Cargando…

Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership

The importance of linking evidence into practice and policy is recognised as a key pillar of a prudent approach to healthcare; it is of importance to healthcare professionals and decision-makers across the world in every speciality. However, rapid access to evidence to support service redesign, or t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mann, Mala, Woodward, Amanda, Nelson, Annmarie, Byrne, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0504-4
_version_ 1783480141549142016
author Mann, Mala
Woodward, Amanda
Nelson, Annmarie
Byrne, Anthony
author_facet Mann, Mala
Woodward, Amanda
Nelson, Annmarie
Byrne, Anthony
author_sort Mann, Mala
collection PubMed
description The importance of linking evidence into practice and policy is recognised as a key pillar of a prudent approach to healthcare; it is of importance to healthcare professionals and decision-makers across the world in every speciality. However, rapid access to evidence to support service redesign, or to change practice at pace, is challenging. This is particularly so in smaller specialties such as Palliative Care, where pressured multidisciplinary clinicians lack time and skill sets to locate and appraise the literature relevant to a particular area. Therefore, we have initiated the Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS), a knowledge transfer partnership through which we have developed a clear methodology to conduct evidence reviews to support professionals and other decision-makers working in palliative care. PaCERS methodology utilises modified systematic review methods as there is no agreed definition or an accepted methodology for conducting rapid reviews. This paper describes the stages involved based on our iterative recent experiences and engagement with stakeholders, who are the potential beneficiaries of the research. Uniquely, we emphasise the process and opportunities of engagement with the clinical workforce and policy-makers throughout the review, from developing and refining the review question at the start through to the importance of demonstrating impact. We are faced with the challenge of the trade-off between the timely transfer of evidence against the risk of impacting on rigour. To address this issue, we try to ensure transparency throughout the review process. Our methodology aligns with key principles of knowledge synthesis in defining a process that is transparent, robust and improving the efficiency and timeliness of the review. Our reviews are clinically or policy driven and, although we use modified systematic review methods, one of the key differences between published review processes and our review process is in our relationship with the requester. This streamlining approach to synthesising evidence in a timely manner helps to inform decisions faced by clinicians and decision-makers in healthcare settings, supporting, at pace, knowledge transfer and mobilisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6916007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69160072019-12-30 Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership Mann, Mala Woodward, Amanda Nelson, Annmarie Byrne, Anthony Health Res Policy Syst Commentary The importance of linking evidence into practice and policy is recognised as a key pillar of a prudent approach to healthcare; it is of importance to healthcare professionals and decision-makers across the world in every speciality. However, rapid access to evidence to support service redesign, or to change practice at pace, is challenging. This is particularly so in smaller specialties such as Palliative Care, where pressured multidisciplinary clinicians lack time and skill sets to locate and appraise the literature relevant to a particular area. Therefore, we have initiated the Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS), a knowledge transfer partnership through which we have developed a clear methodology to conduct evidence reviews to support professionals and other decision-makers working in palliative care. PaCERS methodology utilises modified systematic review methods as there is no agreed definition or an accepted methodology for conducting rapid reviews. This paper describes the stages involved based on our iterative recent experiences and engagement with stakeholders, who are the potential beneficiaries of the research. Uniquely, we emphasise the process and opportunities of engagement with the clinical workforce and policy-makers throughout the review, from developing and refining the review question at the start through to the importance of demonstrating impact. We are faced with the challenge of the trade-off between the timely transfer of evidence against the risk of impacting on rigour. To address this issue, we try to ensure transparency throughout the review process. Our methodology aligns with key principles of knowledge synthesis in defining a process that is transparent, robust and improving the efficiency and timeliness of the review. Our reviews are clinically or policy driven and, although we use modified systematic review methods, one of the key differences between published review processes and our review process is in our relationship with the requester. This streamlining approach to synthesising evidence in a timely manner helps to inform decisions faced by clinicians and decision-makers in healthcare settings, supporting, at pace, knowledge transfer and mobilisation. BioMed Central 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6916007/ /pubmed/31842886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0504-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Mann, Mala
Woodward, Amanda
Nelson, Annmarie
Byrne, Anthony
Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership
title Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership
title_full Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership
title_fullStr Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership
title_full_unstemmed Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership
title_short Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership
title_sort palliative care evidence review service (pacers): a knowledge transfer partnership
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0504-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mannmala palliativecareevidencereviewservicepacersaknowledgetransferpartnership
AT woodwardamanda palliativecareevidencereviewservicepacersaknowledgetransferpartnership
AT nelsonannmarie palliativecareevidencereviewservicepacersaknowledgetransferpartnership
AT byrneanthony palliativecareevidencereviewservicepacersaknowledgetransferpartnership