Cargando…

Tensile Properties of Three Selected Collagen Membranes

BACKGROUND: Biological barriers are commonly used to treat alveolar bone defects and guide tissue regeneration. Understanding the biological and mechanical properties of the available membranes is crucial for selecting the one that is optimal for enhancing clinical outcomes. PURPOSE: To evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raz, Perry, Brosh, Tamar, Ronen, Guy, Tal, Haim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31886222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5163603
_version_ 1783479961921781760
author Raz, Perry
Brosh, Tamar
Ronen, Guy
Tal, Haim
author_facet Raz, Perry
Brosh, Tamar
Ronen, Guy
Tal, Haim
author_sort Raz, Perry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biological barriers are commonly used to treat alveolar bone defects and guide tissue regeneration. Understanding the biological and mechanical properties of the available membranes is crucial for selecting the one that is optimal for enhancing clinical outcomes. PURPOSE: To evaluate the mechanical behavior of three different collagen membranes to increasing tensile force in dry and wet conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three commercially collagen membranes were selected for analysis: Bio-Gide® (Geistlich Biomaterials, Baden-Baden, Germany), Remaix™ (RX; Matricel GmbH, Herzogenrath, Germany), and Ossix Plus® (Datum Dental Biotech, Lod, Israel). Increasing tensile forces were applied on 10 dry and wet membranes of standard size via a loading machine. Force and extension values were acquired up to maximum load before failure, and maximum stress, maximum extension, and amount of energy needed for membrane tearing were analyzed. Membranes' densities were also calculated. RESULTS: The Remaix membrane exhibited the highest values of maximum load tensile strength, maximum extension, and maximum energy required for membrane tearing, followed by Bio-Gide. Ossix Plus had the lowest scores in all these parameters. Dry membranes had the highest scores for all parameters except extension. Membrane density was directly and significantly correlated with all tested parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The study was undertaken to provide clinicians with data upon which to base the selection of collagen membranes in order to achieve optimal clinical results. It emerged that the mechanical properties of dry and wet collagen membranes were significantly different from one another. Among the 3 tested membranes, Remaix exhibited higher performance results in all the mechanical tests. Collagen membrane density seems to have a significant influence upon mechanical resistance. These findings may also guide manufacturers in improving the quality of their product.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6915138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69151382019-12-29 Tensile Properties of Three Selected Collagen Membranes Raz, Perry Brosh, Tamar Ronen, Guy Tal, Haim Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: Biological barriers are commonly used to treat alveolar bone defects and guide tissue regeneration. Understanding the biological and mechanical properties of the available membranes is crucial for selecting the one that is optimal for enhancing clinical outcomes. PURPOSE: To evaluate the mechanical behavior of three different collagen membranes to increasing tensile force in dry and wet conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three commercially collagen membranes were selected for analysis: Bio-Gide® (Geistlich Biomaterials, Baden-Baden, Germany), Remaix™ (RX; Matricel GmbH, Herzogenrath, Germany), and Ossix Plus® (Datum Dental Biotech, Lod, Israel). Increasing tensile forces were applied on 10 dry and wet membranes of standard size via a loading machine. Force and extension values were acquired up to maximum load before failure, and maximum stress, maximum extension, and amount of energy needed for membrane tearing were analyzed. Membranes' densities were also calculated. RESULTS: The Remaix membrane exhibited the highest values of maximum load tensile strength, maximum extension, and maximum energy required for membrane tearing, followed by Bio-Gide. Ossix Plus had the lowest scores in all these parameters. Dry membranes had the highest scores for all parameters except extension. Membrane density was directly and significantly correlated with all tested parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The study was undertaken to provide clinicians with data upon which to base the selection of collagen membranes in order to achieve optimal clinical results. It emerged that the mechanical properties of dry and wet collagen membranes were significantly different from one another. Among the 3 tested membranes, Remaix exhibited higher performance results in all the mechanical tests. Collagen membrane density seems to have a significant influence upon mechanical resistance. These findings may also guide manufacturers in improving the quality of their product. Hindawi 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6915138/ /pubmed/31886222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5163603 Text en Copyright © 2019 Perry Raz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Raz, Perry
Brosh, Tamar
Ronen, Guy
Tal, Haim
Tensile Properties of Three Selected Collagen Membranes
title Tensile Properties of Three Selected Collagen Membranes
title_full Tensile Properties of Three Selected Collagen Membranes
title_fullStr Tensile Properties of Three Selected Collagen Membranes
title_full_unstemmed Tensile Properties of Three Selected Collagen Membranes
title_short Tensile Properties of Three Selected Collagen Membranes
title_sort tensile properties of three selected collagen membranes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31886222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5163603
work_keys_str_mv AT razperry tensilepropertiesofthreeselectedcollagenmembranes
AT broshtamar tensilepropertiesofthreeselectedcollagenmembranes
AT ronenguy tensilepropertiesofthreeselectedcollagenmembranes
AT talhaim tensilepropertiesofthreeselectedcollagenmembranes