Cargando…

Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers

The diagnosis of brain death (BD) is legally and medically accepted. Recently, several high-profile cases have led to discussions regarding the integrity of current criteria, and many physiologic problems have been identified to support the necessity for their reevaluation. These include a global va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rayner, Molly, Mansoor, Maha, Holt, Tanya, Hansen, Gregory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: YJBM 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866791
_version_ 1783479702727426048
author Rayner, Molly
Mansoor, Maha
Holt, Tanya
Hansen, Gregory
author_facet Rayner, Molly
Mansoor, Maha
Holt, Tanya
Hansen, Gregory
author_sort Rayner, Molly
collection PubMed
description The diagnosis of brain death (BD) is legally and medically accepted. Recently, several high-profile cases have led to discussions regarding the integrity of current criteria, and many physiologic problems have been identified to support the necessity for their reevaluation. These include a global variability of the criteria, the suggestion of a clinical “hierarchy,” and the resultant approximation of BD. Further ambiguity has been exposed through case reports of reversible BD, and an inconsistent understanding from physicians who are viewed as experts in this domain. Meeting BD criteria clearly does not equate to a physiologic “death” of the brain, and a greater community perspective should be considered as the dialogue moves forward.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6913809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher YJBM
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69138092019-12-20 Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers Rayner, Molly Mansoor, Maha Holt, Tanya Hansen, Gregory Yale J Biol Med Perspectives The diagnosis of brain death (BD) is legally and medically accepted. Recently, several high-profile cases have led to discussions regarding the integrity of current criteria, and many physiologic problems have been identified to support the necessity for their reevaluation. These include a global variability of the criteria, the suggestion of a clinical “hierarchy,” and the resultant approximation of BD. Further ambiguity has been exposed through case reports of reversible BD, and an inconsistent understanding from physicians who are viewed as experts in this domain. Meeting BD criteria clearly does not equate to a physiologic “death” of the brain, and a greater community perspective should be considered as the dialogue moves forward. YJBM 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6913809/ /pubmed/31866791 Text en Copyright ©2019, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-NC license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Perspectives
Rayner, Molly
Mansoor, Maha
Holt, Tanya
Hansen, Gregory
Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers
title Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers
title_full Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers
title_fullStr Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers
title_full_unstemmed Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers
title_short Brain Death Criteria: Medical Dogma and Outliers
title_sort brain death criteria: medical dogma and outliers
topic Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866791
work_keys_str_mv AT raynermolly braindeathcriteriamedicaldogmaandoutliers
AT mansoormaha braindeathcriteriamedicaldogmaandoutliers
AT holttanya braindeathcriteriamedicaldogmaandoutliers
AT hansengregory braindeathcriteriamedicaldogmaandoutliers