Cargando…

Next Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening in the United Kingdom National Health Service

Next generation DNA sequencing (NGS) has the potential to improve the diagnostic and prognostic utility of newborn screening programmes. This study assesses the feasibility of automating NGS on dried blood spot (DBS) DNA in a United Kingdom National Health Service (UK NHS) laboratory. An NGS panel t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Campen, Julia C., Sollars, Elizabeth S. A., Thomas, Rebecca C., Bartlett, Clare M., Milano, Antonio, Parker, Matthew D., Dawe, Jennifer, Winship, Peter R., Peck, Gerrard, Grafham, Darren, Kirk, Richard J., Bonham, James R., Goodeve, Anne C., Dalton, Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6914376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844782
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns5040040
_version_ 1783479793311809536
author van Campen, Julia C.
Sollars, Elizabeth S. A.
Thomas, Rebecca C.
Bartlett, Clare M.
Milano, Antonio
Parker, Matthew D.
Dawe, Jennifer
Winship, Peter R.
Peck, Gerrard
Grafham, Darren
Kirk, Richard J.
Bonham, James R.
Goodeve, Anne C.
Dalton, Ann
author_facet van Campen, Julia C.
Sollars, Elizabeth S. A.
Thomas, Rebecca C.
Bartlett, Clare M.
Milano, Antonio
Parker, Matthew D.
Dawe, Jennifer
Winship, Peter R.
Peck, Gerrard
Grafham, Darren
Kirk, Richard J.
Bonham, James R.
Goodeve, Anne C.
Dalton, Ann
author_sort van Campen, Julia C.
collection PubMed
description Next generation DNA sequencing (NGS) has the potential to improve the diagnostic and prognostic utility of newborn screening programmes. This study assesses the feasibility of automating NGS on dried blood spot (DBS) DNA in a United Kingdom National Health Service (UK NHS) laboratory. An NGS panel targeting the entire coding sequence of five genes relevant to disorders currently screened for in newborns in the UK was validated on DBS DNA. An automated process for DNA extraction, NGS and bioinformatics analysis was developed. The process was tested on DBS to determine feasibility, turnaround time and cost. The analytical sensitivity of the assay was 100% and analytical specificity was 99.96%, with a mean 99.5% concordance of variant calls between DBS and venous blood samples in regions with ≥30× coverage (96.8% across all regions; all variant calls were single nucleotide variants (SNVs), with indel performance not assessed). The pipeline enabled processing of up to 1000 samples a week with a turnaround time of four days from receipt of sample to reporting. This study concluded that it is feasible to automate targeted NGS on routine DBS samples in a UK NHS laboratory setting, but it may not currently be cost effective as a first line test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6914376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69143762019-12-16 Next Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening in the United Kingdom National Health Service van Campen, Julia C. Sollars, Elizabeth S. A. Thomas, Rebecca C. Bartlett, Clare M. Milano, Antonio Parker, Matthew D. Dawe, Jennifer Winship, Peter R. Peck, Gerrard Grafham, Darren Kirk, Richard J. Bonham, James R. Goodeve, Anne C. Dalton, Ann Int J Neonatal Screen Article Next generation DNA sequencing (NGS) has the potential to improve the diagnostic and prognostic utility of newborn screening programmes. This study assesses the feasibility of automating NGS on dried blood spot (DBS) DNA in a United Kingdom National Health Service (UK NHS) laboratory. An NGS panel targeting the entire coding sequence of five genes relevant to disorders currently screened for in newborns in the UK was validated on DBS DNA. An automated process for DNA extraction, NGS and bioinformatics analysis was developed. The process was tested on DBS to determine feasibility, turnaround time and cost. The analytical sensitivity of the assay was 100% and analytical specificity was 99.96%, with a mean 99.5% concordance of variant calls between DBS and venous blood samples in regions with ≥30× coverage (96.8% across all regions; all variant calls were single nucleotide variants (SNVs), with indel performance not assessed). The pipeline enabled processing of up to 1000 samples a week with a turnaround time of four days from receipt of sample to reporting. This study concluded that it is feasible to automate targeted NGS on routine DBS samples in a UK NHS laboratory setting, but it may not currently be cost effective as a first line test. MDPI 2019-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6914376/ /pubmed/31844782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns5040040 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
van Campen, Julia C.
Sollars, Elizabeth S. A.
Thomas, Rebecca C.
Bartlett, Clare M.
Milano, Antonio
Parker, Matthew D.
Dawe, Jennifer
Winship, Peter R.
Peck, Gerrard
Grafham, Darren
Kirk, Richard J.
Bonham, James R.
Goodeve, Anne C.
Dalton, Ann
Next Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening in the United Kingdom National Health Service
title Next Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening in the United Kingdom National Health Service
title_full Next Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening in the United Kingdom National Health Service
title_fullStr Next Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening in the United Kingdom National Health Service
title_full_unstemmed Next Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening in the United Kingdom National Health Service
title_short Next Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening in the United Kingdom National Health Service
title_sort next generation sequencing in newborn screening in the united kingdom national health service
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6914376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844782
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns5040040
work_keys_str_mv AT vancampenjuliac nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT sollarselizabethsa nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT thomasrebeccac nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT bartlettclarem nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT milanoantonio nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT parkermatthewd nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT dawejennifer nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT winshippeterr nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT peckgerrard nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT grafhamdarren nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT kirkrichardj nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT bonhamjamesr nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT goodeveannec nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice
AT daltonann nextgenerationsequencinginnewbornscreeningintheunitedkingdomnationalhealthservice