Cargando…

Circular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countries

BACKGROUND: The circular economy framework for human production and consumption is an alternative to the traditional, linear concept of ‘take, make, and dispose’. Circular economy (CE) principles comprise of ‘design out waste and pollution’, ‘retain products and materials in use’, and ‘regenerate na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wright, Caradee Y., Godfrey, Linda, Armiento, Giovanna, Haywood, Lorren K., Inglesi-Lotz, Roula, Lyne, Katrina, Schwerdtle, Patricia Nayna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0501-y
_version_ 1783480633316605952
author Wright, Caradee Y.
Godfrey, Linda
Armiento, Giovanna
Haywood, Lorren K.
Inglesi-Lotz, Roula
Lyne, Katrina
Schwerdtle, Patricia Nayna
author_facet Wright, Caradee Y.
Godfrey, Linda
Armiento, Giovanna
Haywood, Lorren K.
Inglesi-Lotz, Roula
Lyne, Katrina
Schwerdtle, Patricia Nayna
author_sort Wright, Caradee Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The circular economy framework for human production and consumption is an alternative to the traditional, linear concept of ‘take, make, and dispose’. Circular economy (CE) principles comprise of ‘design out waste and pollution’, ‘retain products and materials in use’, and ‘regenerate natural systems’. This commentary considers the risks and opportunities of the CE for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), acknowledging that LMICs must identify their own opportunities, while recognising the potential positive and negative environmental health impacts. MAIN BODY: The implementation of the CE in LMICs is mostly undertaken informally, driven by poverty and unemployment. Activities being employed towards extracting value from waste in LMICs are imposing environmental health risks including exposure to hazardous and toxic working environments, emissions and materials, and infectious diseases. The CE has the potential to aid towards the achievement of the SDGs, in particular SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities). However, since SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being) is critical in the pursuit of all SDGs, the negative implications of the CE should be well understood and addressed. We call on policy makers, industry, the health sector, and health-determining sectors to address these issues by defining mechanisms to protect vulnerable populations from the negative health impacts that may arise in LMICs as these countries domesticate the CE. CONCLUSION: Striving towards a better understanding of risks should not undermine support for the CE, which requires the full agency of the public and policy communities to realise the potential to accelerate LMICs towards sustainable production and consumption, with positive synergies for several SDGs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6918643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69186432019-12-20 Circular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countries Wright, Caradee Y. Godfrey, Linda Armiento, Giovanna Haywood, Lorren K. Inglesi-Lotz, Roula Lyne, Katrina Schwerdtle, Patricia Nayna Global Health Commentary BACKGROUND: The circular economy framework for human production and consumption is an alternative to the traditional, linear concept of ‘take, make, and dispose’. Circular economy (CE) principles comprise of ‘design out waste and pollution’, ‘retain products and materials in use’, and ‘regenerate natural systems’. This commentary considers the risks and opportunities of the CE for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), acknowledging that LMICs must identify their own opportunities, while recognising the potential positive and negative environmental health impacts. MAIN BODY: The implementation of the CE in LMICs is mostly undertaken informally, driven by poverty and unemployment. Activities being employed towards extracting value from waste in LMICs are imposing environmental health risks including exposure to hazardous and toxic working environments, emissions and materials, and infectious diseases. The CE has the potential to aid towards the achievement of the SDGs, in particular SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities). However, since SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being) is critical in the pursuit of all SDGs, the negative implications of the CE should be well understood and addressed. We call on policy makers, industry, the health sector, and health-determining sectors to address these issues by defining mechanisms to protect vulnerable populations from the negative health impacts that may arise in LMICs as these countries domesticate the CE. CONCLUSION: Striving towards a better understanding of risks should not undermine support for the CE, which requires the full agency of the public and policy communities to realise the potential to accelerate LMICs towards sustainable production and consumption, with positive synergies for several SDGs. BioMed Central 2019-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6918643/ /pubmed/31847867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0501-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Wright, Caradee Y.
Godfrey, Linda
Armiento, Giovanna
Haywood, Lorren K.
Inglesi-Lotz, Roula
Lyne, Katrina
Schwerdtle, Patricia Nayna
Circular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countries
title Circular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countries
title_full Circular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countries
title_fullStr Circular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countries
title_full_unstemmed Circular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countries
title_short Circular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countries
title_sort circular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countries
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0501-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightcaradeey circulareconomyandenvironmentalhealthinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT godfreylinda circulareconomyandenvironmentalhealthinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT armientogiovanna circulareconomyandenvironmentalhealthinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT haywoodlorrenk circulareconomyandenvironmentalhealthinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT inglesilotzroula circulareconomyandenvironmentalhealthinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT lynekatrina circulareconomyandenvironmentalhealthinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT schwerdtlepatricianayna circulareconomyandenvironmentalhealthinlowandmiddleincomecountries