Cargando…
Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity
BACKGROUND: Grazing is an important land use in northern China. In general, different grazing intensities had a different impact on the morphological and physiological traits of plants, and especially their photosynthetic capacity. We investigated the responses of Leymus chinensis to light, medium,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2184-1 |
_version_ | 1783480187615182848 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Min Gong, Jirui Yang, Bo Ding, Yong Zhang, Zihe Wang, Biao Zhu, Chenchen Hou, Xiangyang |
author_facet | Liu, Min Gong, Jirui Yang, Bo Ding, Yong Zhang, Zihe Wang, Biao Zhu, Chenchen Hou, Xiangyang |
author_sort | Liu, Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Grazing is an important land use in northern China. In general, different grazing intensities had a different impact on the morphological and physiological traits of plants, and especially their photosynthetic capacity. We investigated the responses of Leymus chinensis to light, medium, and heavy grazing intensities in comparison with a grazing exclusion control. RESULTS: With light grazing, L. chinensis showed decreased photosynthetic capacity. The low chlorophyll and carotenoid contents constrained light energy transformation and dissipation, and Rubisco activity was also low, restricting the carboxylation efficiency. In addition, the damaged photosynthetic apparatus accumulated reactive oxygen species (ROS). With medium grazing, more energy was used for thermal dissipation, with high carotene content and high non-photochemical quenching, whereas photosynthetic electron transport was lowest. Significantly decreased photosynthesis decreased leaf C contents. Plants decreased the risk caused by ROS through increased energy dissipation. With high grazing intensity, plants changed their strategy to improve survival through photosynthetic compensation. More energy was allocated to photosynthetic electron transport. Though heavy grazing damaged the chloroplast ultrastructure, adjustment of internal mechanisms increased compensatory photosynthesis, and an increased tiller number facilitated regrowth after grazing. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the plants adopted different strategies by adjusting their metabolism and growth in response to their changing environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6916219 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69162192019-12-30 Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity Liu, Min Gong, Jirui Yang, Bo Ding, Yong Zhang, Zihe Wang, Biao Zhu, Chenchen Hou, Xiangyang BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Grazing is an important land use in northern China. In general, different grazing intensities had a different impact on the morphological and physiological traits of plants, and especially their photosynthetic capacity. We investigated the responses of Leymus chinensis to light, medium, and heavy grazing intensities in comparison with a grazing exclusion control. RESULTS: With light grazing, L. chinensis showed decreased photosynthetic capacity. The low chlorophyll and carotenoid contents constrained light energy transformation and dissipation, and Rubisco activity was also low, restricting the carboxylation efficiency. In addition, the damaged photosynthetic apparatus accumulated reactive oxygen species (ROS). With medium grazing, more energy was used for thermal dissipation, with high carotene content and high non-photochemical quenching, whereas photosynthetic electron transport was lowest. Significantly decreased photosynthesis decreased leaf C contents. Plants decreased the risk caused by ROS through increased energy dissipation. With high grazing intensity, plants changed their strategy to improve survival through photosynthetic compensation. More energy was allocated to photosynthetic electron transport. Though heavy grazing damaged the chloroplast ultrastructure, adjustment of internal mechanisms increased compensatory photosynthesis, and an increased tiller number facilitated regrowth after grazing. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the plants adopted different strategies by adjusting their metabolism and growth in response to their changing environment. BioMed Central 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6916219/ /pubmed/31842774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2184-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Min Gong, Jirui Yang, Bo Ding, Yong Zhang, Zihe Wang, Biao Zhu, Chenchen Hou, Xiangyang Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity |
title | Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity |
title_full | Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity |
title_fullStr | Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity |
title_short | Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity |
title_sort | differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2184-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liumin differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity AT gongjirui differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity AT yangbo differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity AT dingyong differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity AT zhangzihe differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity AT wangbiao differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity AT zhuchenchen differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity AT houxiangyang differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity |