Cargando…
Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B
Treatment of haemophilia A/B patients comprises factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) concentrate replacement therapy, respectively. FVIII and FIX activity levels can be measured in clinical laboratories using one‐stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)‐based clotting or two‐stage chromo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31606899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13339 |
_version_ | 1783480235386208256 |
---|---|
author | Marlar, Richard A. Strandberg, Karin Shima, Midori Adcock, Dorothy M. |
author_facet | Marlar, Richard A. Strandberg, Karin Shima, Midori Adcock, Dorothy M. |
author_sort | Marlar, Richard A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Treatment of haemophilia A/B patients comprises factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) concentrate replacement therapy, respectively. FVIII and FIX activity levels can be measured in clinical laboratories using one‐stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)‐based clotting or two‐stage chromogenic factor activity assays. We discuss strengths and limitations of these assays, providing examples of clinical scenarios to highlight some of the challenges associated with their current use for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. Substantial inter‐laboratory variability has been reported for one‐stage assays when measuring the activity of factor replacement products due to the wide range of currently available aPTT reagents, calibration standards, factor‐deficient plasmas, assay conditions and instruments. Chromogenic activity assays may avoid some limitations associated with one‐stage assays, but their regulatory status, perceived higher cost, and lack of laboratory expertise may influence their use. Haemophilia management guidelines recommend the differential application of one or both assays for initial diagnosis and disease severity characterisation, post‐infusion monitoring and replacement factor potency labelling. Efficient communication between clinical and laboratory staff is crucial to ensure application of the most appropriate assay to each clinical situation, correct interpretation of assay results and, ultimately, accurate diagnosis and optimal and safe treatment of haemophilia A or B patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6916414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69164142019-12-23 Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B Marlar, Richard A. Strandberg, Karin Shima, Midori Adcock, Dorothy M. Eur J Haematol Review Articles Treatment of haemophilia A/B patients comprises factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) concentrate replacement therapy, respectively. FVIII and FIX activity levels can be measured in clinical laboratories using one‐stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)‐based clotting or two‐stage chromogenic factor activity assays. We discuss strengths and limitations of these assays, providing examples of clinical scenarios to highlight some of the challenges associated with their current use for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. Substantial inter‐laboratory variability has been reported for one‐stage assays when measuring the activity of factor replacement products due to the wide range of currently available aPTT reagents, calibration standards, factor‐deficient plasmas, assay conditions and instruments. Chromogenic activity assays may avoid some limitations associated with one‐stage assays, but their regulatory status, perceived higher cost, and lack of laboratory expertise may influence their use. Haemophilia management guidelines recommend the differential application of one or both assays for initial diagnosis and disease severity characterisation, post‐infusion monitoring and replacement factor potency labelling. Efficient communication between clinical and laboratory staff is crucial to ensure application of the most appropriate assay to each clinical situation, correct interpretation of assay results and, ultimately, accurate diagnosis and optimal and safe treatment of haemophilia A or B patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-13 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6916414/ /pubmed/31606899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13339 Text en © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Marlar, Richard A. Strandberg, Karin Shima, Midori Adcock, Dorothy M. Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B |
title | Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B |
title_full | Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B |
title_fullStr | Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B |
title_short | Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B |
title_sort | clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one‐stage factor activity assays in haemophilia a and b |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31606899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marlarricharda clinicalutilityandimpactoftheuseofthechromogenicvsonestagefactoractivityassaysinhaemophiliaaandb AT strandbergkarin clinicalutilityandimpactoftheuseofthechromogenicvsonestagefactoractivityassaysinhaemophiliaaandb AT shimamidori clinicalutilityandimpactoftheuseofthechromogenicvsonestagefactoractivityassaysinhaemophiliaaandb AT adcockdorothym clinicalutilityandimpactoftheuseofthechromogenicvsonestagefactoractivityassaysinhaemophiliaaandb |