Cargando…

Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity

BACKGROUND: Grazing is an important land use in northern China. In general, different grazing intensities had a different impact on the morphological and physiological traits of plants, and especially their photosynthetic capacity. We investigated the responses of Leymus chinensis to light, medium,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Min, Gong, Jirui, Yang, Bo, Ding, Yong, Zhang, Zihe, Wang, Biao, Zhu, Chenchen, Hou, Xiangyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2184-1
_version_ 1783480187615182848
author Liu, Min
Gong, Jirui
Yang, Bo
Ding, Yong
Zhang, Zihe
Wang, Biao
Zhu, Chenchen
Hou, Xiangyang
author_facet Liu, Min
Gong, Jirui
Yang, Bo
Ding, Yong
Zhang, Zihe
Wang, Biao
Zhu, Chenchen
Hou, Xiangyang
author_sort Liu, Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Grazing is an important land use in northern China. In general, different grazing intensities had a different impact on the morphological and physiological traits of plants, and especially their photosynthetic capacity. We investigated the responses of Leymus chinensis to light, medium, and heavy grazing intensities in comparison with a grazing exclusion control. RESULTS: With light grazing, L. chinensis showed decreased photosynthetic capacity. The low chlorophyll and carotenoid contents constrained light energy transformation and dissipation, and Rubisco activity was also low, restricting the carboxylation efficiency. In addition, the damaged photosynthetic apparatus accumulated reactive oxygen species (ROS). With medium grazing, more energy was used for thermal dissipation, with high carotene content and high non-photochemical quenching, whereas photosynthetic electron transport was lowest. Significantly decreased photosynthesis decreased leaf C contents. Plants decreased the risk caused by ROS through increased energy dissipation. With high grazing intensity, plants changed their strategy to improve survival through photosynthetic compensation. More energy was allocated to photosynthetic electron transport. Though heavy grazing damaged the chloroplast ultrastructure, adjustment of internal mechanisms increased compensatory photosynthesis, and an increased tiller number facilitated regrowth after grazing. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the plants adopted different strategies by adjusting their metabolism and growth in response to their changing environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6916219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69162192019-12-30 Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity Liu, Min Gong, Jirui Yang, Bo Ding, Yong Zhang, Zihe Wang, Biao Zhu, Chenchen Hou, Xiangyang BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Grazing is an important land use in northern China. In general, different grazing intensities had a different impact on the morphological and physiological traits of plants, and especially their photosynthetic capacity. We investigated the responses of Leymus chinensis to light, medium, and heavy grazing intensities in comparison with a grazing exclusion control. RESULTS: With light grazing, L. chinensis showed decreased photosynthetic capacity. The low chlorophyll and carotenoid contents constrained light energy transformation and dissipation, and Rubisco activity was also low, restricting the carboxylation efficiency. In addition, the damaged photosynthetic apparatus accumulated reactive oxygen species (ROS). With medium grazing, more energy was used for thermal dissipation, with high carotene content and high non-photochemical quenching, whereas photosynthetic electron transport was lowest. Significantly decreased photosynthesis decreased leaf C contents. Plants decreased the risk caused by ROS through increased energy dissipation. With high grazing intensity, plants changed their strategy to improve survival through photosynthetic compensation. More energy was allocated to photosynthetic electron transport. Though heavy grazing damaged the chloroplast ultrastructure, adjustment of internal mechanisms increased compensatory photosynthesis, and an increased tiller number facilitated regrowth after grazing. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the plants adopted different strategies by adjusting their metabolism and growth in response to their changing environment. BioMed Central 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6916219/ /pubmed/31842774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2184-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Min
Gong, Jirui
Yang, Bo
Ding, Yong
Zhang, Zihe
Wang, Biao
Zhu, Chenchen
Hou, Xiangyang
Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity
title Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity
title_full Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity
title_fullStr Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity
title_short Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity
title_sort differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2184-1
work_keys_str_mv AT liumin differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity
AT gongjirui differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity
AT yangbo differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity
AT dingyong differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity
AT zhangzihe differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity
AT wangbiao differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity
AT zhuchenchen differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity
AT houxiangyang differencesinthephotosyntheticandphysiologicalresponsesofleymuschinensistodifferentlevelsofgrazingintensity