Cargando…

The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE: In vivo study of glucose homeostasis in pregnancy suggests normal glucose levels are lower than current glycemic targets used in gestational diabetes. After the HAPO study results, our institution began using glycemic targets of fasting 85 mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial of 110 mg/dL. We re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagen, Grace, Brown, Crystal, Dietrich, Jordan, Gibbs, Charles, Lee, Gene T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31886283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6372474
_version_ 1783479958089236480
author Hagen, Grace
Brown, Crystal
Dietrich, Jordan
Gibbs, Charles
Lee, Gene T.
author_facet Hagen, Grace
Brown, Crystal
Dietrich, Jordan
Gibbs, Charles
Lee, Gene T.
author_sort Hagen, Grace
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In vivo study of glucose homeostasis in pregnancy suggests normal glucose levels are lower than current glycemic targets used in gestational diabetes. After the HAPO study results, our institution began using glycemic targets of fasting 85 mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial of 110 mg/dL. We reviewed our results. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of GDM patients that delivered at KUMC from January 2007 to May 2017 was reviewed. All patients were diagnosed with the 2-step Carpenter-Coustan thresholds. High targets were compared with low targets. The primary outcome investigated was birthweight > 90% (large for gestational age, LGA). RESULTS: 604 patients were studied, and 34% were treated with low glycemic targets. Our unadjusted results showed that the low-target group had a lower incidence of LGA infants (24.0 vs. 31.8%), higher incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia (20.7 vs. 11.6%), and inductions (39.4 vs. 20.5%). After adjustment for demographic variables, only a higher risk of inductions remained (aOR 2.54 (1.44, 4.49)). CONCLUSION: Lower glycemic targets did not produce large reductions in fetal overgrowth, but they were associated with a higher rate of inductions. As there were no observed differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes otherwise, aiming for lower glycemic targets in GDM is likely not cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6915122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69151222019-12-29 The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study Hagen, Grace Brown, Crystal Dietrich, Jordan Gibbs, Charles Lee, Gene T. J Diabetes Res Research Article OBJECTIVE: In vivo study of glucose homeostasis in pregnancy suggests normal glucose levels are lower than current glycemic targets used in gestational diabetes. After the HAPO study results, our institution began using glycemic targets of fasting 85 mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial of 110 mg/dL. We reviewed our results. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of GDM patients that delivered at KUMC from January 2007 to May 2017 was reviewed. All patients were diagnosed with the 2-step Carpenter-Coustan thresholds. High targets were compared with low targets. The primary outcome investigated was birthweight > 90% (large for gestational age, LGA). RESULTS: 604 patients were studied, and 34% were treated with low glycemic targets. Our unadjusted results showed that the low-target group had a lower incidence of LGA infants (24.0 vs. 31.8%), higher incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia (20.7 vs. 11.6%), and inductions (39.4 vs. 20.5%). After adjustment for demographic variables, only a higher risk of inductions remained (aOR 2.54 (1.44, 4.49)). CONCLUSION: Lower glycemic targets did not produce large reductions in fetal overgrowth, but they were associated with a higher rate of inductions. As there were no observed differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes otherwise, aiming for lower glycemic targets in GDM is likely not cost-effective. Hindawi 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6915122/ /pubmed/31886283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6372474 Text en Copyright © 2019 Grace Hagen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hagen, Grace
Brown, Crystal
Dietrich, Jordan
Gibbs, Charles
Lee, Gene T.
The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study
title The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study
title_full The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study
title_short The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study
title_sort utility of lower glycemic targets for treating gestational diabetes: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31886283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6372474
work_keys_str_mv AT hagengrace theutilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy
AT browncrystal theutilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy
AT dietrichjordan theutilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy
AT gibbscharles theutilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy
AT leegenet theutilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy
AT hagengrace utilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy
AT browncrystal utilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy
AT dietrichjordan utilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy
AT gibbscharles utilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy
AT leegenet utilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy