Cargando…
Construction and Validation of an Anticipatory Thinking Assessment
Anticipatory thinking is a critical cognitive skill for successfully navigating complex, ambiguous systems in which individuals must analyze system states, anticipate outcomes, and forecast future events. For example, in military planning, intelligence analysis, business, medicine, and social servic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6917603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02749 |
_version_ | 1783480433953996800 |
---|---|
author | Geden, Michael Smith, Andy Campbell, James Spain, Randall Amos-Binks, Adam Mott, Bradford Feng, Jing Lester, James |
author_facet | Geden, Michael Smith, Andy Campbell, James Spain, Randall Amos-Binks, Adam Mott, Bradford Feng, Jing Lester, James |
author_sort | Geden, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anticipatory thinking is a critical cognitive skill for successfully navigating complex, ambiguous systems in which individuals must analyze system states, anticipate outcomes, and forecast future events. For example, in military planning, intelligence analysis, business, medicine, and social services, individuals must use information to identify warnings, anticipate a spectrum of possible outcomes, and forecast likely futures in order to avoid tactical and strategic surprise. Existing methods for examining anticipatory thinking skill have relied upon task-specific behavioral measures or are resource-intensive, both of which are challenging to scale. Given the increasing importance of anticipatory thinking in many domains, developing a generic assessment of this skill and identifying the underlying cognitive mechanisms supporting it are paramount. The work reported here focuses on the development and validation of the anticipatory thinking assessment (ANTA) for measuring the divergent generative process of anticipatory thinking. Two-hundred and ten participants completed the ANTA, which required them to anticipate possible risks, opportunities, trends, or other uncertainties associated with a focal topic. Responses to the anticipatory thinking and divergent thinking tasks were rated by trained raters on a five-point scale according to the uniqueness, specificity, and remoteness of responses. Results supported the ANTA’s construct validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. We also explored the relationship between the ANTA scores and certain psychological traits and cognitive measures (need for cognition, need for closure, and mindfulness). Our findings suggest that the ANTA is a psychometrically valid instrument that may help researchers investigate anticipatory thinking in new contexts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6917603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69176032020-01-09 Construction and Validation of an Anticipatory Thinking Assessment Geden, Michael Smith, Andy Campbell, James Spain, Randall Amos-Binks, Adam Mott, Bradford Feng, Jing Lester, James Front Psychol Psychology Anticipatory thinking is a critical cognitive skill for successfully navigating complex, ambiguous systems in which individuals must analyze system states, anticipate outcomes, and forecast future events. For example, in military planning, intelligence analysis, business, medicine, and social services, individuals must use information to identify warnings, anticipate a spectrum of possible outcomes, and forecast likely futures in order to avoid tactical and strategic surprise. Existing methods for examining anticipatory thinking skill have relied upon task-specific behavioral measures or are resource-intensive, both of which are challenging to scale. Given the increasing importance of anticipatory thinking in many domains, developing a generic assessment of this skill and identifying the underlying cognitive mechanisms supporting it are paramount. The work reported here focuses on the development and validation of the anticipatory thinking assessment (ANTA) for measuring the divergent generative process of anticipatory thinking. Two-hundred and ten participants completed the ANTA, which required them to anticipate possible risks, opportunities, trends, or other uncertainties associated with a focal topic. Responses to the anticipatory thinking and divergent thinking tasks were rated by trained raters on a five-point scale according to the uniqueness, specificity, and remoteness of responses. Results supported the ANTA’s construct validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. We also explored the relationship between the ANTA scores and certain psychological traits and cognitive measures (need for cognition, need for closure, and mindfulness). Our findings suggest that the ANTA is a psychometrically valid instrument that may help researchers investigate anticipatory thinking in new contexts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6917603/ /pubmed/31920806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02749 Text en Copyright © 2019 Geden, Smith, Campbell, Spain, Amos-Binks, Mott, Feng and Lester. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Geden, Michael Smith, Andy Campbell, James Spain, Randall Amos-Binks, Adam Mott, Bradford Feng, Jing Lester, James Construction and Validation of an Anticipatory Thinking Assessment |
title | Construction and Validation of an Anticipatory Thinking Assessment |
title_full | Construction and Validation of an Anticipatory Thinking Assessment |
title_fullStr | Construction and Validation of an Anticipatory Thinking Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Construction and Validation of an Anticipatory Thinking Assessment |
title_short | Construction and Validation of an Anticipatory Thinking Assessment |
title_sort | construction and validation of an anticipatory thinking assessment |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6917603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02749 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gedenmichael constructionandvalidationofananticipatorythinkingassessment AT smithandy constructionandvalidationofananticipatorythinkingassessment AT campbelljames constructionandvalidationofananticipatorythinkingassessment AT spainrandall constructionandvalidationofananticipatorythinkingassessment AT amosbinksadam constructionandvalidationofananticipatorythinkingassessment AT mottbradford constructionandvalidationofananticipatorythinkingassessment AT fengjing constructionandvalidationofananticipatorythinkingassessment AT lesterjames constructionandvalidationofananticipatorythinkingassessment |