Cargando…

New hemostatic device for grade IV–V liver injury in porcine model: a proof of concept

BACKGROUND: The liver is the most injured organ following abdominal trauma. Uncontrolled bleeding remains the main cause of early liver injury-related death, with a mortality rate of 50–54% in the first 24 h after admission and with 80% of operative deaths. Packing and reoperation account for the in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Segura-Sampedro, Juan José, Pineño-Flores, Cristina, Craus-Miguel, Andrea, Morales-Soriano, Rafael, González-Argente, Francesc Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31889989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0277-7
_version_ 1783480163840819200
author Segura-Sampedro, Juan José
Pineño-Flores, Cristina
Craus-Miguel, Andrea
Morales-Soriano, Rafael
González-Argente, Francesc Xavier
author_facet Segura-Sampedro, Juan José
Pineño-Flores, Cristina
Craus-Miguel, Andrea
Morales-Soriano, Rafael
González-Argente, Francesc Xavier
author_sort Segura-Sampedro, Juan José
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The liver is the most injured organ following abdominal trauma. Uncontrolled bleeding remains the main cause of early liver injury-related death, with a mortality rate of 50–54% in the first 24 h after admission and with 80% of operative deaths. Packing and reoperation account for the increased survival in severe liver trauma, and they are recommended for severe liver injuries (grades IV–V). Perihepatic packing can lead to several potential complications. An excessive packing can cause complications due to abdominal compartment syndrome, while a soft packing may be ineffective, and thus, bleeding can continue inadvertently with the consequent hypovolemic shock and potentially death. METHODS: We designed a new vacuum-based device to perform perihepatic packing without the negative side-effects of the classic technique. We conducted a prospective pilot feasibility study in a porcine model. We compared the traditional perihepatic packing (PHP) (n = 2) with the new VacBagPack device (VBP) (n = 2). RESULTS: Both pigs survived with the new device and showed an equivalent outcome to the one that survived in the traditional technique group. Blood tests were similar too. This suggests that VBP could be at least as effective as traditional PHP. CONCLUSIONS: We establish a first step towards the development of a new packing device. A new study with a bigger sample size still in pigs will be conducted. Also, an industrial model of the device is currently in production.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6916102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69161022019-12-30 New hemostatic device for grade IV–V liver injury in porcine model: a proof of concept Segura-Sampedro, Juan José Pineño-Flores, Cristina Craus-Miguel, Andrea Morales-Soriano, Rafael González-Argente, Francesc Xavier World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The liver is the most injured organ following abdominal trauma. Uncontrolled bleeding remains the main cause of early liver injury-related death, with a mortality rate of 50–54% in the first 24 h after admission and with 80% of operative deaths. Packing and reoperation account for the increased survival in severe liver trauma, and they are recommended for severe liver injuries (grades IV–V). Perihepatic packing can lead to several potential complications. An excessive packing can cause complications due to abdominal compartment syndrome, while a soft packing may be ineffective, and thus, bleeding can continue inadvertently with the consequent hypovolemic shock and potentially death. METHODS: We designed a new vacuum-based device to perform perihepatic packing without the negative side-effects of the classic technique. We conducted a prospective pilot feasibility study in a porcine model. We compared the traditional perihepatic packing (PHP) (n = 2) with the new VacBagPack device (VBP) (n = 2). RESULTS: Both pigs survived with the new device and showed an equivalent outcome to the one that survived in the traditional technique group. Blood tests were similar too. This suggests that VBP could be at least as effective as traditional PHP. CONCLUSIONS: We establish a first step towards the development of a new packing device. A new study with a bigger sample size still in pigs will be conducted. Also, an industrial model of the device is currently in production. BioMed Central 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6916102/ /pubmed/31889989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0277-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Segura-Sampedro, Juan José
Pineño-Flores, Cristina
Craus-Miguel, Andrea
Morales-Soriano, Rafael
González-Argente, Francesc Xavier
New hemostatic device for grade IV–V liver injury in porcine model: a proof of concept
title New hemostatic device for grade IV–V liver injury in porcine model: a proof of concept
title_full New hemostatic device for grade IV–V liver injury in porcine model: a proof of concept
title_fullStr New hemostatic device for grade IV–V liver injury in porcine model: a proof of concept
title_full_unstemmed New hemostatic device for grade IV–V liver injury in porcine model: a proof of concept
title_short New hemostatic device for grade IV–V liver injury in porcine model: a proof of concept
title_sort new hemostatic device for grade iv–v liver injury in porcine model: a proof of concept
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31889989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0277-7
work_keys_str_mv AT segurasampedrojuanjose newhemostaticdeviceforgradeivvliverinjuryinporcinemodelaproofofconcept
AT pinenoflorescristina newhemostaticdeviceforgradeivvliverinjuryinporcinemodelaproofofconcept
AT crausmiguelandrea newhemostaticdeviceforgradeivvliverinjuryinporcinemodelaproofofconcept
AT moralessorianorafael newhemostaticdeviceforgradeivvliverinjuryinporcinemodelaproofofconcept
AT gonzalezargentefrancescxavier newhemostaticdeviceforgradeivvliverinjuryinporcinemodelaproofofconcept