Cargando…

Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting

DNA-based identification through the use of metabarcoding has been proposed as the next step in the monitoring of biological communities, such as those assessed under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Advances have been made in the field of metabarcoding, but challenges remain when using complex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beentjes, Kevin K., Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L., Schilthuizen, Menno, Hoogeveen, Marten, Pastoor, Rob, van der Hoorn, Berry B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31841568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226527
_version_ 1783479724772687872
author Beentjes, Kevin K.
Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L.
Schilthuizen, Menno
Hoogeveen, Marten
Pastoor, Rob
van der Hoorn, Berry B.
author_facet Beentjes, Kevin K.
Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L.
Schilthuizen, Menno
Hoogeveen, Marten
Pastoor, Rob
van der Hoorn, Berry B.
author_sort Beentjes, Kevin K.
collection PubMed
description DNA-based identification through the use of metabarcoding has been proposed as the next step in the monitoring of biological communities, such as those assessed under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Advances have been made in the field of metabarcoding, but challenges remain when using complex samples. Uneven biomass distributions, preferential amplification and reference database deficiencies can all lead to discrepancies between morphological and DNA-based taxa lists. The effects of different taxonomic groups on these issues remain understudied. By metabarcoding WFD monitoring samples, we analyzed six different taxonomic groups of freshwater organisms, both separately and combined. Identifications based on metabarcoding data were compared directly to morphological assessments performed under the WFD. The diversity of taxa for both morphological and DNA-based assessments was similar, although large differences were observed in some samples. The overlap between the two taxon lists was 56.8% on average across all taxa, and was highest for Crustacea, Heteroptera, and Coleoptera, and lowest for Annelida and Mollusca. Taxonomic sorting in six basic groups before DNA extraction and amplification improved taxon recovery by 46.5%. The impact on ecological quality ratio (EQR) scoring was considerable when replacing morphology with DNA-based identifications, but there was a high correlation when only replacing a single taxonomic group with molecular data. Different taxonomic groups provide their own challenges and benefits. Some groups might benefit from a more consistent and robust method of identification. Others present difficulties in molecular processing, due to uneven biomass distributions, large genetic diversity or shortcomings of the reference database. Sorting samples into basic taxonomic groups that require little taxonomic knowledge greatly improves the recovery of taxa with metabarcoding. Current standards for EQR monitoring may not be easily replaced completely with molecular strategies, but the effectiveness of molecular methods opens up the way for a paradigm shift in biomonitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6913968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69139682019-12-27 Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting Beentjes, Kevin K. Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L. Schilthuizen, Menno Hoogeveen, Marten Pastoor, Rob van der Hoorn, Berry B. PLoS One Research Article DNA-based identification through the use of metabarcoding has been proposed as the next step in the monitoring of biological communities, such as those assessed under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Advances have been made in the field of metabarcoding, but challenges remain when using complex samples. Uneven biomass distributions, preferential amplification and reference database deficiencies can all lead to discrepancies between morphological and DNA-based taxa lists. The effects of different taxonomic groups on these issues remain understudied. By metabarcoding WFD monitoring samples, we analyzed six different taxonomic groups of freshwater organisms, both separately and combined. Identifications based on metabarcoding data were compared directly to morphological assessments performed under the WFD. The diversity of taxa for both morphological and DNA-based assessments was similar, although large differences were observed in some samples. The overlap between the two taxon lists was 56.8% on average across all taxa, and was highest for Crustacea, Heteroptera, and Coleoptera, and lowest for Annelida and Mollusca. Taxonomic sorting in six basic groups before DNA extraction and amplification improved taxon recovery by 46.5%. The impact on ecological quality ratio (EQR) scoring was considerable when replacing morphology with DNA-based identifications, but there was a high correlation when only replacing a single taxonomic group with molecular data. Different taxonomic groups provide their own challenges and benefits. Some groups might benefit from a more consistent and robust method of identification. Others present difficulties in molecular processing, due to uneven biomass distributions, large genetic diversity or shortcomings of the reference database. Sorting samples into basic taxonomic groups that require little taxonomic knowledge greatly improves the recovery of taxa with metabarcoding. Current standards for EQR monitoring may not be easily replaced completely with molecular strategies, but the effectiveness of molecular methods opens up the way for a paradigm shift in biomonitoring. Public Library of Science 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6913968/ /pubmed/31841568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226527 Text en © 2019 Beentjes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Beentjes, Kevin K.
Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L.
Schilthuizen, Menno
Hoogeveen, Marten
Pastoor, Rob
van der Hoorn, Berry B.
Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting
title Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting
title_full Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting
title_fullStr Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting
title_full_unstemmed Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting
title_short Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting
title_sort increased performance of dna metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31841568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226527
work_keys_str_mv AT beentjeskevink increasedperformanceofdnametabarcodingofmacroinvertebratesbytaxonomicsorting
AT speksnijderarjengcl increasedperformanceofdnametabarcodingofmacroinvertebratesbytaxonomicsorting
AT schilthuizenmenno increasedperformanceofdnametabarcodingofmacroinvertebratesbytaxonomicsorting
AT hoogeveenmarten increasedperformanceofdnametabarcodingofmacroinvertebratesbytaxonomicsorting
AT pastoorrob increasedperformanceofdnametabarcodingofmacroinvertebratesbytaxonomicsorting
AT vanderhoornberryb increasedperformanceofdnametabarcodingofmacroinvertebratesbytaxonomicsorting