Cargando…

Clinical method evaluation of hemoglobin S and C identification by top-down selected reaction monitoring and electron transfer dissociation

BACKGROUND: Biological diagnosis of hemoglobin disorders is a complex process relying on the combination of several analytical techniques to identify Hb variants in a particular sample. Currently, hematology laboratories usually use high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), capillary electropho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lassout, Olivier, Hartmer, Ralf, Jabs, Wolfgang, Clerici, Lorella, Tsybin, Yury O., Samii, Kaveh, Vuilleumier, Nicolas, Hochstrasser, Denis, Scherl, Alexander, Lescuyer, Pierre, Coelho Graça, Didia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31889938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12014-019-9261-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Biological diagnosis of hemoglobin disorders is a complex process relying on the combination of several analytical techniques to identify Hb variants in a particular sample. Currently, hematology laboratories usually use high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), capillary electrophoresis and gel-based methods to characterize Hb variants. Co-elution and co-migration may represent major issues for precise identification of Hb variants, even for the most common ones such as Hb S and C. METHODS: We adapted a top-down selected reaction monitoring (SRM) electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry (MS) method to fit with a clinical laboratory environment. An automated analytical process with semi-automated data analysis compatible with a clinical practice was developed. A comparative study between a reference HPLC method and the MS assay was performed on 152 patient samples. RESULTS: The developed workflow allowed to identify with high specificity and selectivity the most common Hb variants (Hb S and Hb C). Concordance of the MS-based approach with HPLC was 71/71 (100%) for Hb S and 11/11 (100%) for Hb C. CONCLUSIONS: This top-down SRM ETD method can be used in a clinical environment to detect Hb S and Hb C.