Cargando…
The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study
OBJECTIVE: In vivo study of glucose homeostasis in pregnancy suggests normal glucose levels are lower than current glycemic targets used in gestational diabetes. After the HAPO study results, our institution began using glycemic targets of fasting 85 mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial of 110 mg/dL. We re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31886283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6372474 |
_version_ | 1783479958089236480 |
---|---|
author | Hagen, Grace Brown, Crystal Dietrich, Jordan Gibbs, Charles Lee, Gene T. |
author_facet | Hagen, Grace Brown, Crystal Dietrich, Jordan Gibbs, Charles Lee, Gene T. |
author_sort | Hagen, Grace |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In vivo study of glucose homeostasis in pregnancy suggests normal glucose levels are lower than current glycemic targets used in gestational diabetes. After the HAPO study results, our institution began using glycemic targets of fasting 85 mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial of 110 mg/dL. We reviewed our results. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of GDM patients that delivered at KUMC from January 2007 to May 2017 was reviewed. All patients were diagnosed with the 2-step Carpenter-Coustan thresholds. High targets were compared with low targets. The primary outcome investigated was birthweight > 90% (large for gestational age, LGA). RESULTS: 604 patients were studied, and 34% were treated with low glycemic targets. Our unadjusted results showed that the low-target group had a lower incidence of LGA infants (24.0 vs. 31.8%), higher incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia (20.7 vs. 11.6%), and inductions (39.4 vs. 20.5%). After adjustment for demographic variables, only a higher risk of inductions remained (aOR 2.54 (1.44, 4.49)). CONCLUSION: Lower glycemic targets did not produce large reductions in fetal overgrowth, but they were associated with a higher rate of inductions. As there were no observed differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes otherwise, aiming for lower glycemic targets in GDM is likely not cost-effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6915122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69151222019-12-29 The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study Hagen, Grace Brown, Crystal Dietrich, Jordan Gibbs, Charles Lee, Gene T. J Diabetes Res Research Article OBJECTIVE: In vivo study of glucose homeostasis in pregnancy suggests normal glucose levels are lower than current glycemic targets used in gestational diabetes. After the HAPO study results, our institution began using glycemic targets of fasting 85 mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial of 110 mg/dL. We reviewed our results. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of GDM patients that delivered at KUMC from January 2007 to May 2017 was reviewed. All patients were diagnosed with the 2-step Carpenter-Coustan thresholds. High targets were compared with low targets. The primary outcome investigated was birthweight > 90% (large for gestational age, LGA). RESULTS: 604 patients were studied, and 34% were treated with low glycemic targets. Our unadjusted results showed that the low-target group had a lower incidence of LGA infants (24.0 vs. 31.8%), higher incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia (20.7 vs. 11.6%), and inductions (39.4 vs. 20.5%). After adjustment for demographic variables, only a higher risk of inductions remained (aOR 2.54 (1.44, 4.49)). CONCLUSION: Lower glycemic targets did not produce large reductions in fetal overgrowth, but they were associated with a higher rate of inductions. As there were no observed differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes otherwise, aiming for lower glycemic targets in GDM is likely not cost-effective. Hindawi 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6915122/ /pubmed/31886283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6372474 Text en Copyright © 2019 Grace Hagen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hagen, Grace Brown, Crystal Dietrich, Jordan Gibbs, Charles Lee, Gene T. The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study |
title | The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | The Utility of Lower Glycemic Targets for Treating Gestational Diabetes: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | utility of lower glycemic targets for treating gestational diabetes: a retrospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31886283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6372474 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hagengrace theutilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy AT browncrystal theutilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy AT dietrichjordan theutilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy AT gibbscharles theutilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy AT leegenet theutilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy AT hagengrace utilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy AT browncrystal utilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy AT dietrichjordan utilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy AT gibbscharles utilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy AT leegenet utilityoflowerglycemictargetsfortreatinggestationaldiabetesaretrospectivestudy |