Cargando…
Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal
Edible insects represent an interesting alternative source of protein for human consumption but the main hurdle facing the edible insect sector is low consumer acceptance. However, increased acceptance is anticipated when insects are incorporated as a processed ingredient, such as protein-rich powde...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods8110572 |
_version_ | 1783479993629671424 |
---|---|
author | Laroche, Myriam Perreault, Véronique Marciniak, Alice Gravel, Alexia Chamberland, Julien Doyen, Alain |
author_facet | Laroche, Myriam Perreault, Véronique Marciniak, Alice Gravel, Alexia Chamberland, Julien Doyen, Alain |
author_sort | Laroche, Myriam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Edible insects represent an interesting alternative source of protein for human consumption but the main hurdle facing the edible insect sector is low consumer acceptance. However, increased acceptance is anticipated when insects are incorporated as a processed ingredient, such as protein-rich powder, rather than presented whole. To produce edible insect fractions with high protein content, a defatting step is necessary. This study investigated the effects of six defatting methods (conventional solvents, three-phase partitioning, and supercritical CO(2)) on lipid extraction yield, fatty profiles, and protein extraction and purification of house cricket (Acheta domesticus) and mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) meals. Ethanol increased the lipid extraction yield (22.7%–28.8%), irrespective of the insect meal used or the extraction method applied. Supercritical CO(2) gave similar lipid extraction yields as conventional methods for Tenebrio molitor (T. molitor) (22.1%) but was less efficient for Acheta domesticus (A. domesticus) (11.9%). The protein extraction yield ranged from 12.4% to 38.9% for A. domesticus, and from 11.9% to 39.3% for T. molitor, whereas purification rates ranged from 58.3% to 78.5% for A. domesticus and from 48.7% to 75.4% for T. molitor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6915342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69153422019-12-24 Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal Laroche, Myriam Perreault, Véronique Marciniak, Alice Gravel, Alexia Chamberland, Julien Doyen, Alain Foods Article Edible insects represent an interesting alternative source of protein for human consumption but the main hurdle facing the edible insect sector is low consumer acceptance. However, increased acceptance is anticipated when insects are incorporated as a processed ingredient, such as protein-rich powder, rather than presented whole. To produce edible insect fractions with high protein content, a defatting step is necessary. This study investigated the effects of six defatting methods (conventional solvents, three-phase partitioning, and supercritical CO(2)) on lipid extraction yield, fatty profiles, and protein extraction and purification of house cricket (Acheta domesticus) and mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) meals. Ethanol increased the lipid extraction yield (22.7%–28.8%), irrespective of the insect meal used or the extraction method applied. Supercritical CO(2) gave similar lipid extraction yields as conventional methods for Tenebrio molitor (T. molitor) (22.1%) but was less efficient for Acheta domesticus (A. domesticus) (11.9%). The protein extraction yield ranged from 12.4% to 38.9% for A. domesticus, and from 11.9% to 39.3% for T. molitor, whereas purification rates ranged from 58.3% to 78.5% for A. domesticus and from 48.7% to 75.4% for T. molitor. MDPI 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6915342/ /pubmed/31766306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods8110572 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Laroche, Myriam Perreault, Véronique Marciniak, Alice Gravel, Alexia Chamberland, Julien Doyen, Alain Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal |
title | Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal |
title_full | Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal |
title_short | Comparison of Conventional and Sustainable Lipid Extraction Methods for the Production of Oil and Protein Isolate from Edible Insect Meal |
title_sort | comparison of conventional and sustainable lipid extraction methods for the production of oil and protein isolate from edible insect meal |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods8110572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larochemyriam comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal AT perreaultveronique comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal AT marciniakalice comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal AT gravelalexia comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal AT chamberlandjulien comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal AT doyenalain comparisonofconventionalandsustainablelipidextractionmethodsfortheproductionofoilandproteinisolatefromedibleinsectmeal |