Cargando…
The Button Project: Using Chart Rounds for Teaching Clinical Ophthalmology with an Electronic Medical Record
OBJECTIVE: Chart rounds have traditionally been used effectively for clinical teaching in ophthalmology. The introduction of the electronic health record has altered practice patterns and some evidence suggests interference with resident education. The purpose of this study was to investigate the us...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853212 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S237076 |
_version_ | 1783480281083150336 |
---|---|
author | Rosdahl, Jullia A Zhang, Wenlan Manjunath, Varsha |
author_facet | Rosdahl, Jullia A Zhang, Wenlan Manjunath, Varsha |
author_sort | Rosdahl, Jullia A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Chart rounds have traditionally been used effectively for clinical teaching in ophthalmology. The introduction of the electronic health record has altered practice patterns and some evidence suggests interference with resident education. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of chart rounds in our ophthalmology department and to see if a simple intervention, an “education button”, could positively impact clinical teaching. DESIGN: We used a cross-sectional survey, and pre- and post-intervention surveys to assess the utility of an intervention – an “education button”. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology at Duke University, a tertiary care academic ophthalmology practice, in Durham, North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Ophthalmology trainees (37), including residents and clinical fellows, and clinical faculty (50) in the department were surveyed anonymously. The overall response rate for the cross-sectional survey was 83% (72/87). The overall response rate for the educational study was 53% for the first time-point and 59% for the second time-point. RESULTS: For the cross-sectional survey, trainees found chart rounds to be useful and would like to increase their frequency. Most faculty reported doing them regularly, although not having enough time was the most common barrier (76% of the faculty). In the pre- and post-assessment of the “education button” (overall response rate 53%), the overall impression was positive with the button easy to use, but the implementation of the button did not appear to change the quality or frequency of chart rounds; nor did it appear to have an effect on covering learning objectives. CONCLUSION: While the “education button” could help with communication between the faculty and trainees during a busy clinic session to identify cases for discussion, it did not address the most common barrier identified by faculty members, that of not having enough time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6916686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69166862019-12-18 The Button Project: Using Chart Rounds for Teaching Clinical Ophthalmology with an Electronic Medical Record Rosdahl, Jullia A Zhang, Wenlan Manjunath, Varsha Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research OBJECTIVE: Chart rounds have traditionally been used effectively for clinical teaching in ophthalmology. The introduction of the electronic health record has altered practice patterns and some evidence suggests interference with resident education. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of chart rounds in our ophthalmology department and to see if a simple intervention, an “education button”, could positively impact clinical teaching. DESIGN: We used a cross-sectional survey, and pre- and post-intervention surveys to assess the utility of an intervention – an “education button”. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology at Duke University, a tertiary care academic ophthalmology practice, in Durham, North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Ophthalmology trainees (37), including residents and clinical fellows, and clinical faculty (50) in the department were surveyed anonymously. The overall response rate for the cross-sectional survey was 83% (72/87). The overall response rate for the educational study was 53% for the first time-point and 59% for the second time-point. RESULTS: For the cross-sectional survey, trainees found chart rounds to be useful and would like to increase their frequency. Most faculty reported doing them regularly, although not having enough time was the most common barrier (76% of the faculty). In the pre- and post-assessment of the “education button” (overall response rate 53%), the overall impression was positive with the button easy to use, but the implementation of the button did not appear to change the quality or frequency of chart rounds; nor did it appear to have an effect on covering learning objectives. CONCLUSION: While the “education button” could help with communication between the faculty and trainees during a busy clinic session to identify cases for discussion, it did not address the most common barrier identified by faculty members, that of not having enough time. Dove 2019-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6916686/ /pubmed/31853212 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S237076 Text en © 2019 Rosdahl et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rosdahl, Jullia A Zhang, Wenlan Manjunath, Varsha The Button Project: Using Chart Rounds for Teaching Clinical Ophthalmology with an Electronic Medical Record |
title | The Button Project: Using Chart Rounds for Teaching Clinical Ophthalmology with an Electronic Medical Record |
title_full | The Button Project: Using Chart Rounds for Teaching Clinical Ophthalmology with an Electronic Medical Record |
title_fullStr | The Button Project: Using Chart Rounds for Teaching Clinical Ophthalmology with an Electronic Medical Record |
title_full_unstemmed | The Button Project: Using Chart Rounds for Teaching Clinical Ophthalmology with an Electronic Medical Record |
title_short | The Button Project: Using Chart Rounds for Teaching Clinical Ophthalmology with an Electronic Medical Record |
title_sort | button project: using chart rounds for teaching clinical ophthalmology with an electronic medical record |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853212 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S237076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosdahljulliaa thebuttonprojectusingchartroundsforteachingclinicalophthalmologywithanelectronicmedicalrecord AT zhangwenlan thebuttonprojectusingchartroundsforteachingclinicalophthalmologywithanelectronicmedicalrecord AT manjunathvarsha thebuttonprojectusingchartroundsforteachingclinicalophthalmologywithanelectronicmedicalrecord AT rosdahljulliaa buttonprojectusingchartroundsforteachingclinicalophthalmologywithanelectronicmedicalrecord AT zhangwenlan buttonprojectusingchartroundsforteachingclinicalophthalmologywithanelectronicmedicalrecord AT manjunathvarsha buttonprojectusingchartroundsforteachingclinicalophthalmologywithanelectronicmedicalrecord |