Cargando…

Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure

Natural bone microstructure has shown to be the most efficient choice for the bone scaffold design. However, there are several process parameters involved in the generation of a microCT‐based 3D‐printed (3DP) bone. In this study, the effect of selected parameters on the reproducibility of mechanical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amini, Morteza, Reisinger, Andreas, Pahr, Dieter H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34363
_version_ 1783480275668303872
author Amini, Morteza
Reisinger, Andreas
Pahr, Dieter H.
author_facet Amini, Morteza
Reisinger, Andreas
Pahr, Dieter H.
author_sort Amini, Morteza
collection PubMed
description Natural bone microstructure has shown to be the most efficient choice for the bone scaffold design. However, there are several process parameters involved in the generation of a microCT‐based 3D‐printed (3DP) bone. In this study, the effect of selected parameters on the reproducibility of mechanical properties of a 3DP trabecular bone structure is investigated. MicroCT images of a distal radial sample were used to reconstruct a 3D ROI of trabecular bone. Nine tensile tests on bulk material and 54 compression tests on 8.2 mm cubic samples were performed (9 cases × 6 specimens/case). The effect of input‐image resolution, STL mesh decimation, boundary condition, support material, and repetition parameters on the weight, elastic modulus, and strength were studied. The elastic modulus and the strength of bulk material showed consistent results (CV% = 9 and 6%, respectively). The weight, elastic modulus, and strength of the cubic samples showed small intragroup variation (average CV% = 1.2, 9, and 5.5%, respectively). All studied parameters had a significant effect on the outcome variables with less effect on the weight. Utmost care to every step of the 3DP process and involved parameters is required to be able to reach the desired mechanical properties in the final printed specimen. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 108B:38–47, 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6916655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69166552019-12-23 Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure Amini, Morteza Reisinger, Andreas Pahr, Dieter H. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Original Research Reports Natural bone microstructure has shown to be the most efficient choice for the bone scaffold design. However, there are several process parameters involved in the generation of a microCT‐based 3D‐printed (3DP) bone. In this study, the effect of selected parameters on the reproducibility of mechanical properties of a 3DP trabecular bone structure is investigated. MicroCT images of a distal radial sample were used to reconstruct a 3D ROI of trabecular bone. Nine tensile tests on bulk material and 54 compression tests on 8.2 mm cubic samples were performed (9 cases × 6 specimens/case). The effect of input‐image resolution, STL mesh decimation, boundary condition, support material, and repetition parameters on the weight, elastic modulus, and strength were studied. The elastic modulus and the strength of bulk material showed consistent results (CV% = 9 and 6%, respectively). The weight, elastic modulus, and strength of the cubic samples showed small intragroup variation (average CV% = 1.2, 9, and 5.5%, respectively). All studied parameters had a significant effect on the outcome variables with less effect on the weight. Utmost care to every step of the 3DP process and involved parameters is required to be able to reach the desired mechanical properties in the final printed specimen. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 108B:38–47, 2020. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-03-20 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6916655/ /pubmed/30893513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34363 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research Reports
Amini, Morteza
Reisinger, Andreas
Pahr, Dieter H.
Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure
title Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure
title_full Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure
title_fullStr Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure
title_full_unstemmed Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure
title_short Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure
title_sort influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3d‐printed trabecular bone microstructure
topic Original Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34363
work_keys_str_mv AT aminimorteza influenceofprocessingparametersonmechanicalpropertiesofa3dprintedtrabecularbonemicrostructure
AT reisingerandreas influenceofprocessingparametersonmechanicalpropertiesofa3dprintedtrabecularbonemicrostructure
AT pahrdieterh influenceofprocessingparametersonmechanicalpropertiesofa3dprintedtrabecularbonemicrostructure