Cargando…

Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration

Body ownership relies on spatiotemporal correlations between multisensory signals and visual cues specifying oneself such as body form and orientation. The mechanism for the integration of bodily signals remains unclear. One approach to model multisensory integration that has been influential in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smit, Sophie, Rich, Anina N., Zopf, Regine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31841510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224174
_version_ 1783479718404685824
author Smit, Sophie
Rich, Anina N.
Zopf, Regine
author_facet Smit, Sophie
Rich, Anina N.
Zopf, Regine
author_sort Smit, Sophie
collection PubMed
description Body ownership relies on spatiotemporal correlations between multisensory signals and visual cues specifying oneself such as body form and orientation. The mechanism for the integration of bodily signals remains unclear. One approach to model multisensory integration that has been influential in the multisensory literature is Bayesian causal inference. This specifies that the brain integrates spatial and temporal signals coming from different modalities when it infers a common cause for inputs. As an example, the rubber hand illusion shows that visual form and orientation cues can promote the inference of a common cause (one’s body) leading to spatial integration shown by a proprioceptive drift of the perceived location of the real hand towards the rubber hand. Recent studies investigating the effect of visual cues on temporal integration, however, have led to conflicting findings. These could be due to task differences, variation in ecological validity of stimuli and/or small samples. In this pre-registered study, we investigated the influence of visual information on temporal integration using a visuo-tactile temporal order judgement task with realistic stimuli and a sufficiently large sample determined by Bayesian analysis. Participants viewed videos of a touch being applied to plausible or implausible visual stimuli for one’s hand (hand oriented plausibly, hand rotated 180 degrees, or a sponge) while also being touched at varying stimulus onset asynchronies. Participants judged which stimulus came first: viewed or felt touch. Results show that visual cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal order judgements. This is not in line with the idea that bodily signals indicating oneself influence the integration of multisensory signals in the temporal domain. The current study emphasises the importance of rigour in our methodologies and analyses to advance the understanding of how properties of multisensory events affect the encoding of temporal information in the brain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6913941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69139412019-12-27 Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration Smit, Sophie Rich, Anina N. Zopf, Regine PLoS One Research Article Body ownership relies on spatiotemporal correlations between multisensory signals and visual cues specifying oneself such as body form and orientation. The mechanism for the integration of bodily signals remains unclear. One approach to model multisensory integration that has been influential in the multisensory literature is Bayesian causal inference. This specifies that the brain integrates spatial and temporal signals coming from different modalities when it infers a common cause for inputs. As an example, the rubber hand illusion shows that visual form and orientation cues can promote the inference of a common cause (one’s body) leading to spatial integration shown by a proprioceptive drift of the perceived location of the real hand towards the rubber hand. Recent studies investigating the effect of visual cues on temporal integration, however, have led to conflicting findings. These could be due to task differences, variation in ecological validity of stimuli and/or small samples. In this pre-registered study, we investigated the influence of visual information on temporal integration using a visuo-tactile temporal order judgement task with realistic stimuli and a sufficiently large sample determined by Bayesian analysis. Participants viewed videos of a touch being applied to plausible or implausible visual stimuli for one’s hand (hand oriented plausibly, hand rotated 180 degrees, or a sponge) while also being touched at varying stimulus onset asynchronies. Participants judged which stimulus came first: viewed or felt touch. Results show that visual cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal order judgements. This is not in line with the idea that bodily signals indicating oneself influence the integration of multisensory signals in the temporal domain. The current study emphasises the importance of rigour in our methodologies and analyses to advance the understanding of how properties of multisensory events affect the encoding of temporal information in the brain. Public Library of Science 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6913941/ /pubmed/31841510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224174 Text en © 2019 Smit et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smit, Sophie
Rich, Anina N.
Zopf, Regine
Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration
title Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration
title_full Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration
title_fullStr Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration
title_full_unstemmed Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration
title_short Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration
title_sort visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31841510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224174
work_keys_str_mv AT smitsophie visualbodyformandorientationcuesdonotmodulatevisuotactiletemporalintegration
AT richaninan visualbodyformandorientationcuesdonotmodulatevisuotactiletemporalintegration
AT zopfregine visualbodyformandorientationcuesdonotmodulatevisuotactiletemporalintegration