Cargando…

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) in women with 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC cervical cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective dual-institutional study, a total of 185 node-positive cervical cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aslan, Koray, Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu, Oz, Murat, Tohma, Yusuf Aytac, Haberal, Ali, Ayhan, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788991
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e1
_version_ 1783480676008329216
author Aslan, Koray
Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu
Oz, Murat
Tohma, Yusuf Aytac
Haberal, Ali
Ayhan, Ali
author_facet Aslan, Koray
Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu
Oz, Murat
Tohma, Yusuf Aytac
Haberal, Ali
Ayhan, Ali
author_sort Aslan, Koray
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) in women with 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC cervical cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective dual-institutional study, a total of 185 node-positive cervical cancer patients who had undergone radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy were included. All of the patients received adjuvant chemoradiation after surgery. LNR was defined as the ratio of positive lymph nodes (LNs) to the total number of LNs removed. The patients were categorized into 2 groups according to LNR; LNR <0.05 and LNR ≥0.05. The prognostic value of LNR was evaluated with univariate log-rank tests and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients (74.6%) had stage IIIC1 disease and 47 (25.4%) patients had stage IIIC2 disease. With a median follow-up period of 45.5 months (range 3–135 months), the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 62.5% whereas the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 70.4% for the entire study population. The 5-year DFS rates for LNR <0.05 and LNR ≥0.05 were 78.2%, and 48.4%, respectively (p<0.001). Additionally, the 5-year OS rates for LNR <0.05 and LNR ≥0.05 were 80.6%, and 61.2%, respectively (p=0.007). On multivariate analysis, LNR ≥0.05 was associated with a worse DFS (hazard ratio [HR]=2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.15–3.90; p=0.015) and OS (HR=1.95; 95% CI=1.01–3.77; p=0.046) in women with stage IIIC cervical cancer. CONCLUSIONS: LNR ≥0.05 seems to be an independent prognostic factor for decreased DFS and OS in stage IIIC cervical carcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6918892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69188922020-01-01 The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy Aslan, Koray Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu Oz, Murat Tohma, Yusuf Aytac Haberal, Ali Ayhan, Ali J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) in women with 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC cervical cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective dual-institutional study, a total of 185 node-positive cervical cancer patients who had undergone radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy were included. All of the patients received adjuvant chemoradiation after surgery. LNR was defined as the ratio of positive lymph nodes (LNs) to the total number of LNs removed. The patients were categorized into 2 groups according to LNR; LNR <0.05 and LNR ≥0.05. The prognostic value of LNR was evaluated with univariate log-rank tests and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients (74.6%) had stage IIIC1 disease and 47 (25.4%) patients had stage IIIC2 disease. With a median follow-up period of 45.5 months (range 3–135 months), the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 62.5% whereas the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 70.4% for the entire study population. The 5-year DFS rates for LNR <0.05 and LNR ≥0.05 were 78.2%, and 48.4%, respectively (p<0.001). Additionally, the 5-year OS rates for LNR <0.05 and LNR ≥0.05 were 80.6%, and 61.2%, respectively (p=0.007). On multivariate analysis, LNR ≥0.05 was associated with a worse DFS (hazard ratio [HR]=2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.15–3.90; p=0.015) and OS (HR=1.95; 95% CI=1.01–3.77; p=0.046) in women with stage IIIC cervical cancer. CONCLUSIONS: LNR ≥0.05 seems to be an independent prognostic factor for decreased DFS and OS in stage IIIC cervical carcinoma. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2019-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6918892/ /pubmed/31788991 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e1 Text en Copyright © 2020. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aslan, Koray
Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu
Oz, Murat
Tohma, Yusuf Aytac
Haberal, Ali
Ayhan, Ali
The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
title The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
title_full The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
title_fullStr The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
title_short The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
title_sort prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage iiic cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6918892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788991
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e1
work_keys_str_mv AT aslankoray theprognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy
AT meydanlimehmetmutlu theprognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy
AT ozmurat theprognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy
AT tohmayusufaytac theprognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy
AT haberalali theprognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy
AT ayhanali theprognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy
AT aslankoray prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy
AT meydanlimehmetmutlu prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy
AT ozmurat prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy
AT tohmayusufaytac prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy
AT haberalali prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy
AT ayhanali prognosticvalueoflymphnoderatioinstageiiiccervicalcancerpatientstriagedtoprimarytreatmentbyradicalhysterectomywithsystematicpelvicandparaaorticlymphadenectomy