short | Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers |
title_sort | brain death criteria: medical dogma and outliers |
topic | Perspectives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866791 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raynermolly braindeathcriteriamedicaldogmaandoutliers AT mansoormaha braindeathcriteriamedicaldogmaandoutliers AT holttanya braindeathcriteriamedicaldogmaandoutliers AT hansengregory braindeathcriteriamedicaldogmaandoutliers |