Cargando…

Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic disorder resulting in pain and disability. An emerging treatment for CPSP is non-invasive brain stimulation including direct current stimulation [tDCS] and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS]. This systematic review analyzes t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramger, Benjamin Curtis, Bader, Kimberly Anne, Davies, Samantha Pauline, Stewart, David Andrew, Ledbetter, Leila Snow, Simon, Corey Brae, Feld, Jody Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853195
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S216081
_version_ 1783480284446982144
author Ramger, Benjamin Curtis
Bader, Kimberly Anne
Davies, Samantha Pauline
Stewart, David Andrew
Ledbetter, Leila Snow
Simon, Corey Brae
Feld, Jody Ann
author_facet Ramger, Benjamin Curtis
Bader, Kimberly Anne
Davies, Samantha Pauline
Stewart, David Andrew
Ledbetter, Leila Snow
Simon, Corey Brae
Feld, Jody Ann
author_sort Ramger, Benjamin Curtis
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic disorder resulting in pain and disability. An emerging treatment for CPSP is non-invasive brain stimulation including direct current stimulation [tDCS] and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS]. This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and quality of non-invasive brain stimulation intervention studies for CPSP. METHODS: Studies were sought from three research databases published between 2007 and 2017. Studies were included if the sole intervention was non-invasive brain stimulation and the primary outcome either clinical or experimental pain intensity. Studies were qualitatively assessed for risk of bias. RESULTS: Of 1107 articles extracted, six met eligibility criteria. Five studies found a decrease in pain intensity (p<0.05) immediately and 3 weeks after rTMS or tDCS was delivered over the primary motor cortex. For experimental pain, one study found thermal pain thresholds improved for those receiving tDCS compared to sham (p<0.05), while another found normalization of the cold detection threshold only after rTMS (p<0.05). Qualitative assessment revealed only one study rated as “excellent/good” quality, while the other five were rated as “fair” or “poor”. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive brain stimulation may have a therapeutic effect on pain level for individuals with CPSP, as evidenced by significant decreases in clinical and experimental pain scores. However, despite the impact of CPSP and the promise of non-invasive brain stimulation, few rigorous studies have been performed in this area. Future studies should aim to standardize treatment parameters, measure both clinical and experimental pain, and include long-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6916700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69167002019-12-18 Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review Ramger, Benjamin Curtis Bader, Kimberly Anne Davies, Samantha Pauline Stewart, David Andrew Ledbetter, Leila Snow Simon, Corey Brae Feld, Jody Ann J Pain Res Review PURPOSE: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic disorder resulting in pain and disability. An emerging treatment for CPSP is non-invasive brain stimulation including direct current stimulation [tDCS] and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS]. This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and quality of non-invasive brain stimulation intervention studies for CPSP. METHODS: Studies were sought from three research databases published between 2007 and 2017. Studies were included if the sole intervention was non-invasive brain stimulation and the primary outcome either clinical or experimental pain intensity. Studies were qualitatively assessed for risk of bias. RESULTS: Of 1107 articles extracted, six met eligibility criteria. Five studies found a decrease in pain intensity (p<0.05) immediately and 3 weeks after rTMS or tDCS was delivered over the primary motor cortex. For experimental pain, one study found thermal pain thresholds improved for those receiving tDCS compared to sham (p<0.05), while another found normalization of the cold detection threshold only after rTMS (p<0.05). Qualitative assessment revealed only one study rated as “excellent/good” quality, while the other five were rated as “fair” or “poor”. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive brain stimulation may have a therapeutic effect on pain level for individuals with CPSP, as evidenced by significant decreases in clinical and experimental pain scores. However, despite the impact of CPSP and the promise of non-invasive brain stimulation, few rigorous studies have been performed in this area. Future studies should aim to standardize treatment parameters, measure both clinical and experimental pain, and include long-term follow-up. Dove 2019-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6916700/ /pubmed/31853195 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S216081 Text en © 2019 Ramger et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Ramger, Benjamin Curtis
Bader, Kimberly Anne
Davies, Samantha Pauline
Stewart, David Andrew
Ledbetter, Leila Snow
Simon, Corey Brae
Feld, Jody Ann
Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review
title Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review
title_full Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review
title_short Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review
title_sort effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on clinical pain intensity and experimental pain sensitivity among individuals with central post-stroke pain: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853195
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S216081
work_keys_str_mv AT ramgerbenjamincurtis effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonclinicalpainintensityandexperimentalpainsensitivityamongindividualswithcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreview
AT baderkimberlyanne effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonclinicalpainintensityandexperimentalpainsensitivityamongindividualswithcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreview
AT daviessamanthapauline effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonclinicalpainintensityandexperimentalpainsensitivityamongindividualswithcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreview
AT stewartdavidandrew effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonclinicalpainintensityandexperimentalpainsensitivityamongindividualswithcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreview
AT ledbetterleilasnow effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonclinicalpainintensityandexperimentalpainsensitivityamongindividualswithcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreview
AT simoncoreybrae effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonclinicalpainintensityandexperimentalpainsensitivityamongindividualswithcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreview
AT feldjodyann effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonclinicalpainintensityandexperimentalpainsensitivityamongindividualswithcentralpoststrokepainasystematicreview