Cargando…

Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei

The Assess2Perform Bar Sensei is a device used to measure barbell velocity for velocity-based training that has not yet been validated. The purpose of this study was to determine criterion validity and reliability of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei in barbell back squats by comparing it against the Gy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beckham, George K., Layne, Danielle K., Kim, Steven B., Martin, Eric A., Perez, Benjamin G., Adams, Kent J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7110230
_version_ 1783480058019577856
author Beckham, George K.
Layne, Danielle K.
Kim, Steven B.
Martin, Eric A.
Perez, Benjamin G.
Adams, Kent J.
author_facet Beckham, George K.
Layne, Danielle K.
Kim, Steven B.
Martin, Eric A.
Perez, Benjamin G.
Adams, Kent J.
author_sort Beckham, George K.
collection PubMed
description The Assess2Perform Bar Sensei is a device used to measure barbell velocity for velocity-based training that has not yet been validated. The purpose of this study was to determine criterion validity and reliability of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei in barbell back squats by comparing it against the GymAware PowerTool, a previously validated instrument. Sixteen injury-free, resistance-trained subjects (eleven males and five females) were recruited. Subjects were tested for their back squat one repetition maximum (1RM). Then, on two separate days, subjects performed two sets of three repetitions at loads of 45%, 60% and 75% 1RM. The GymAware PowerTool and Bar Sensei were attached to the barbell in similar locations for concurrent collection of mean concentric velocity (MCV) and peak concentric velocity (PCV). The Bar Sensei and PowerTool showed generally fair to poor agreement for MCV and PCV when subjects lifted 45% of 1RM (intraclass correlation;ICC 0.4–0.59), and they showed poor agreement when subjects lifted 60% and 75% of 1RM (ICC 0.3–0.4). Inter-repetition/within-set reliability for the Bar Sensei ranged between ICC = 0.273–0.451 for MCV and PCV compared to the far more reliable PowerTool (ICC = 0.651–0.793). Currently, the Bar Sensei is not a reliable or valid tool for measuring barbell velocity in back squats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6915617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69156172019-12-24 Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei Beckham, George K. Layne, Danielle K. Kim, Steven B. Martin, Eric A. Perez, Benjamin G. Adams, Kent J. Sports (Basel) Article The Assess2Perform Bar Sensei is a device used to measure barbell velocity for velocity-based training that has not yet been validated. The purpose of this study was to determine criterion validity and reliability of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei in barbell back squats by comparing it against the GymAware PowerTool, a previously validated instrument. Sixteen injury-free, resistance-trained subjects (eleven males and five females) were recruited. Subjects were tested for their back squat one repetition maximum (1RM). Then, on two separate days, subjects performed two sets of three repetitions at loads of 45%, 60% and 75% 1RM. The GymAware PowerTool and Bar Sensei were attached to the barbell in similar locations for concurrent collection of mean concentric velocity (MCV) and peak concentric velocity (PCV). The Bar Sensei and PowerTool showed generally fair to poor agreement for MCV and PCV when subjects lifted 45% of 1RM (intraclass correlation;ICC 0.4–0.59), and they showed poor agreement when subjects lifted 60% and 75% of 1RM (ICC 0.3–0.4). Inter-repetition/within-set reliability for the Bar Sensei ranged between ICC = 0.273–0.451 for MCV and PCV compared to the far more reliable PowerTool (ICC = 0.651–0.793). Currently, the Bar Sensei is not a reliable or valid tool for measuring barbell velocity in back squats. MDPI 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6915617/ /pubmed/31703335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7110230 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Beckham, George K.
Layne, Danielle K.
Kim, Steven B.
Martin, Eric A.
Perez, Benjamin G.
Adams, Kent J.
Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei
title Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei
title_full Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei
title_fullStr Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei
title_short Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei
title_sort reliability and criterion validity of the assess2perform bar sensei
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7110230
work_keys_str_mv AT beckhamgeorgek reliabilityandcriterionvalidityoftheassess2performbarsensei
AT laynedaniellek reliabilityandcriterionvalidityoftheassess2performbarsensei
AT kimstevenb reliabilityandcriterionvalidityoftheassess2performbarsensei
AT martinerica reliabilityandcriterionvalidityoftheassess2performbarsensei
AT perezbenjaming reliabilityandcriterionvalidityoftheassess2performbarsensei
AT adamskentj reliabilityandcriterionvalidityoftheassess2performbarsensei