Cargando…
The impact of intensive care unit diaries on patients’ and relatives’ outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Memory gaps in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors are associated with psychiatric disorders. The ICU diaries improve the patient’s factual memory of the ICU, but it is not clear if they reduce the incidence of psychiatric disorders in patients and relatives after hospital discharge. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2678-0 |
_version_ | 1783480142516977664 |
---|---|
author | Barreto, Bruna Brandao Luz, Mariana Rios, Marcos Nogueira de Oliveira Lopes, Antonio Alberto Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri |
author_facet | Barreto, Bruna Brandao Luz, Mariana Rios, Marcos Nogueira de Oliveira Lopes, Antonio Alberto Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri |
author_sort | Barreto, Bruna Brandao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Memory gaps in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors are associated with psychiatric disorders. The ICU diaries improve the patient’s factual memory of the ICU, but it is not clear if they reduce the incidence of psychiatric disorders in patients and relatives after hospital discharge. The aim of this study is to evaluate the literature on the effect of ICU diaries for patients admitted in ICU and their relatives. METHODS: Two authors independently searched the online databases PubMed, OVID, Embase, EBSCO host, and PsycINFO from inception to July 2019. Studies were included if the intervention group (ICU diary) was compared with a group with no diaries and the sample was comprised patients ≥ 18 years old admitted in the ICU for more than 24 h and their relatives. Randomized clinical trials, observational studies, letter with original data, and abstracts were included, irrespective of the language. The search was not limited by any specific outcome. Review articles, commentaries, editorials, and studies without a control group were excluded. Structured tools were used to assess the methodological quality (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I)” for cohort studies and the “Cochrane Risk of Bias tool” for included RCTs and before/after studies). A random-effects model was employed considering the anticipated variability between the studies. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty-five titles were identified for screening. Two additional studies were selected after a reference search, and after a full-text review, a total of 12 studies were included. When pooling the results, ICU diary was associated with lower risk of depression (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23–0.75) and better quality of life (10.3 points higher in SF-36 general health score, 95% CI 0.79–19.8), without a decrease in anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). For the relatives receiving an ICU diary, there was no difference in the incidence of PTSD, anxiety, or depression. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review and meta-analysis supports the use of ICU diaries to reduce the risk of depression and preserve the quality of life of patients after ICU admission. ICU diaries do not seem to have any beneficial effect on the relatives of the patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42019136639 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6916011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69160112019-12-30 The impact of intensive care unit diaries on patients’ and relatives’ outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Barreto, Bruna Brandao Luz, Mariana Rios, Marcos Nogueira de Oliveira Lopes, Antonio Alberto Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Memory gaps in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors are associated with psychiatric disorders. The ICU diaries improve the patient’s factual memory of the ICU, but it is not clear if they reduce the incidence of psychiatric disorders in patients and relatives after hospital discharge. The aim of this study is to evaluate the literature on the effect of ICU diaries for patients admitted in ICU and their relatives. METHODS: Two authors independently searched the online databases PubMed, OVID, Embase, EBSCO host, and PsycINFO from inception to July 2019. Studies were included if the intervention group (ICU diary) was compared with a group with no diaries and the sample was comprised patients ≥ 18 years old admitted in the ICU for more than 24 h and their relatives. Randomized clinical trials, observational studies, letter with original data, and abstracts were included, irrespective of the language. The search was not limited by any specific outcome. Review articles, commentaries, editorials, and studies without a control group were excluded. Structured tools were used to assess the methodological quality (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I)” for cohort studies and the “Cochrane Risk of Bias tool” for included RCTs and before/after studies). A random-effects model was employed considering the anticipated variability between the studies. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty-five titles were identified for screening. Two additional studies were selected after a reference search, and after a full-text review, a total of 12 studies were included. When pooling the results, ICU diary was associated with lower risk of depression (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23–0.75) and better quality of life (10.3 points higher in SF-36 general health score, 95% CI 0.79–19.8), without a decrease in anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). For the relatives receiving an ICU diary, there was no difference in the incidence of PTSD, anxiety, or depression. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review and meta-analysis supports the use of ICU diaries to reduce the risk of depression and preserve the quality of life of patients after ICU admission. ICU diaries do not seem to have any beneficial effect on the relatives of the patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42019136639 BioMed Central 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6916011/ /pubmed/31842929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2678-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Barreto, Bruna Brandao Luz, Mariana Rios, Marcos Nogueira de Oliveira Lopes, Antonio Alberto Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri The impact of intensive care unit diaries on patients’ and relatives’ outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The impact of intensive care unit diaries on patients’ and relatives’ outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The impact of intensive care unit diaries on patients’ and relatives’ outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The impact of intensive care unit diaries on patients’ and relatives’ outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of intensive care unit diaries on patients’ and relatives’ outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The impact of intensive care unit diaries on patients’ and relatives’ outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | impact of intensive care unit diaries on patients’ and relatives’ outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2678-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barretobrunabrandao theimpactofintensivecareunitdiariesonpatientsandrelativesoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luzmariana theimpactofintensivecareunitdiariesonpatientsandrelativesoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT riosmarcosnogueiradeoliveira theimpactofintensivecareunitdiariesonpatientsandrelativesoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lopesantonioalberto theimpactofintensivecareunitdiariesonpatientsandrelativesoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gusmaofloresdimitri theimpactofintensivecareunitdiariesonpatientsandrelativesoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT barretobrunabrandao impactofintensivecareunitdiariesonpatientsandrelativesoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luzmariana impactofintensivecareunitdiariesonpatientsandrelativesoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT riosmarcosnogueiradeoliveira impactofintensivecareunitdiariesonpatientsandrelativesoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lopesantonioalberto impactofintensivecareunitdiariesonpatientsandrelativesoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gusmaofloresdimitri impactofintensivecareunitdiariesonpatientsandrelativesoutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |