Cargando…

Accuracy of a Chatbot (Ada) in the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Comparative Case Study With Lay and Expert Users

BACKGROUND: Health apps for the screening and diagnosis of mental disorders have emerged in recent years on various levels (eg, patients, practitioners, and public health system). However, the diagnostic quality of these apps has not been (sufficiently) tested so far. OBJECTIVE: The objective of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jungmann, Stefanie Maria, Klan, Timo, Kuhn, Sebastian, Jungmann, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6914276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31663858
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13863
_version_ 1783479778042445824
author Jungmann, Stefanie Maria
Klan, Timo
Kuhn, Sebastian
Jungmann, Florian
author_facet Jungmann, Stefanie Maria
Klan, Timo
Kuhn, Sebastian
Jungmann, Florian
author_sort Jungmann, Stefanie Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health apps for the screening and diagnosis of mental disorders have emerged in recent years on various levels (eg, patients, practitioners, and public health system). However, the diagnostic quality of these apps has not been (sufficiently) tested so far. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the diagnostic quality of a health app for a broad spectrum of mental disorders and its dependency on expert knowledge. METHODS: Two psychotherapists, two psychology students, and two laypersons each read 20 case vignettes with a broad spectrum of mental disorders. They used a health app (Ada—Your Health Guide) to get a diagnosis by entering the symptoms. Interrater reliabilities were computed between the diagnoses of the case vignettes and the results of the app for each user group. RESULTS: Overall, there was a moderate diagnostic agreement (kappa=0.64) between the results of the app and the case vignettes for mental disorders in adulthood and a low diagnostic agreement (kappa=0.40) for mental disorders in childhood and adolescence. When psychotherapists applied the app, there was a good diagnostic agreement (kappa=0.78) regarding mental disorders in adulthood. The diagnostic agreement was moderate (kappa=0.55/0.60) for students and laypersons. For mental disorders in childhood and adolescence, a moderate diagnostic quality was found when psychotherapists (kappa=0.53) and students (kappa=0.41) used the app, whereas the quality was low for laypersons (kappa=0.29). On average, the app required 34 questions to be answered and 7 min to complete. CONCLUSIONS: The health app investigated here can represent an efficient diagnostic screening or help function for mental disorders in adulthood and has the potential to support especially diagnosticians in their work in various ways. The results of this pilot study provide a first indication that the diagnostic accuracy is user dependent and improvements in the app are needed especially for mental disorders in childhood and adolescence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6914276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69142762020-01-06 Accuracy of a Chatbot (Ada) in the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Comparative Case Study With Lay and Expert Users Jungmann, Stefanie Maria Klan, Timo Kuhn, Sebastian Jungmann, Florian JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Health apps for the screening and diagnosis of mental disorders have emerged in recent years on various levels (eg, patients, practitioners, and public health system). However, the diagnostic quality of these apps has not been (sufficiently) tested so far. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the diagnostic quality of a health app for a broad spectrum of mental disorders and its dependency on expert knowledge. METHODS: Two psychotherapists, two psychology students, and two laypersons each read 20 case vignettes with a broad spectrum of mental disorders. They used a health app (Ada—Your Health Guide) to get a diagnosis by entering the symptoms. Interrater reliabilities were computed between the diagnoses of the case vignettes and the results of the app for each user group. RESULTS: Overall, there was a moderate diagnostic agreement (kappa=0.64) between the results of the app and the case vignettes for mental disorders in adulthood and a low diagnostic agreement (kappa=0.40) for mental disorders in childhood and adolescence. When psychotherapists applied the app, there was a good diagnostic agreement (kappa=0.78) regarding mental disorders in adulthood. The diagnostic agreement was moderate (kappa=0.55/0.60) for students and laypersons. For mental disorders in childhood and adolescence, a moderate diagnostic quality was found when psychotherapists (kappa=0.53) and students (kappa=0.41) used the app, whereas the quality was low for laypersons (kappa=0.29). On average, the app required 34 questions to be answered and 7 min to complete. CONCLUSIONS: The health app investigated here can represent an efficient diagnostic screening or help function for mental disorders in adulthood and has the potential to support especially diagnosticians in their work in various ways. The results of this pilot study provide a first indication that the diagnostic accuracy is user dependent and improvements in the app are needed especially for mental disorders in childhood and adolescence. JMIR Publications 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6914276/ /pubmed/31663858 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13863 Text en ©Stefanie Maria Jungmann, Timo Klan, Sebastian Kuhn, Florian Jungmann. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 29.10.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jungmann, Stefanie Maria
Klan, Timo
Kuhn, Sebastian
Jungmann, Florian
Accuracy of a Chatbot (Ada) in the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Comparative Case Study With Lay and Expert Users
title Accuracy of a Chatbot (Ada) in the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Comparative Case Study With Lay and Expert Users
title_full Accuracy of a Chatbot (Ada) in the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Comparative Case Study With Lay and Expert Users
title_fullStr Accuracy of a Chatbot (Ada) in the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Comparative Case Study With Lay and Expert Users
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of a Chatbot (Ada) in the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Comparative Case Study With Lay and Expert Users
title_short Accuracy of a Chatbot (Ada) in the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Comparative Case Study With Lay and Expert Users
title_sort accuracy of a chatbot (ada) in the diagnosis of mental disorders: comparative case study with lay and expert users
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6914276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31663858
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13863
work_keys_str_mv AT jungmannstefaniemaria accuracyofachatbotadainthediagnosisofmentaldisorderscomparativecasestudywithlayandexpertusers
AT klantimo accuracyofachatbotadainthediagnosisofmentaldisorderscomparativecasestudywithlayandexpertusers
AT kuhnsebastian accuracyofachatbotadainthediagnosisofmentaldisorderscomparativecasestudywithlayandexpertusers
AT jungmannflorian accuracyofachatbotadainthediagnosisofmentaldisorderscomparativecasestudywithlayandexpertusers