Cargando…

The Effect of Metal Instrumentation on Patient and Surgical Team Scatter Radiation Exposure Using Mini C-Arm in a Simulated Forearm Fracture Fixation Model

INTRODUCTION: To our knowledge, no studies have studied the effect of metal instrumentation (MI) in the field of fluoroscopy regarding changes in the intensity, direction of scatter, and degree of radiation exposure to the patient and surgical team. The goal of this study was to determine whether th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groover, Michael T., Hinkley, Jacob R., Gerow, Daniel E., Bamberger, H. Brent, Evans, Jennifer, Gazaille, Roland E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6917351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858073
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00089
_version_ 1783480397511786496
author Groover, Michael T.
Hinkley, Jacob R.
Gerow, Daniel E.
Bamberger, H. Brent
Evans, Jennifer
Gazaille, Roland E.
author_facet Groover, Michael T.
Hinkley, Jacob R.
Gerow, Daniel E.
Bamberger, H. Brent
Evans, Jennifer
Gazaille, Roland E.
author_sort Groover, Michael T.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To our knowledge, no studies have studied the effect of metal instrumentation (MI) in the field of fluoroscopy regarding changes in the intensity, direction of scatter, and degree of radiation exposure to the patient and surgical team. The goal of this study was to determine whether the presence of MI increases scatter radiation exposure to the patient and surgical team when using a mini C-arm in the horizontal and vertical positions. METHODS: Four trials were conducted using a lamb limb specimen and a mini C-arm to simulate a forearm/wrist fracture fixation scenario. Radiation scatter percentages were measured with the mini C-arm in a vertical and horizontal position with and without the presence of MI (a six-hole 3.5-mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate attached to the specimen with six cortical screws and a self-retaining retractor) using a parallel plate radiation detector. RESULTS: The patient, scrub technician, circulating nurse, and anesthesiologist were exposed to no detectable radiation. In the horizontal position with the presence of MI, there was a 181-fold increase in scatter radiation exposure to the first assistant's eyes (0.016% versus 2.893%, 1.4 × 10(−6) Sv/min versus 3.5 × 10(−5) Sv/min) and increased exposure to the surgeon's hands compared with the horizontal position with no MI. In the vertical position, the scatter radiation received by the first assistant's eyes increased (zero versus 2.9 × 10(−6) Sv/min) with MI present, whereas the only radiation measured for the surgeon was in the right hand which did not change with MI present (2.2 × 10(−5) Sv/min). DISCUSSION: MI in the field of fluoroscopy increases scatter radiation exposure to a degree that may place the first assistant's yearly eye exposure in excess of the International Commission on Radiological Protection limit. Surgeons and their assistants should wear lead aprons, thyroid shields, and leaded glasses and minimize the usage of fluoroscopy with MI in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6917351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69173512019-12-17 The Effect of Metal Instrumentation on Patient and Surgical Team Scatter Radiation Exposure Using Mini C-Arm in a Simulated Forearm Fracture Fixation Model Groover, Michael T. Hinkley, Jacob R. Gerow, Daniel E. Bamberger, H. Brent Evans, Jennifer Gazaille, Roland E. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article INTRODUCTION: To our knowledge, no studies have studied the effect of metal instrumentation (MI) in the field of fluoroscopy regarding changes in the intensity, direction of scatter, and degree of radiation exposure to the patient and surgical team. The goal of this study was to determine whether the presence of MI increases scatter radiation exposure to the patient and surgical team when using a mini C-arm in the horizontal and vertical positions. METHODS: Four trials were conducted using a lamb limb specimen and a mini C-arm to simulate a forearm/wrist fracture fixation scenario. Radiation scatter percentages were measured with the mini C-arm in a vertical and horizontal position with and without the presence of MI (a six-hole 3.5-mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate attached to the specimen with six cortical screws and a self-retaining retractor) using a parallel plate radiation detector. RESULTS: The patient, scrub technician, circulating nurse, and anesthesiologist were exposed to no detectable radiation. In the horizontal position with the presence of MI, there was a 181-fold increase in scatter radiation exposure to the first assistant's eyes (0.016% versus 2.893%, 1.4 × 10(−6) Sv/min versus 3.5 × 10(−5) Sv/min) and increased exposure to the surgeon's hands compared with the horizontal position with no MI. In the vertical position, the scatter radiation received by the first assistant's eyes increased (zero versus 2.9 × 10(−6) Sv/min) with MI present, whereas the only radiation measured for the surgeon was in the right hand which did not change with MI present (2.2 × 10(−5) Sv/min). DISCUSSION: MI in the field of fluoroscopy increases scatter radiation exposure to a degree that may place the first assistant's yearly eye exposure in excess of the International Commission on Radiological Protection limit. Surgeons and their assistants should wear lead aprons, thyroid shields, and leaded glasses and minimize the usage of fluoroscopy with MI in the field. Wolters Kluwer 2019-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6917351/ /pubmed/31858073 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00089 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
spellingShingle Research Article
Groover, Michael T.
Hinkley, Jacob R.
Gerow, Daniel E.
Bamberger, H. Brent
Evans, Jennifer
Gazaille, Roland E.
The Effect of Metal Instrumentation on Patient and Surgical Team Scatter Radiation Exposure Using Mini C-Arm in a Simulated Forearm Fracture Fixation Model
title The Effect of Metal Instrumentation on Patient and Surgical Team Scatter Radiation Exposure Using Mini C-Arm in a Simulated Forearm Fracture Fixation Model
title_full The Effect of Metal Instrumentation on Patient and Surgical Team Scatter Radiation Exposure Using Mini C-Arm in a Simulated Forearm Fracture Fixation Model
title_fullStr The Effect of Metal Instrumentation on Patient and Surgical Team Scatter Radiation Exposure Using Mini C-Arm in a Simulated Forearm Fracture Fixation Model
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Metal Instrumentation on Patient and Surgical Team Scatter Radiation Exposure Using Mini C-Arm in a Simulated Forearm Fracture Fixation Model
title_short The Effect of Metal Instrumentation on Patient and Surgical Team Scatter Radiation Exposure Using Mini C-Arm in a Simulated Forearm Fracture Fixation Model
title_sort effect of metal instrumentation on patient and surgical team scatter radiation exposure using mini c-arm in a simulated forearm fracture fixation model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6917351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858073
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00089
work_keys_str_mv AT groovermichaelt theeffectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel
AT hinkleyjacobr theeffectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel
AT gerowdaniele theeffectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel
AT bambergerhbrent theeffectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel
AT evansjennifer theeffectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel
AT gazaillerolande theeffectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel
AT groovermichaelt effectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel
AT hinkleyjacobr effectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel
AT gerowdaniele effectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel
AT bambergerhbrent effectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel
AT evansjennifer effectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel
AT gazaillerolande effectofmetalinstrumentationonpatientandsurgicalteamscatterradiationexposureusingminicarminasimulatedforearmfracturefixationmodel