Cargando…

An optimized BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing for different clinical sample types

OBJECTIVE: A simultaneous detection of germline and somatic mutations in ovarian cancer (OC) using tumor materials is considered to be cost-effective for BRCA1/2 testing. However, there are limited studies of the analytical performances according to various sample types. The aim of this study is to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Yoonjung, Cho, Chi-Heum, Ha, Jung-Sook, Kim, Do-Hoon, Kwon, Sun Young, Oh, Seoung Chul, Lee, Kyung-A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e9
_version_ 1783480673482309632
author Kim, Yoonjung
Cho, Chi-Heum
Ha, Jung-Sook
Kim, Do-Hoon
Kwon, Sun Young
Oh, Seoung Chul
Lee, Kyung-A
author_facet Kim, Yoonjung
Cho, Chi-Heum
Ha, Jung-Sook
Kim, Do-Hoon
Kwon, Sun Young
Oh, Seoung Chul
Lee, Kyung-A
author_sort Kim, Yoonjung
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A simultaneous detection of germline and somatic mutations in ovarian cancer (OC) using tumor materials is considered to be cost-effective for BRCA1/2 testing. However, there are limited studies of the analytical performances according to various sample types. The aim of this study is to propose a strategy for routine BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing (NGS) screening based on analytical performance according to different sample types. METHODS: We compared BRCA1/2 NGS screening assay using buffy coat, fresh-frozen (FF) and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) from 130 samples. RESULTS: The rate of repeated tests in a total of buffy coat, FF and FFPE was 0%, 8%, and 34%, respectively. The accuracy of BRCA1/2 NGS testing was 100.0%, 99.9% and 99.9% in buffy coat, FFPE and FF, respectively. However, due to the presence of variant allele frequency (VAF) shifted heterozygous variants, tumor materials (FFPE and FF) showed lower sensitivity (95.5%–99.0%) than buffy coat (100%). Furthermore, FFPE showed 51.4% of the positive predictive value (PPV) on account of sequence artifacts. When performed in the post-filtration process, PPV was increased by approximately 20% in FFPE. Buffy coat showed 100% of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in BRCA1/2 NGS test. CONCLUSIONS: On the comparison of the analytical performance according to different sample types, the buffy coat was not affected by sequencing artifacts and VAF shifted variants. Therefore, the blood test should be given priority in detecting germline BRCA1/2 mutation, and tumor materials could be suitable to detect somatic mutations in OC patients without identifying germline BRCA1/2 mutation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6918881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69188812020-01-01 An optimized BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing for different clinical sample types Kim, Yoonjung Cho, Chi-Heum Ha, Jung-Sook Kim, Do-Hoon Kwon, Sun Young Oh, Seoung Chul Lee, Kyung-A J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: A simultaneous detection of germline and somatic mutations in ovarian cancer (OC) using tumor materials is considered to be cost-effective for BRCA1/2 testing. However, there are limited studies of the analytical performances according to various sample types. The aim of this study is to propose a strategy for routine BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing (NGS) screening based on analytical performance according to different sample types. METHODS: We compared BRCA1/2 NGS screening assay using buffy coat, fresh-frozen (FF) and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) from 130 samples. RESULTS: The rate of repeated tests in a total of buffy coat, FF and FFPE was 0%, 8%, and 34%, respectively. The accuracy of BRCA1/2 NGS testing was 100.0%, 99.9% and 99.9% in buffy coat, FFPE and FF, respectively. However, due to the presence of variant allele frequency (VAF) shifted heterozygous variants, tumor materials (FFPE and FF) showed lower sensitivity (95.5%–99.0%) than buffy coat (100%). Furthermore, FFPE showed 51.4% of the positive predictive value (PPV) on account of sequence artifacts. When performed in the post-filtration process, PPV was increased by approximately 20% in FFPE. Buffy coat showed 100% of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in BRCA1/2 NGS test. CONCLUSIONS: On the comparison of the analytical performance according to different sample types, the buffy coat was not affected by sequencing artifacts and VAF shifted variants. Therefore, the blood test should be given priority in detecting germline BRCA1/2 mutation, and tumor materials could be suitable to detect somatic mutations in OC patients without identifying germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6918881/ /pubmed/31788999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e9 Text en Copyright © 2020. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Yoonjung
Cho, Chi-Heum
Ha, Jung-Sook
Kim, Do-Hoon
Kwon, Sun Young
Oh, Seoung Chul
Lee, Kyung-A
An optimized BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing for different clinical sample types
title An optimized BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing for different clinical sample types
title_full An optimized BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing for different clinical sample types
title_fullStr An optimized BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing for different clinical sample types
title_full_unstemmed An optimized BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing for different clinical sample types
title_short An optimized BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing for different clinical sample types
title_sort optimized brca1/2 next-generation sequencing for different clinical sample types
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e9
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyoonjung anoptimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT chochiheum anoptimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT hajungsook anoptimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT kimdohoon anoptimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT kwonsunyoung anoptimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT ohseoungchul anoptimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT leekyunga anoptimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT kimyoonjung optimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT chochiheum optimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT hajungsook optimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT kimdohoon optimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT kwonsunyoung optimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT ohseoungchul optimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes
AT leekyunga optimizedbrca12nextgenerationsequencingfordifferentclinicalsampletypes