Cargando…
Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study
AIMS: This study aimed to psychometrically test the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” and to broaden the understanding of the instrument's psychometrics and applicability. DESIGN: Embedded mixed‐methods design. METHODS: We performed a cross‐sectional study assessing all stationary patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6917930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31871705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383 |
_version_ | 1783480486505480192 |
---|---|
author | Huber, Evelyn Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Michael Kugler, Christiane Müller, Marianne Spirig, Rebecca |
author_facet | Huber, Evelyn Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Michael Kugler, Christiane Müller, Marianne Spirig, Rebecca |
author_sort | Huber, Evelyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: This study aimed to psychometrically test the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” and to broaden the understanding of the instrument's psychometrics and applicability. DESIGN: Embedded mixed‐methods design. METHODS: We performed a cross‐sectional study assessing all stationary patients of five Swiss hospitals daily for up to 5 days with the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” over a 1–month period in 2015. The scale's psychometrics were analysed using partial least square structural equation modelling. In the qualitative study section, we completed 12 case studies and analysed them case‐wise and across cases. Quantitative and qualitative results were synthesized in tables. RESULTS: Structural equation modelling confirmed a reflective‐formative second‐order model of the instrument with good psychometric properties leading to a formula for the calculation of a complexity score. Qualitative results evolved descriptions of low and high extent of complexity. Narrative considerations of two raters deepened the understanding of the inter‐rater reliability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6917930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69179302019-12-23 Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study Huber, Evelyn Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Michael Kugler, Christiane Müller, Marianne Spirig, Rebecca Nurs Open Research Articles AIMS: This study aimed to psychometrically test the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” and to broaden the understanding of the instrument's psychometrics and applicability. DESIGN: Embedded mixed‐methods design. METHODS: We performed a cross‐sectional study assessing all stationary patients of five Swiss hospitals daily for up to 5 days with the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” over a 1–month period in 2015. The scale's psychometrics were analysed using partial least square structural equation modelling. In the qualitative study section, we completed 12 case studies and analysed them case‐wise and across cases. Quantitative and qualitative results were synthesized in tables. RESULTS: Structural equation modelling confirmed a reflective‐formative second‐order model of the instrument with good psychometric properties leading to a formula for the calculation of a complexity score. Qualitative results evolved descriptions of low and high extent of complexity. Narrative considerations of two raters deepened the understanding of the inter‐rater reliability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6917930/ /pubmed/31871705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Huber, Evelyn Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Michael Kugler, Christiane Müller, Marianne Spirig, Rebecca Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study |
title | Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study |
title_full | Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study |
title_fullStr | Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study |
title_short | Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study |
title_sort | validation of the instrument “complexity of nursing care”—a mixed‐methods study |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6917930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31871705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huberevelyn validationoftheinstrumentcomplexityofnursingcareamixedmethodsstudy AT kleinknechtdolfmichael validationoftheinstrumentcomplexityofnursingcareamixedmethodsstudy AT kuglerchristiane validationoftheinstrumentcomplexityofnursingcareamixedmethodsstudy AT mullermarianne validationoftheinstrumentcomplexityofnursingcareamixedmethodsstudy AT spirigrebecca validationoftheinstrumentcomplexityofnursingcareamixedmethodsstudy |