Cargando…
Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure
Natural bone microstructure has shown to be the most efficient choice for the bone scaffold design. However, there are several process parameters involved in the generation of a microCT‐based 3D‐printed (3DP) bone. In this study, the effect of selected parameters on the reproducibility of mechanical...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34363 |
_version_ | 1783480275668303872 |
---|---|
author | Amini, Morteza Reisinger, Andreas Pahr, Dieter H. |
author_facet | Amini, Morteza Reisinger, Andreas Pahr, Dieter H. |
author_sort | Amini, Morteza |
collection | PubMed |
description | Natural bone microstructure has shown to be the most efficient choice for the bone scaffold design. However, there are several process parameters involved in the generation of a microCT‐based 3D‐printed (3DP) bone. In this study, the effect of selected parameters on the reproducibility of mechanical properties of a 3DP trabecular bone structure is investigated. MicroCT images of a distal radial sample were used to reconstruct a 3D ROI of trabecular bone. Nine tensile tests on bulk material and 54 compression tests on 8.2 mm cubic samples were performed (9 cases × 6 specimens/case). The effect of input‐image resolution, STL mesh decimation, boundary condition, support material, and repetition parameters on the weight, elastic modulus, and strength were studied. The elastic modulus and the strength of bulk material showed consistent results (CV% = 9 and 6%, respectively). The weight, elastic modulus, and strength of the cubic samples showed small intragroup variation (average CV% = 1.2, 9, and 5.5%, respectively). All studied parameters had a significant effect on the outcome variables with less effect on the weight. Utmost care to every step of the 3DP process and involved parameters is required to be able to reach the desired mechanical properties in the final printed specimen. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 108B:38–47, 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6916655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69166552019-12-23 Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure Amini, Morteza Reisinger, Andreas Pahr, Dieter H. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Original Research Reports Natural bone microstructure has shown to be the most efficient choice for the bone scaffold design. However, there are several process parameters involved in the generation of a microCT‐based 3D‐printed (3DP) bone. In this study, the effect of selected parameters on the reproducibility of mechanical properties of a 3DP trabecular bone structure is investigated. MicroCT images of a distal radial sample were used to reconstruct a 3D ROI of trabecular bone. Nine tensile tests on bulk material and 54 compression tests on 8.2 mm cubic samples were performed (9 cases × 6 specimens/case). The effect of input‐image resolution, STL mesh decimation, boundary condition, support material, and repetition parameters on the weight, elastic modulus, and strength were studied. The elastic modulus and the strength of bulk material showed consistent results (CV% = 9 and 6%, respectively). The weight, elastic modulus, and strength of the cubic samples showed small intragroup variation (average CV% = 1.2, 9, and 5.5%, respectively). All studied parameters had a significant effect on the outcome variables with less effect on the weight. Utmost care to every step of the 3DP process and involved parameters is required to be able to reach the desired mechanical properties in the final printed specimen. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 108B:38–47, 2020. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-03-20 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6916655/ /pubmed/30893513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34363 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Reports Amini, Morteza Reisinger, Andreas Pahr, Dieter H. Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure |
title | Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure |
title_full | Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure |
title_fullStr | Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure |
title_short | Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D‐printed trabecular bone microstructure |
title_sort | influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3d‐printed trabecular bone microstructure |
topic | Original Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aminimorteza influenceofprocessingparametersonmechanicalpropertiesofa3dprintedtrabecularbonemicrostructure AT reisingerandreas influenceofprocessingparametersonmechanicalpropertiesofa3dprintedtrabecularbonemicrostructure AT pahrdieterh influenceofprocessingparametersonmechanicalpropertiesofa3dprintedtrabecularbonemicrostructure |