Cargando…

Engaging people with lived experience in the grant review process

People with lived experience are individuals who have first-hand experience of the medical condition(s) being considered. The value of including the viewpoints of people with lived experience in health policy, health care, and health care and systems research has been recognized at many levels, incl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rittenbach, Katherine, Horne, Candice G., O’Riordan, Terence, Bichel, Allison, Mitchell, Nicholas, Fernandez Parra, Adriana M., MacMaster, Frank P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0436-0
_version_ 1783480116154728448
author Rittenbach, Katherine
Horne, Candice G.
O’Riordan, Terence
Bichel, Allison
Mitchell, Nicholas
Fernandez Parra, Adriana M.
MacMaster, Frank P.
author_facet Rittenbach, Katherine
Horne, Candice G.
O’Riordan, Terence
Bichel, Allison
Mitchell, Nicholas
Fernandez Parra, Adriana M.
MacMaster, Frank P.
author_sort Rittenbach, Katherine
collection PubMed
description People with lived experience are individuals who have first-hand experience of the medical condition(s) being considered. The value of including the viewpoints of people with lived experience in health policy, health care, and health care and systems research has been recognized at many levels, including by funding agencies. However, there is little guidance or established best practices on how to include non-academic reviewers in the grant review process. Here we describe our approach to the inclusion of people with lived experience in every stage of the grant review process. After a budget was created for a specific call, a steering committee was created. This group included researchers, people with lived experience, and health systems administrators. This group developed and issued the call. After receiving proposals, stage one was scientific review by researchers. Grants were ranked by this score and a short list then reviewed by people with lived experience as stage two. Finally, for stage three, the Steering Committee convened and achieved consensus based on information drawn from stages one and two. Our approach to engage people with lived experience in the grant review process was positively reviewed by everyone involved, as it allowed for patient perspectives to be truly integrated. However, it does lengthen the review process. The proposed model offers further practical insight into including people with lived experience in the review process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6915892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69158922019-12-30 Engaging people with lived experience in the grant review process Rittenbach, Katherine Horne, Candice G. O’Riordan, Terence Bichel, Allison Mitchell, Nicholas Fernandez Parra, Adriana M. MacMaster, Frank P. BMC Med Ethics Debate People with lived experience are individuals who have first-hand experience of the medical condition(s) being considered. The value of including the viewpoints of people with lived experience in health policy, health care, and health care and systems research has been recognized at many levels, including by funding agencies. However, there is little guidance or established best practices on how to include non-academic reviewers in the grant review process. Here we describe our approach to the inclusion of people with lived experience in every stage of the grant review process. After a budget was created for a specific call, a steering committee was created. This group included researchers, people with lived experience, and health systems administrators. This group developed and issued the call. After receiving proposals, stage one was scientific review by researchers. Grants were ranked by this score and a short list then reviewed by people with lived experience as stage two. Finally, for stage three, the Steering Committee convened and achieved consensus based on information drawn from stages one and two. Our approach to engage people with lived experience in the grant review process was positively reviewed by everyone involved, as it allowed for patient perspectives to be truly integrated. However, it does lengthen the review process. The proposed model offers further practical insight into including people with lived experience in the review process. BioMed Central 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6915892/ /pubmed/31842842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0436-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Rittenbach, Katherine
Horne, Candice G.
O’Riordan, Terence
Bichel, Allison
Mitchell, Nicholas
Fernandez Parra, Adriana M.
MacMaster, Frank P.
Engaging people with lived experience in the grant review process
title Engaging people with lived experience in the grant review process
title_full Engaging people with lived experience in the grant review process
title_fullStr Engaging people with lived experience in the grant review process
title_full_unstemmed Engaging people with lived experience in the grant review process
title_short Engaging people with lived experience in the grant review process
title_sort engaging people with lived experience in the grant review process
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0436-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rittenbachkatherine engagingpeoplewithlivedexperienceinthegrantreviewprocess
AT hornecandiceg engagingpeoplewithlivedexperienceinthegrantreviewprocess
AT oriordanterence engagingpeoplewithlivedexperienceinthegrantreviewprocess
AT bichelallison engagingpeoplewithlivedexperienceinthegrantreviewprocess
AT mitchellnicholas engagingpeoplewithlivedexperienceinthegrantreviewprocess
AT fernandezparraadrianam engagingpeoplewithlivedexperienceinthegrantreviewprocess
AT macmasterfrankp engagingpeoplewithlivedexperienceinthegrantreviewprocess