Cargando…

Development and Evaluation of Novel Electronic Medical Record Tools For Avoiding Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND: Bleeding remains the most common complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. Guidelines recommend assessing bleeding risk before percutaneous coronary intervention to target use of bleeding avoidance strategies and mitigate bleeding events. Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center undertook a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ebinger, Joseph, Henry, Timothy, Kim, Sungjin, Inkelas, Moira, Cheng, Susan, Nuckols, Teryl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31707946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013954
_version_ 1783479979871305728
author Ebinger, Joseph
Henry, Timothy
Kim, Sungjin
Inkelas, Moira
Cheng, Susan
Nuckols, Teryl
author_facet Ebinger, Joseph
Henry, Timothy
Kim, Sungjin
Inkelas, Moira
Cheng, Susan
Nuckols, Teryl
author_sort Ebinger, Joseph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bleeding remains the most common complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. Guidelines recommend assessing bleeding risk before percutaneous coronary intervention to target use of bleeding avoidance strategies and mitigate bleeding events. Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center undertook an initiative to integrate these recommendations into the electronic medical record. METHODS AND RESULTS: The intervention included a voluntary clinical decision alert to assess bleeding risk before percutaneous coronary intervention, a bleeding risk calculator tool based on the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) risk prediction model and, when indicated, a second alert to consider 4 bleeding avoidance strategies. We tested for changes in the use of bleeding avoidance strategies and bleeding event rates by comparing procedures performed before versus after implementation of the electronic medical record–based intervention and with versus without use of the bleeding risk calculator tool. Use of radial access increased (47.6% versus 64.8%; P<0.001) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors decreased (12.8% versus 3.17%; P<0.001) from before to after implementation, though risk‐adjusted bleeding event rates were stable (odds ratio, 0.82; P=0.164), even for high‐risk procedures. Use versus nonuse of the bleeding risk calculator tool was associated with increased radial access and reductions in glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, but no change in bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating guideline recommendations into the electronic medical record to promote assessments of bleeding risk and use of bleeding avoidance strategies was feasible and associated with changes in clinical practice. Future work is needed to ensure that bleeding avoidance strategies are not overused among lower‐risk patients, and that, for high‐risk patients, the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention are carefully weighed against the risk of bleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6915282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69152822019-12-23 Development and Evaluation of Novel Electronic Medical Record Tools For Avoiding Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Ebinger, Joseph Henry, Timothy Kim, Sungjin Inkelas, Moira Cheng, Susan Nuckols, Teryl J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Bleeding remains the most common complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. Guidelines recommend assessing bleeding risk before percutaneous coronary intervention to target use of bleeding avoidance strategies and mitigate bleeding events. Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center undertook an initiative to integrate these recommendations into the electronic medical record. METHODS AND RESULTS: The intervention included a voluntary clinical decision alert to assess bleeding risk before percutaneous coronary intervention, a bleeding risk calculator tool based on the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) risk prediction model and, when indicated, a second alert to consider 4 bleeding avoidance strategies. We tested for changes in the use of bleeding avoidance strategies and bleeding event rates by comparing procedures performed before versus after implementation of the electronic medical record–based intervention and with versus without use of the bleeding risk calculator tool. Use of radial access increased (47.6% versus 64.8%; P<0.001) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors decreased (12.8% versus 3.17%; P<0.001) from before to after implementation, though risk‐adjusted bleeding event rates were stable (odds ratio, 0.82; P=0.164), even for high‐risk procedures. Use versus nonuse of the bleeding risk calculator tool was associated with increased radial access and reductions in glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, but no change in bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating guideline recommendations into the electronic medical record to promote assessments of bleeding risk and use of bleeding avoidance strategies was feasible and associated with changes in clinical practice. Future work is needed to ensure that bleeding avoidance strategies are not overused among lower‐risk patients, and that, for high‐risk patients, the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention are carefully weighed against the risk of bleeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6915282/ /pubmed/31707946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013954 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ebinger, Joseph
Henry, Timothy
Kim, Sungjin
Inkelas, Moira
Cheng, Susan
Nuckols, Teryl
Development and Evaluation of Novel Electronic Medical Record Tools For Avoiding Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title Development and Evaluation of Novel Electronic Medical Record Tools For Avoiding Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full Development and Evaluation of Novel Electronic Medical Record Tools For Avoiding Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_fullStr Development and Evaluation of Novel Electronic Medical Record Tools For Avoiding Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Development and Evaluation of Novel Electronic Medical Record Tools For Avoiding Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_short Development and Evaluation of Novel Electronic Medical Record Tools For Avoiding Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_sort development and evaluation of novel electronic medical record tools for avoiding bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31707946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013954
work_keys_str_mv AT ebingerjoseph developmentandevaluationofnovelelectronicmedicalrecordtoolsforavoidingbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT henrytimothy developmentandevaluationofnovelelectronicmedicalrecordtoolsforavoidingbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT kimsungjin developmentandevaluationofnovelelectronicmedicalrecordtoolsforavoidingbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT inkelasmoira developmentandevaluationofnovelelectronicmedicalrecordtoolsforavoidingbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT chengsusan developmentandevaluationofnovelelectronicmedicalrecordtoolsforavoidingbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT nuckolsteryl developmentandevaluationofnovelelectronicmedicalrecordtoolsforavoidingbleedingafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention