Cargando…

Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom

Natural gas has become the largest fuel source for electricity generation in the United States and accounts for a third of energy production and consumption. However, the environmental and socioeconomic impacts across the supply chain and over the boom-and-bust cycle have not been comprehensively ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayfield, Erin N., Cohon, Jared L., Muller, Nicholas Z., Azevedo, Inês M. L., Robinson, Allen L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6914251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0420-1
_version_ 1783479775892865024
author Mayfield, Erin N.
Cohon, Jared L.
Muller, Nicholas Z.
Azevedo, Inês M. L.
Robinson, Allen L.
author_facet Mayfield, Erin N.
Cohon, Jared L.
Muller, Nicholas Z.
Azevedo, Inês M. L.
Robinson, Allen L.
author_sort Mayfield, Erin N.
collection PubMed
description Natural gas has become the largest fuel source for electricity generation in the United States and accounts for a third of energy production and consumption. However, the environmental and socioeconomic impacts across the supply chain and over the boom-and-bust cycle have not been comprehensively characterized. To provide insight for long-term decision making for energy transitions, we estimate the cumulative impacts of the shale gas boom in the Appalachian basin from 2004 to 2016 on air quality, climate change, and employment. We find that air quality impacts (1200 to 4600 deaths; $23B +99%/−164%) and employment impacts (469,000 job-years ±30%; $21B ±30%) follow the boom-and-bust cycle, while climate impacts ($12B to $94B) persist for generations well beyond the period of natural gas activity. Employment effects concentrate in rural areas where production occurs. However, almost half of cumulative premature mortality due to air pollution is downwind of these areas, occurring in urban regions of the Northeast. The cumulative temperature impacts of methane and carbon dioxide over a 30-year time horizon are nearly equivalent, but over the long term, the cumulative climate impact is largely due to carbon dioxide. We estimate that a tax on production of $2 per thousand cubic foot (+172%/−76%) would compensate for cumulative climate and air quality externalities across the supply chain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6914251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69142512019-12-16 Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom Mayfield, Erin N. Cohon, Jared L. Muller, Nicholas Z. Azevedo, Inês M. L. Robinson, Allen L. Nat Sustain Article Natural gas has become the largest fuel source for electricity generation in the United States and accounts for a third of energy production and consumption. However, the environmental and socioeconomic impacts across the supply chain and over the boom-and-bust cycle have not been comprehensively characterized. To provide insight for long-term decision making for energy transitions, we estimate the cumulative impacts of the shale gas boom in the Appalachian basin from 2004 to 2016 on air quality, climate change, and employment. We find that air quality impacts (1200 to 4600 deaths; $23B +99%/−164%) and employment impacts (469,000 job-years ±30%; $21B ±30%) follow the boom-and-bust cycle, while climate impacts ($12B to $94B) persist for generations well beyond the period of natural gas activity. Employment effects concentrate in rural areas where production occurs. However, almost half of cumulative premature mortality due to air pollution is downwind of these areas, occurring in urban regions of the Northeast. The cumulative temperature impacts of methane and carbon dioxide over a 30-year time horizon are nearly equivalent, but over the long term, the cumulative climate impact is largely due to carbon dioxide. We estimate that a tax on production of $2 per thousand cubic foot (+172%/−76%) would compensate for cumulative climate and air quality externalities across the supply chain. 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6914251/ /pubmed/31844682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0420-1 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Mayfield, Erin N.
Cohon, Jared L.
Muller, Nicholas Z.
Azevedo, Inês M. L.
Robinson, Allen L.
Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom
title Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom
title_full Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom
title_fullStr Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom
title_full_unstemmed Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom
title_short Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom
title_sort cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6914251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0420-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mayfielderinn cumulativeenvironmentalandemploymentimpactsoftheshalegasboom
AT cohonjaredl cumulativeenvironmentalandemploymentimpactsoftheshalegasboom
AT mullernicholasz cumulativeenvironmentalandemploymentimpactsoftheshalegasboom
AT azevedoinesml cumulativeenvironmentalandemploymentimpactsoftheshalegasboom
AT robinsonallenl cumulativeenvironmentalandemploymentimpactsoftheshalegasboom