Cargando…

Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study

AIMS: This study aimed to psychometrically test the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” and to broaden the understanding of the instrument's psychometrics and applicability. DESIGN: Embedded mixed‐methods design. METHODS: We performed a cross‐sectional study assessing all stationary patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huber, Evelyn, Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Michael, Kugler, Christiane, Müller, Marianne, Spirig, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6917930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31871705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383
_version_ 1783480486505480192
author Huber, Evelyn
Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Michael
Kugler, Christiane
Müller, Marianne
Spirig, Rebecca
author_facet Huber, Evelyn
Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Michael
Kugler, Christiane
Müller, Marianne
Spirig, Rebecca
author_sort Huber, Evelyn
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study aimed to psychometrically test the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” and to broaden the understanding of the instrument's psychometrics and applicability. DESIGN: Embedded mixed‐methods design. METHODS: We performed a cross‐sectional study assessing all stationary patients of five Swiss hospitals daily for up to 5 days with the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” over a 1–month period in 2015. The scale's psychometrics were analysed using partial least square structural equation modelling. In the qualitative study section, we completed 12 case studies and analysed them case‐wise and across cases. Quantitative and qualitative results were synthesized in tables. RESULTS: Structural equation modelling confirmed a reflective‐formative second‐order model of the instrument with good psychometric properties leading to a formula for the calculation of a complexity score. Qualitative results evolved descriptions of low and high extent of complexity. Narrative considerations of two raters deepened the understanding of the inter‐rater reliability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6917930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69179302019-12-23 Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study Huber, Evelyn Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Michael Kugler, Christiane Müller, Marianne Spirig, Rebecca Nurs Open Research Articles AIMS: This study aimed to psychometrically test the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” and to broaden the understanding of the instrument's psychometrics and applicability. DESIGN: Embedded mixed‐methods design. METHODS: We performed a cross‐sectional study assessing all stationary patients of five Swiss hospitals daily for up to 5 days with the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care” over a 1–month period in 2015. The scale's psychometrics were analysed using partial least square structural equation modelling. In the qualitative study section, we completed 12 case studies and analysed them case‐wise and across cases. Quantitative and qualitative results were synthesized in tables. RESULTS: Structural equation modelling confirmed a reflective‐formative second‐order model of the instrument with good psychometric properties leading to a formula for the calculation of a complexity score. Qualitative results evolved descriptions of low and high extent of complexity. Narrative considerations of two raters deepened the understanding of the inter‐rater reliability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6917930/ /pubmed/31871705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Huber, Evelyn
Kleinknecht‐Dolf, Michael
Kugler, Christiane
Müller, Marianne
Spirig, Rebecca
Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study
title Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study
title_full Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study
title_fullStr Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study
title_short Validation of the instrument “Complexity of Nursing Care”—A mixed‐methods study
title_sort validation of the instrument “complexity of nursing care”—a mixed‐methods study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6917930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31871705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.383
work_keys_str_mv AT huberevelyn validationoftheinstrumentcomplexityofnursingcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT kleinknechtdolfmichael validationoftheinstrumentcomplexityofnursingcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT kuglerchristiane validationoftheinstrumentcomplexityofnursingcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT mullermarianne validationoftheinstrumentcomplexityofnursingcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT spirigrebecca validationoftheinstrumentcomplexityofnursingcareamixedmethodsstudy