Cargando…

Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B

Treatment of haemophilia A/B patients comprises factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) concentrate replacement therapy, respectively. FVIII and FIX activity levels can be measured in clinical laboratories using one‐stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)‐based clotting or two‐stage chromo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marlar, Richard A., Strandberg, Karin, Shima, Midori, Adcock, Dorothy M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31606899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13339
_version_ 1783480235386208256
author Marlar, Richard A.
Strandberg, Karin
Shima, Midori
Adcock, Dorothy M.
author_facet Marlar, Richard A.
Strandberg, Karin
Shima, Midori
Adcock, Dorothy M.
author_sort Marlar, Richard A.
collection PubMed
description Treatment of haemophilia A/B patients comprises factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) concentrate replacement therapy, respectively. FVIII and FIX activity levels can be measured in clinical laboratories using one‐stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)‐based clotting or two‐stage chromogenic factor activity assays. We discuss strengths and limitations of these assays, providing examples of clinical scenarios to highlight some of the challenges associated with their current use for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. Substantial inter‐laboratory variability has been reported for one‐stage assays when measuring the activity of factor replacement products due to the wide range of currently available aPTT reagents, calibration standards, factor‐deficient plasmas, assay conditions and instruments. Chromogenic activity assays may avoid some limitations associated with one‐stage assays, but their regulatory status, perceived higher cost, and lack of laboratory expertise may influence their use. Haemophilia management guidelines recommend the differential application of one or both assays for initial diagnosis and disease severity characterisation, post‐infusion monitoring and replacement factor potency labelling. Efficient communication between clinical and laboratory staff is crucial to ensure application of the most appropriate assay to each clinical situation, correct interpretation of assay results and, ultimately, accurate diagnosis and optimal and safe treatment of haemophilia A or B patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6916414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69164142019-12-23 Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B Marlar, Richard A. Strandberg, Karin Shima, Midori Adcock, Dorothy M. Eur J Haematol Review Articles Treatment of haemophilia A/B patients comprises factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) concentrate replacement therapy, respectively. FVIII and FIX activity levels can be measured in clinical laboratories using one‐stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)‐based clotting or two‐stage chromogenic factor activity assays. We discuss strengths and limitations of these assays, providing examples of clinical scenarios to highlight some of the challenges associated with their current use for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. Substantial inter‐laboratory variability has been reported for one‐stage assays when measuring the activity of factor replacement products due to the wide range of currently available aPTT reagents, calibration standards, factor‐deficient plasmas, assay conditions and instruments. Chromogenic activity assays may avoid some limitations associated with one‐stage assays, but their regulatory status, perceived higher cost, and lack of laboratory expertise may influence their use. Haemophilia management guidelines recommend the differential application of one or both assays for initial diagnosis and disease severity characterisation, post‐infusion monitoring and replacement factor potency labelling. Efficient communication between clinical and laboratory staff is crucial to ensure application of the most appropriate assay to each clinical situation, correct interpretation of assay results and, ultimately, accurate diagnosis and optimal and safe treatment of haemophilia A or B patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-13 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6916414/ /pubmed/31606899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13339 Text en © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Marlar, Richard A.
Strandberg, Karin
Shima, Midori
Adcock, Dorothy M.
Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B
title Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B
title_full Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B
title_fullStr Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B
title_short Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B
title_sort clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia a and b
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31606899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13339
work_keys_str_mv AT marlarricharda clinicalutilityandimpactoftheuseofthechromogenicvsonestagefactoractivityassaysinhaemophiliaaandb
AT strandbergkarin clinicalutilityandimpactoftheuseofthechromogenicvsonestagefactoractivityassaysinhaemophiliaaandb
AT shimamidori clinicalutilityandimpactoftheuseofthechromogenicvsonestagefactoractivityassaysinhaemophiliaaandb
AT adcockdorothym clinicalutilityandimpactoftheuseofthechromogenicvsonestagefactoractivityassaysinhaemophiliaaandb