Cargando…

Efficacy of guided self-change for smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of guided self-change (GSC), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and their combination, on smoking cessation among patients with COPD. METHODS: A total of 60 participants were randomly assigned to three groups for GSC (n=20), nicotine r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zarghami, Mehran, Taghizadeh, Fatemeh, Sharifpour, Ali, Alipour, Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892920
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/114227
_version_ 1783480015280668672
author Zarghami, Mehran
Taghizadeh, Fatemeh
Sharifpour, Ali
Alipour, Abbas
author_facet Zarghami, Mehran
Taghizadeh, Fatemeh
Sharifpour, Ali
Alipour, Abbas
author_sort Zarghami, Mehran
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of guided self-change (GSC), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and their combination, on smoking cessation among patients with COPD. METHODS: A total of 60 participants were randomly assigned to three groups for GSC (n=20), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (n=20) or their combination (n=20), from December 2016 to November 2017. The quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, clinical assessment test (CAT) and exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), were measured at baseline and post-treatment. RESULTS: At 6, 12, and 29 weeks, the abstinence rate in the NRT group was 5.3%, 15.8% and 21.1%, in the GSC group 21.1%, 31.6% and 47.4%, and in the combined group 36.8%, 36.8% and 47.4%, respectively. The exhaled CO in the NRT group was greater than the GSC group, however this difference was not statistically significant (3.4; 95% CI: -0.24–7.0; p=0.067), CO levels in the combined group were less than the GSC group, while this difference was also not significant (-0.75; 95% CI : -4.2–2.7; p=0.68). CAT and QoL recovery in the GSC and combined groups were higher than in the NRT group (9.2; 95% CI: 5.0–13.4; p=0.001) and (-4.5; 95% C: -8.1– -0.6; p=0.02), respectively. However, differences between combined and GSC groups were not significant (p=0.24 and p=0.41, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference between the abstinence rate in the GSC or combined group and the NRT group (p=0.001). The GEE model showed that GSC reduced the odds of smoking compared with the NRT group (interaction group effect) (OR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.022–0.545; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our context among COPD patients, GSC was more effective in decreasing smoking than NRT alone. Moreover, the recovery of exhaled carbon monoxide, CAT and QoL in GSC was more than in the NRT group. Moreover, since GSC was as effective as GSC plus NRT, the effectiveness of the combination method for smoking cessation in COPD patients may be attributed to GSC. Clinical trial registration details: IRCT201609271457N11; www.irct.ir
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6915435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69154352019-12-31 Efficacy of guided self-change for smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial Zarghami, Mehran Taghizadeh, Fatemeh Sharifpour, Ali Alipour, Abbas Tob Induc Dis Research Paper INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of guided self-change (GSC), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and their combination, on smoking cessation among patients with COPD. METHODS: A total of 60 participants were randomly assigned to three groups for GSC (n=20), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (n=20) or their combination (n=20), from December 2016 to November 2017. The quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, clinical assessment test (CAT) and exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), were measured at baseline and post-treatment. RESULTS: At 6, 12, and 29 weeks, the abstinence rate in the NRT group was 5.3%, 15.8% and 21.1%, in the GSC group 21.1%, 31.6% and 47.4%, and in the combined group 36.8%, 36.8% and 47.4%, respectively. The exhaled CO in the NRT group was greater than the GSC group, however this difference was not statistically significant (3.4; 95% CI: -0.24–7.0; p=0.067), CO levels in the combined group were less than the GSC group, while this difference was also not significant (-0.75; 95% CI : -4.2–2.7; p=0.68). CAT and QoL recovery in the GSC and combined groups were higher than in the NRT group (9.2; 95% CI: 5.0–13.4; p=0.001) and (-4.5; 95% C: -8.1– -0.6; p=0.02), respectively. However, differences between combined and GSC groups were not significant (p=0.24 and p=0.41, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference between the abstinence rate in the GSC or combined group and the NRT group (p=0.001). The GEE model showed that GSC reduced the odds of smoking compared with the NRT group (interaction group effect) (OR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.022–0.545; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our context among COPD patients, GSC was more effective in decreasing smoking than NRT alone. Moreover, the recovery of exhaled carbon monoxide, CAT and QoL in GSC was more than in the NRT group. Moreover, since GSC was as effective as GSC plus NRT, the effectiveness of the combination method for smoking cessation in COPD patients may be attributed to GSC. Clinical trial registration details: IRCT201609271457N11; www.irct.ir European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6915435/ /pubmed/31892920 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/114227 Text en © 2019 Zarghami M https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zarghami, Mehran
Taghizadeh, Fatemeh
Sharifpour, Ali
Alipour, Abbas
Efficacy of guided self-change for smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title Efficacy of guided self-change for smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Efficacy of guided self-change for smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of guided self-change for smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of guided self-change for smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Efficacy of guided self-change for smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort efficacy of guided self-change for smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892920
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/114227
work_keys_str_mv AT zarghamimehran efficacyofguidedselfchangeforsmokingcessationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT taghizadehfatemeh efficacyofguidedselfchangeforsmokingcessationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT sharifpourali efficacyofguidedselfchangeforsmokingcessationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT alipourabbas efficacyofguidedselfchangeforsmokingcessationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial