Cargando…

A radiographic criteria checklist to determine reasons for errors, resulting in sub-optimal routine shoulder projections

BACKGROUND: Optimal shoulder images must adhere to specific radiographic criteria before they are sent to the radiologist for reporting. Repeat x-rays of the shoulder may increase radiation exposure to the patient. AIM: The aims of this study were to determine whether images adhered to the required...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sebelego, Ida-Keshia, van der Merwe, Belinda, du Plessis, Jeanette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6917377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934399
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v24i0.1038
_version_ 1783480401538318336
author Sebelego, Ida-Keshia
van der Merwe, Belinda
du Plessis, Jeanette
author_facet Sebelego, Ida-Keshia
van der Merwe, Belinda
du Plessis, Jeanette
author_sort Sebelego, Ida-Keshia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimal shoulder images must adhere to specific radiographic criteria before they are sent to the radiologist for reporting. Repeat x-rays of the shoulder may increase radiation exposure to the patient. AIM: The aims of this study were to determine whether images adhered to the required radiographic criteria for routine shoulder imaging and to identify possible reasons for non-adherence. SETTING: The study was conducted at an imaging department at a tertiary academic hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa. METHODS: A criteria checklist compiled from literature was used to evaluate 578 routine shoulder images including anteroposterior (AP) with external rotation and lateral-Y (LAT-Y) projections. The checklist determined whether the shoulder images adhered to the criteria with regard to the anatomy included, positioning and technical factors, such as inclusion of the correct anatomical lead marker. Data were analysed using SAS Version 9.2 statistical software. RESULTS: More than 80% of the AP external rotation images included unnecessary anatomical structures owing to incorrect centring. In four out of seven criteria pertaining to positioning for AP external rotation imaging, at least 70% of images were performed incorrectly. Four-sided collimation was not present in more than 50% of both AP external rotation and LAT-Y images because of incorrect centring, while more than 30% of shoulder images presented with anatomical digital markers. CONCLUSION: The application of criteria required for shoulder imaging must be addressed at the participating imaging department to improve overall patient care. An in-service training session is recommended to enhance the radiographic technique with regard to routine shoulder projections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6917377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69173772020-01-13 A radiographic criteria checklist to determine reasons for errors, resulting in sub-optimal routine shoulder projections Sebelego, Ida-Keshia van der Merwe, Belinda du Plessis, Jeanette Health SA Original Research BACKGROUND: Optimal shoulder images must adhere to specific radiographic criteria before they are sent to the radiologist for reporting. Repeat x-rays of the shoulder may increase radiation exposure to the patient. AIM: The aims of this study were to determine whether images adhered to the required radiographic criteria for routine shoulder imaging and to identify possible reasons for non-adherence. SETTING: The study was conducted at an imaging department at a tertiary academic hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa. METHODS: A criteria checklist compiled from literature was used to evaluate 578 routine shoulder images including anteroposterior (AP) with external rotation and lateral-Y (LAT-Y) projections. The checklist determined whether the shoulder images adhered to the criteria with regard to the anatomy included, positioning and technical factors, such as inclusion of the correct anatomical lead marker. Data were analysed using SAS Version 9.2 statistical software. RESULTS: More than 80% of the AP external rotation images included unnecessary anatomical structures owing to incorrect centring. In four out of seven criteria pertaining to positioning for AP external rotation imaging, at least 70% of images were performed incorrectly. Four-sided collimation was not present in more than 50% of both AP external rotation and LAT-Y images because of incorrect centring, while more than 30% of shoulder images presented with anatomical digital markers. CONCLUSION: The application of criteria required for shoulder imaging must be addressed at the participating imaging department to improve overall patient care. An in-service training session is recommended to enhance the radiographic technique with regard to routine shoulder projections. AOSIS 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6917377/ /pubmed/31934399 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v24i0.1038 Text en © 2019. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sebelego, Ida-Keshia
van der Merwe, Belinda
du Plessis, Jeanette
A radiographic criteria checklist to determine reasons for errors, resulting in sub-optimal routine shoulder projections
title A radiographic criteria checklist to determine reasons for errors, resulting in sub-optimal routine shoulder projections
title_full A radiographic criteria checklist to determine reasons for errors, resulting in sub-optimal routine shoulder projections
title_fullStr A radiographic criteria checklist to determine reasons for errors, resulting in sub-optimal routine shoulder projections
title_full_unstemmed A radiographic criteria checklist to determine reasons for errors, resulting in sub-optimal routine shoulder projections
title_short A radiographic criteria checklist to determine reasons for errors, resulting in sub-optimal routine shoulder projections
title_sort radiographic criteria checklist to determine reasons for errors, resulting in sub-optimal routine shoulder projections
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6917377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934399
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v24i0.1038
work_keys_str_mv AT sebelegoidakeshia aradiographiccriteriachecklisttodeterminereasonsforerrorsresultinginsuboptimalroutineshoulderprojections
AT vandermerwebelinda aradiographiccriteriachecklisttodeterminereasonsforerrorsresultinginsuboptimalroutineshoulderprojections
AT duplessisjeanette aradiographiccriteriachecklisttodeterminereasonsforerrorsresultinginsuboptimalroutineshoulderprojections
AT sebelegoidakeshia radiographiccriteriachecklisttodeterminereasonsforerrorsresultinginsuboptimalroutineshoulderprojections
AT vandermerwebelinda radiographiccriteriachecklisttodeterminereasonsforerrorsresultinginsuboptimalroutineshoulderprojections
AT duplessisjeanette radiographiccriteriachecklisttodeterminereasonsforerrorsresultinginsuboptimalroutineshoulderprojections