Cargando…

A systematic review showing the lack of diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower‐limb cellulitis

BACKGROUND: Cellulitis can be a difficult diagnosis to make. Furthermore, 31% of patients admitted from the emergency department with suspected lower‐limb cellulitis have been misdiagnosed, with incorrect treatment potentially resulting in avoidable hospital admission and the prescription of unneces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, M., Lee, S.I., Akyea, R.K., Grindlay, D., Francis, N., Levell, N.J., Smart, P., Kai, J., Thomas, K.S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30844076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17857
_version_ 1783480230251331584
author Patel, M.
Lee, S.I.
Akyea, R.K.
Grindlay, D.
Francis, N.
Levell, N.J.
Smart, P.
Kai, J.
Thomas, K.S.
author_facet Patel, M.
Lee, S.I.
Akyea, R.K.
Grindlay, D.
Francis, N.
Levell, N.J.
Smart, P.
Kai, J.
Thomas, K.S.
author_sort Patel, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cellulitis can be a difficult diagnosis to make. Furthermore, 31% of patients admitted from the emergency department with suspected lower‐limb cellulitis have been misdiagnosed, with incorrect treatment potentially resulting in avoidable hospital admission and the prescription of unnecessary antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify diagnostic criteria or tools that have been developed for lower‐limb cellulitis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases in May 2018, with the aim of describing diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower‐limb cellulitis, and we assessed the quality of the studies identified using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool. We included all types of study that described diagnostic criteria or tools. RESULTS: Eight observational studies were included. Five studies examined biochemical markers, two studies assessed imaging and one study developed a diagnostic decision model. All eight studies were considered to have a high risk for bias in at least one domain. The quantity and quality of available data was low and results could not be pooled owing to the heterogeneity of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of high‐quality publications describing criteria or tools for diagnosing lower‐limb cellulitis. Future studies using prospective designs, validated in both primary and secondary care settings, are needed. What's already known about this topic? Diagnosing lower‐limb cellulitis on first presentation is challenging. Approximately one in three patients admitted from the emergency department with suspected lower‐limb cellulitis do not have cellulitis and are given another diagnosis on discharge. Consequently, this results in potentially avoidable hospital admissions and the prescription of unnecessary antibiotics. There are no diagnostic criteria available for lower‐limb cellulitis in the U.K. What does this study add? This systematic review has identified a key research gap in the diagnosis of lower‐limb cellulitis. There is a current lack of robustly developed and validated diagnostic criteria or tools for use in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6916392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69163922019-12-23 A systematic review showing the lack of diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower‐limb cellulitis Patel, M. Lee, S.I. Akyea, R.K. Grindlay, D. Francis, N. Levell, N.J. Smart, P. Kai, J. Thomas, K.S. Br J Dermatol Evidence‐Based Dermatology BACKGROUND: Cellulitis can be a difficult diagnosis to make. Furthermore, 31% of patients admitted from the emergency department with suspected lower‐limb cellulitis have been misdiagnosed, with incorrect treatment potentially resulting in avoidable hospital admission and the prescription of unnecessary antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify diagnostic criteria or tools that have been developed for lower‐limb cellulitis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases in May 2018, with the aim of describing diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower‐limb cellulitis, and we assessed the quality of the studies identified using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool. We included all types of study that described diagnostic criteria or tools. RESULTS: Eight observational studies were included. Five studies examined biochemical markers, two studies assessed imaging and one study developed a diagnostic decision model. All eight studies were considered to have a high risk for bias in at least one domain. The quantity and quality of available data was low and results could not be pooled owing to the heterogeneity of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of high‐quality publications describing criteria or tools for diagnosing lower‐limb cellulitis. Future studies using prospective designs, validated in both primary and secondary care settings, are needed. What's already known about this topic? Diagnosing lower‐limb cellulitis on first presentation is challenging. Approximately one in three patients admitted from the emergency department with suspected lower‐limb cellulitis do not have cellulitis and are given another diagnosis on discharge. Consequently, this results in potentially avoidable hospital admissions and the prescription of unnecessary antibiotics. There are no diagnostic criteria available for lower‐limb cellulitis in the U.K. What does this study add? This systematic review has identified a key research gap in the diagnosis of lower‐limb cellulitis. There is a current lack of robustly developed and validated diagnostic criteria or tools for use in clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-28 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6916392/ /pubmed/30844076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17857 Text en © 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Evidence‐Based Dermatology
Patel, M.
Lee, S.I.
Akyea, R.K.
Grindlay, D.
Francis, N.
Levell, N.J.
Smart, P.
Kai, J.
Thomas, K.S.
A systematic review showing the lack of diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower‐limb cellulitis
title A systematic review showing the lack of diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower‐limb cellulitis
title_full A systematic review showing the lack of diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower‐limb cellulitis
title_fullStr A systematic review showing the lack of diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower‐limb cellulitis
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review showing the lack of diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower‐limb cellulitis
title_short A systematic review showing the lack of diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower‐limb cellulitis
title_sort systematic review showing the lack of diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower‐limb cellulitis
topic Evidence‐Based Dermatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30844076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17857
work_keys_str_mv AT patelm asystematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT leesi asystematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT akyeark asystematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT grindlayd asystematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT francisn asystematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT levellnj asystematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT smartp asystematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT kaij asystematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT thomasks asystematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT patelm systematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT leesi systematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT akyeark systematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT grindlayd systematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT francisn systematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT levellnj systematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT smartp systematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT kaij systematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis
AT thomasks systematicreviewshowingthelackofdiagnosticcriteriaandtoolsdevelopedforlowerlimbcellulitis