Cargando…

Longitudinal investigation of prognostic communication: Feasibility and acceptability of studying serial disease reevaluation conversations in children with high‐risk cancer

BACKGROUND: Prospective investigation of medical dialogue is considered the gold standard in prognostic communication research. To the authors' knowledge, the achievability of collecting mixed methods data across an evolving illness trajectory for children with cancer is unknown. METHODS: The o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaye, Erica C., Gattas, Melanie, Bluebond‐Langner, Myra, Baker, Justin N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32499
_version_ 1783480233473605632
author Kaye, Erica C.
Gattas, Melanie
Bluebond‐Langner, Myra
Baker, Justin N.
author_facet Kaye, Erica C.
Gattas, Melanie
Bluebond‐Langner, Myra
Baker, Justin N.
author_sort Kaye, Erica C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prospective investigation of medical dialogue is considered the gold standard in prognostic communication research. To the authors' knowledge, the achievability of collecting mixed methods data across an evolving illness trajectory for children with cancer is unknown. METHODS: The objective of the current study was to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of recording sequential medical discussions at disease reevaluation time points for children with high‐risk cancer. Mixed methods data (ie, surveys, interviews, checklists, and chart reviews) corresponding to each disease reevaluation conversation also were captured in real‐time for 34 patients across 24 months at an academic pediatric cancer center. RESULTS: All eligible oncology clinicians (65 of 65 clinicians; 100%) and the majority of eligible patient/parent dyads (34 of 41 dyads; 82.9%) enrolled on the study; of 200 disease reevaluation discussions, 185 discussions (92.5%) were recorded, totaling >3300 minutes of recorded medical dialogue. Longitudinal data were captured for 31 of 34 patient/parent dyads (91.2%). The vast majority of study materials were completed, including 138 of 139 nonverbal communication checklists (99.3%), all 49 oncologist surveys (100%), 40 of 49 parent surveys (81.6%), all 34 oncologist interviews (100%), and 24 of 34 parent interviews (70.6%). Only 1 parent reported participation to be a “very” distressing experience, no parents believed that their level of distress warranted speaking with a psychosocial provider, and the majority of parents (18 of 29 parents; 62.1%) described study participation as “somewhat” or “very” useful to them. CONCLUSIONS: The prospective, longitudinal investigation of prognostic communication using a mixed methods approach appears to be feasible and acceptable to clinicians, patients, and families. The study of sensitive content can be accomplished without causing undue participant burden or harm, thereby enabling further advancement of communication research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6916406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69164062019-12-23 Longitudinal investigation of prognostic communication: Feasibility and acceptability of studying serial disease reevaluation conversations in children with high‐risk cancer Kaye, Erica C. Gattas, Melanie Bluebond‐Langner, Myra Baker, Justin N. Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Prospective investigation of medical dialogue is considered the gold standard in prognostic communication research. To the authors' knowledge, the achievability of collecting mixed methods data across an evolving illness trajectory for children with cancer is unknown. METHODS: The objective of the current study was to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of recording sequential medical discussions at disease reevaluation time points for children with high‐risk cancer. Mixed methods data (ie, surveys, interviews, checklists, and chart reviews) corresponding to each disease reevaluation conversation also were captured in real‐time for 34 patients across 24 months at an academic pediatric cancer center. RESULTS: All eligible oncology clinicians (65 of 65 clinicians; 100%) and the majority of eligible patient/parent dyads (34 of 41 dyads; 82.9%) enrolled on the study; of 200 disease reevaluation discussions, 185 discussions (92.5%) were recorded, totaling >3300 minutes of recorded medical dialogue. Longitudinal data were captured for 31 of 34 patient/parent dyads (91.2%). The vast majority of study materials were completed, including 138 of 139 nonverbal communication checklists (99.3%), all 49 oncologist surveys (100%), 40 of 49 parent surveys (81.6%), all 34 oncologist interviews (100%), and 24 of 34 parent interviews (70.6%). Only 1 parent reported participation to be a “very” distressing experience, no parents believed that their level of distress warranted speaking with a psychosocial provider, and the majority of parents (18 of 29 parents; 62.1%) described study participation as “somewhat” or “very” useful to them. CONCLUSIONS: The prospective, longitudinal investigation of prognostic communication using a mixed methods approach appears to be feasible and acceptable to clinicians, patients, and families. The study of sensitive content can be accomplished without causing undue participant burden or harm, thereby enabling further advancement of communication research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-18 2020-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6916406/ /pubmed/31532566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32499 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kaye, Erica C.
Gattas, Melanie
Bluebond‐Langner, Myra
Baker, Justin N.
Longitudinal investigation of prognostic communication: Feasibility and acceptability of studying serial disease reevaluation conversations in children with high‐risk cancer
title Longitudinal investigation of prognostic communication: Feasibility and acceptability of studying serial disease reevaluation conversations in children with high‐risk cancer
title_full Longitudinal investigation of prognostic communication: Feasibility and acceptability of studying serial disease reevaluation conversations in children with high‐risk cancer
title_fullStr Longitudinal investigation of prognostic communication: Feasibility and acceptability of studying serial disease reevaluation conversations in children with high‐risk cancer
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal investigation of prognostic communication: Feasibility and acceptability of studying serial disease reevaluation conversations in children with high‐risk cancer
title_short Longitudinal investigation of prognostic communication: Feasibility and acceptability of studying serial disease reevaluation conversations in children with high‐risk cancer
title_sort longitudinal investigation of prognostic communication: feasibility and acceptability of studying serial disease reevaluation conversations in children with high‐risk cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32499
work_keys_str_mv AT kayeericac longitudinalinvestigationofprognosticcommunicationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstudyingserialdiseasereevaluationconversationsinchildrenwithhighriskcancer
AT gattasmelanie longitudinalinvestigationofprognosticcommunicationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstudyingserialdiseasereevaluationconversationsinchildrenwithhighriskcancer
AT bluebondlangnermyra longitudinalinvestigationofprognosticcommunicationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstudyingserialdiseasereevaluationconversationsinchildrenwithhighriskcancer
AT bakerjustinn longitudinalinvestigationofprognosticcommunicationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofstudyingserialdiseasereevaluationconversationsinchildrenwithhighriskcancer