Cargando…

Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal

Edible insects represent an interesting alternative source of protein for human consumption but the main hurdle facing the edible insect sector is low consumer acceptance. However, increased acceptance is anticipated when insects are incorporated as a processed ingredient, such as protein-rich powde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laroche, Myriam, Perreault, Véronique, Marciniak, Alice, Gravel, Alexia, Chamberland, Julien, Doyen, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods8110572
_version_ 1783479993629671424
author Laroche, Myriam
Perreault, Véronique
Marciniak, Alice
Gravel, Alexia
Chamberland, Julien
Doyen, Alain
author_facet Laroche, Myriam
Perreault, Véronique
Marciniak, Alice
Gravel, Alexia
Chamberland, Julien
Doyen, Alain
author_sort Laroche, Myriam
collection PubMed
description Edible insects represent an interesting alternative source of protein for human consumption but the main hurdle facing the edible insect sector is low consumer acceptance. However, increased acceptance is anticipated when insects are incorporated as a processed ingredient, such as protein-rich powder, rather than presented whole. To produce edible insect fractions with high protein content, a defatting step is necessary. This study investigated the effects of six defatting methods (conventional solvents, three-phase partitioning, and supercritical CO(2)) on lipid extraction yield, fatty profiles, and protein extraction and purification of house cricket (Acheta domesticus) and mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) meals. Ethanol increased the lipid extraction yield (22.7%–28.8%), irrespective of the insect meal used or the extraction method applied. Supercritical CO(2) gave similar lipid extraction yields as conventional methods for Tenebrio molitor (T. molitor) (22.1%) but was less efficient for Acheta domesticus (A. domesticus) (11.9%). The protein extraction yield ranged from 12.4% to 38.9% for A. domesticus, and from 11.9% to 39.3% for T. molitor, whereas purification rates ranged from 58.3% to 78.5% for A. domesticus and from 48.7% to 75.4% for T. molitor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6915342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69153422019-12-24 Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal Laroche, Myriam Perreault, Véronique Marciniak, Alice Gravel, Alexia Chamberland, Julien Doyen, Alain Foods Article Edible insects represent an interesting alternative source of protein for human consumption but the main hurdle facing the edible insect sector is low consumer acceptance. However, increased acceptance is anticipated when insects are incorporated as a processed ingredient, such as protein-rich powder, rather than presented whole. To produce edible insect fractions with high protein content, a defatting step is necessary. This study investigated the effects of six defatting methods (conventional solvents, three-phase partitioning, and supercritical CO(2)) on lipid extraction yield, fatty profiles, and protein extraction and purification of house cricket (Acheta domesticus) and mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) meals. Ethanol increased the lipid extraction yield (22.7%–28.8%), irrespective of the insect meal used or the extraction method applied. Supercritical CO(2) gave similar lipid extraction yields as conventional methods for Tenebrio molitor (T. molitor) (22.1%) but was less efficient for Acheta domesticus (A. domesticus) (11.9%). The protein extraction yield ranged from 12.4% to 38.9% for A. domesticus, and from 11.9% to 39.3% for T. molitor, whereas purification rates ranged from 58.3% to 78.5% for A. domesticus and from 48.7% to 75.4% for T. molitor. MDPI 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6915342/ /pubmed/31766306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods8110572 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Laroche, Myriam
Perreault, Véronique
Marciniak, Alice
Gravel, Alexia
Chamberland, Julien
Doyen, Alain
Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal
title Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal
title_full Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal
title_fullStr Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal
title_short Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal
title_sort comparison of conventional and sustainable lipid extraction methods for the production of oil and protein isolate from edible insect meal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods8110572
work_keys_str_mv AT larochemyriam comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal
AT perreaultveronique comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal
AT marciniakalice comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal
AT gravelalexia comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal
AT chamberlandjulien comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal
AT doyenalain comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal