Cargando…

Expectation affects neural repetition suppression in infancy

Recent work provides evidence that the infant brain is able to make top-down predictions, but this has been explored only in limited contexts and domains. We build upon this evidence of predictive processing in infants using a new paradigm to examine auditory repetition suppression (RS). RS is a wel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emberson, Lauren L., Boldin, Alex M., Robertson, Claire E., Cannon, Grace, Aslin, Richard N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.11.001
_version_ 1783480600210964480
author Emberson, Lauren L.
Boldin, Alex M.
Robertson, Claire E.
Cannon, Grace
Aslin, Richard N.
author_facet Emberson, Lauren L.
Boldin, Alex M.
Robertson, Claire E.
Cannon, Grace
Aslin, Richard N.
author_sort Emberson, Lauren L.
collection PubMed
description Recent work provides evidence that the infant brain is able to make top-down predictions, but this has been explored only in limited contexts and domains. We build upon this evidence of predictive processing in infants using a new paradigm to examine auditory repetition suppression (RS). RS is a well-documented neural phenomenon in which repeated presentations of the same stimulus result in reduced neural activation compared to non-repeating stimuli. Many theories explain RS using bottom-up mechanisms, but recent work has posited that top-down expectation and predictive coding may bias, or even explain, RS. Here, we investigate whether RS in the infant brain is similarly sensitive to top-down mechanisms. We use fNIRS to measure infants’ neural response in two experimental conditions, one in which variability in stimulus presentation is expected (occurs 75% of the time) and a control condition where variability and repetition are equally likely (50% of the time). We show that 6-month-old infants exhibit attenuated frontal lobe response to blocks of variable auditory stimuli during contexts when variability is expected as compared to the control condition. These findings suggest that young infants’ neural responses are modulated by predictions gained from experience and not simply by bottom-up mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6918478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69184782019-12-18 Expectation affects neural repetition suppression in infancy Emberson, Lauren L. Boldin, Alex M. Robertson, Claire E. Cannon, Grace Aslin, Richard N. Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research Recent work provides evidence that the infant brain is able to make top-down predictions, but this has been explored only in limited contexts and domains. We build upon this evidence of predictive processing in infants using a new paradigm to examine auditory repetition suppression (RS). RS is a well-documented neural phenomenon in which repeated presentations of the same stimulus result in reduced neural activation compared to non-repeating stimuli. Many theories explain RS using bottom-up mechanisms, but recent work has posited that top-down expectation and predictive coding may bias, or even explain, RS. Here, we investigate whether RS in the infant brain is similarly sensitive to top-down mechanisms. We use fNIRS to measure infants’ neural response in two experimental conditions, one in which variability in stimulus presentation is expected (occurs 75% of the time) and a control condition where variability and repetition are equally likely (50% of the time). We show that 6-month-old infants exhibit attenuated frontal lobe response to blocks of variable auditory stimuli during contexts when variability is expected as compared to the control condition. These findings suggest that young infants’ neural responses are modulated by predictions gained from experience and not simply by bottom-up mechanisms. Elsevier 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6918478/ /pubmed/30473471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.11.001 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Emberson, Lauren L.
Boldin, Alex M.
Robertson, Claire E.
Cannon, Grace
Aslin, Richard N.
Expectation affects neural repetition suppression in infancy
title Expectation affects neural repetition suppression in infancy
title_full Expectation affects neural repetition suppression in infancy
title_fullStr Expectation affects neural repetition suppression in infancy
title_full_unstemmed Expectation affects neural repetition suppression in infancy
title_short Expectation affects neural repetition suppression in infancy
title_sort expectation affects neural repetition suppression in infancy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT embersonlaurenl expectationaffectsneuralrepetitionsuppressionininfancy
AT boldinalexm expectationaffectsneuralrepetitionsuppressionininfancy
AT robertsonclairee expectationaffectsneuralrepetitionsuppressionininfancy
AT cannongrace expectationaffectsneuralrepetitionsuppressionininfancy
AT aslinrichardn expectationaffectsneuralrepetitionsuppressionininfancy