Cargando…

Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias are among the most frequent complications following abdominal surgery and cause substantial morbidity, impaired health-related quality of life and costs. Despite improvements in abdominal wall closure techniques, the risk for developing an incisional hernia is reported...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heger, Patrick, Feißt, Manuel, Krisam, Johannes, Klose, Christina, Dörr-Harim, Colette, Tenckhoff, Solveig, Büchler, Markus W., Diener, Markus K., Mihaljevic, André L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3921-3
_version_ 1783480132506222592
author Heger, Patrick
Feißt, Manuel
Krisam, Johannes
Klose, Christina
Dörr-Harim, Colette
Tenckhoff, Solveig
Büchler, Markus W.
Diener, Markus K.
Mihaljevic, André L.
author_facet Heger, Patrick
Feißt, Manuel
Krisam, Johannes
Klose, Christina
Dörr-Harim, Colette
Tenckhoff, Solveig
Büchler, Markus W.
Diener, Markus K.
Mihaljevic, André L.
author_sort Heger, Patrick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias are among the most frequent complications following abdominal surgery and cause substantial morbidity, impaired health-related quality of life and costs. Despite improvements in abdominal wall closure techniques, the risk for developing an incisional hernia is reported to be between 10 and 30% following midline laparotomies. There have been two recent innovations with promising results to reduce hernia risks, namely the small stitches technique and the placement of a prophylactic mesh. So far, these two techniques have not been evaluated in combination. METHODS: The HULC trial is a multicentre, randomized controlled, observer- and patient-blinded surgical effectiveness trial with two parallel study groups. A total of 812 patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery via a midline laparotomy will be randomized in 12 centres after informed consent. Patients will be randomly assigned to the control group receiving closure of the midline incision with a slowly absorbable monofilament suture in the small stitches technique or to the intervention group, who will receive a small stitches closure followed by augmentation with a light-weight polypropylene mesh in the onlay technique. The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of incisional hernias, as defined by the European Hernia Society, within 24 months after surgery. Further perioperative parameters, as well as patient-reported outcomes, will be analysed as secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: The HULC trial will address the yet unanswered question of whether a combination of small stitched fascial closure and onlay mesh augmentation after elective midline laparotomies reduces the risk of incisional hernias. The HULC trial marks the logical and innovative next step in the development of a safe abdominal closure technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00017517. Registered on 24th June 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6915967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69159672019-12-30 Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Heger, Patrick Feißt, Manuel Krisam, Johannes Klose, Christina Dörr-Harim, Colette Tenckhoff, Solveig Büchler, Markus W. Diener, Markus K. Mihaljevic, André L. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias are among the most frequent complications following abdominal surgery and cause substantial morbidity, impaired health-related quality of life and costs. Despite improvements in abdominal wall closure techniques, the risk for developing an incisional hernia is reported to be between 10 and 30% following midline laparotomies. There have been two recent innovations with promising results to reduce hernia risks, namely the small stitches technique and the placement of a prophylactic mesh. So far, these two techniques have not been evaluated in combination. METHODS: The HULC trial is a multicentre, randomized controlled, observer- and patient-blinded surgical effectiveness trial with two parallel study groups. A total of 812 patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery via a midline laparotomy will be randomized in 12 centres after informed consent. Patients will be randomly assigned to the control group receiving closure of the midline incision with a slowly absorbable monofilament suture in the small stitches technique or to the intervention group, who will receive a small stitches closure followed by augmentation with a light-weight polypropylene mesh in the onlay technique. The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of incisional hernias, as defined by the European Hernia Society, within 24 months after surgery. Further perioperative parameters, as well as patient-reported outcomes, will be analysed as secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: The HULC trial will address the yet unanswered question of whether a combination of small stitched fascial closure and onlay mesh augmentation after elective midline laparotomies reduces the risk of incisional hernias. The HULC trial marks the logical and innovative next step in the development of a safe abdominal closure technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00017517. Registered on 24th June 2019. BioMed Central 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6915967/ /pubmed/31842966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3921-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Heger, Patrick
Feißt, Manuel
Krisam, Johannes
Klose, Christina
Dörr-Harim, Colette
Tenckhoff, Solveig
Büchler, Markus W.
Diener, Markus K.
Mihaljevic, André L.
Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the hulc trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3921-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hegerpatrick herniareductionfollowinglaparotomyusingsmallstitchabdominalwallclosurewithandwithoutmeshaugmentationthehulctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT feißtmanuel herniareductionfollowinglaparotomyusingsmallstitchabdominalwallclosurewithandwithoutmeshaugmentationthehulctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT krisamjohannes herniareductionfollowinglaparotomyusingsmallstitchabdominalwallclosurewithandwithoutmeshaugmentationthehulctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT klosechristina herniareductionfollowinglaparotomyusingsmallstitchabdominalwallclosurewithandwithoutmeshaugmentationthehulctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dorrharimcolette herniareductionfollowinglaparotomyusingsmallstitchabdominalwallclosurewithandwithoutmeshaugmentationthehulctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tenckhoffsolveig herniareductionfollowinglaparotomyusingsmallstitchabdominalwallclosurewithandwithoutmeshaugmentationthehulctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT buchlermarkusw herniareductionfollowinglaparotomyusingsmallstitchabdominalwallclosurewithandwithoutmeshaugmentationthehulctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dienermarkusk herniareductionfollowinglaparotomyusingsmallstitchabdominalwallclosurewithandwithoutmeshaugmentationthehulctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mihaljevicandrel herniareductionfollowinglaparotomyusingsmallstitchabdominalwallclosurewithandwithoutmeshaugmentationthehulctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial