Cargando…

Level-biases in estimated breeding values due to the use of different SNP panels over time in ssGBLUP

BACKGROUND: The main aim of single-step genomic predictions was to facilitate optimal selection in populations consisting of both genotyped and non-genotyped individuals. However, in spite of intensive research, biases still occur, which make it difficult to perform optimal selection across groups o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordbø, Øyvind, Gjuvsland, Arne B., Eikje, Leiv Sigbjørn, Meuwissen, Theo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0517-z
_version_ 1783480114283020288
author Nordbø, Øyvind
Gjuvsland, Arne B.
Eikje, Leiv Sigbjørn
Meuwissen, Theo
author_facet Nordbø, Øyvind
Gjuvsland, Arne B.
Eikje, Leiv Sigbjørn
Meuwissen, Theo
author_sort Nordbø, Øyvind
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The main aim of single-step genomic predictions was to facilitate optimal selection in populations consisting of both genotyped and non-genotyped individuals. However, in spite of intensive research, biases still occur, which make it difficult to perform optimal selection across groups of animals. The objective of this study was to investigate whether incomplete genotype datasets with errors could be a potential source of level-bias between genotyped and non-genotyped animals and between animals genotyped on different single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels in single-step genomic predictions. RESULTS: Incomplete and erroneous genotypes of young animals caused biases in breeding values between groups of animals. Systematic noise or missing data for less than 1% of the SNPs in the genotype data had substantial effects on the differences in breeding values between genotyped and non-genotyped animals, and between animals genotyped on different chips. The breeding values of young genotyped individuals were biased upward, and the magnitude was up to 0.8 genetic standard deviations, compared with breeding values of non-genotyped individuals. Similarly, the magnitude of a small value added to the diagonal of the genomic relationship matrix affected the level of average breeding values between groups of genotyped and non-genotyped animals. Cross-validation accuracies and regression coefficients were not sensitive to these factors. CONCLUSIONS: Because, historically, different SNP chips have been used for genotyping different parts of a population, fine-tuning of imputation within and across SNP chips and handling of missing genotypes are crucial for reducing bias. Although all the SNPs used for estimating breeding values are present on the chip used for genotyping young animals, incompleteness and some genotype errors might lead to level-biases in breeding values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6915884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69158842019-12-30 Level-biases in estimated breeding values due to the use of different SNP panels over time in ssGBLUP Nordbø, Øyvind Gjuvsland, Arne B. Eikje, Leiv Sigbjørn Meuwissen, Theo Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: The main aim of single-step genomic predictions was to facilitate optimal selection in populations consisting of both genotyped and non-genotyped individuals. However, in spite of intensive research, biases still occur, which make it difficult to perform optimal selection across groups of animals. The objective of this study was to investigate whether incomplete genotype datasets with errors could be a potential source of level-bias between genotyped and non-genotyped animals and between animals genotyped on different single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels in single-step genomic predictions. RESULTS: Incomplete and erroneous genotypes of young animals caused biases in breeding values between groups of animals. Systematic noise or missing data for less than 1% of the SNPs in the genotype data had substantial effects on the differences in breeding values between genotyped and non-genotyped animals, and between animals genotyped on different chips. The breeding values of young genotyped individuals were biased upward, and the magnitude was up to 0.8 genetic standard deviations, compared with breeding values of non-genotyped individuals. Similarly, the magnitude of a small value added to the diagonal of the genomic relationship matrix affected the level of average breeding values between groups of genotyped and non-genotyped animals. Cross-validation accuracies and regression coefficients were not sensitive to these factors. CONCLUSIONS: Because, historically, different SNP chips have been used for genotyping different parts of a population, fine-tuning of imputation within and across SNP chips and handling of missing genotypes are crucial for reducing bias. Although all the SNPs used for estimating breeding values are present on the chip used for genotyping young animals, incompleteness and some genotype errors might lead to level-biases in breeding values. BioMed Central 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6915884/ /pubmed/31842728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0517-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nordbø, Øyvind
Gjuvsland, Arne B.
Eikje, Leiv Sigbjørn
Meuwissen, Theo
Level-biases in estimated breeding values due to the use of different SNP panels over time in ssGBLUP
title Level-biases in estimated breeding values due to the use of different SNP panels over time in ssGBLUP
title_full Level-biases in estimated breeding values due to the use of different SNP panels over time in ssGBLUP
title_fullStr Level-biases in estimated breeding values due to the use of different SNP panels over time in ssGBLUP
title_full_unstemmed Level-biases in estimated breeding values due to the use of different SNP panels over time in ssGBLUP
title_short Level-biases in estimated breeding values due to the use of different SNP panels over time in ssGBLUP
title_sort level-biases in estimated breeding values due to the use of different snp panels over time in ssgblup
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0517-z
work_keys_str_mv AT nordbøøyvind levelbiasesinestimatedbreedingvaluesduetotheuseofdifferentsnppanelsovertimeinssgblup
AT gjuvslandarneb levelbiasesinestimatedbreedingvaluesduetotheuseofdifferentsnppanelsovertimeinssgblup
AT eikjeleivsigbjørn levelbiasesinestimatedbreedingvaluesduetotheuseofdifferentsnppanelsovertimeinssgblup
AT meuwissentheo levelbiasesinestimatedbreedingvaluesduetotheuseofdifferentsnppanelsovertimeinssgblup