Cargando…
Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice
Introduction: Greater distance to abortion facilities is associated with greater out-of-pocket costs, emergency room follow-up care, negative mental health, and delayed care among U.S. abortion patients. However, the distance U.S. abortion patients travel has not been reported since 2008, and no stu...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6919239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31282804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7496 |
_version_ | 1783480733749215232 |
---|---|
author | Fuentes, Liza Jerman, Jenna |
author_facet | Fuentes, Liza Jerman, Jenna |
author_sort | Fuentes, Liza |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Greater distance to abortion facilities is associated with greater out-of-pocket costs, emergency room follow-up care, negative mental health, and delayed care among U.S. abortion patients. However, the distance U.S. abortion patients travel has not been reported since 2008, and no study has examined reasons abortion patients choose the particular facility where they obtain their abortion. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from the 2014 Abortion Patient Survey and Abortion Provider Census to report abortion patients' one-way travel from their resident zip code to their abortion clinic, whether they went to the closest clinic, and reasons for facility choice. We report unadjusted and adjusted associations of patients' characteristics with travel distance and differences in average travel distance by abortion patients' reported reasons for choosing their facility. Results: In 2014, 65% of abortion patients traveled less than 25 miles one-way, 17% traveled 25–49 miles, and 18% traveled more than 50 miles. Abortion patients who were white, college-educated, U.S.-born, ≥12 weeks pregnant, and lived outside metropolitan areas were more likely to travel farther. Nearly half of abortion patients went to their nearest provider and 32% chose their facility because it was the closest. Conclusion: These results indicate that travel distance is an important determinant of abortion care access in the United States. Nearly, one-fifth of U.S. abortion patients traveled more than 50 miles one-way and the most common reason reported for clinic choice was that it was the closest. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6919239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69192392019-12-23 Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice Fuentes, Liza Jerman, Jenna J Womens Health (Larchmt) Original Articles Introduction: Greater distance to abortion facilities is associated with greater out-of-pocket costs, emergency room follow-up care, negative mental health, and delayed care among U.S. abortion patients. However, the distance U.S. abortion patients travel has not been reported since 2008, and no study has examined reasons abortion patients choose the particular facility where they obtain their abortion. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from the 2014 Abortion Patient Survey and Abortion Provider Census to report abortion patients' one-way travel from their resident zip code to their abortion clinic, whether they went to the closest clinic, and reasons for facility choice. We report unadjusted and adjusted associations of patients' characteristics with travel distance and differences in average travel distance by abortion patients' reported reasons for choosing their facility. Results: In 2014, 65% of abortion patients traveled less than 25 miles one-way, 17% traveled 25–49 miles, and 18% traveled more than 50 miles. Abortion patients who were white, college-educated, U.S.-born, ≥12 weeks pregnant, and lived outside metropolitan areas were more likely to travel farther. Nearly half of abortion patients went to their nearest provider and 32% chose their facility because it was the closest. Conclusion: These results indicate that travel distance is an important determinant of abortion care access in the United States. Nearly, one-fifth of U.S. abortion patients traveled more than 50 miles one-way and the most common reason reported for clinic choice was that it was the closest. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019-12-01 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6919239/ /pubmed/31282804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7496 Text en © Liza Fuentes and Jenna Jerman 2019; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Fuentes, Liza Jerman, Jenna Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice |
title | Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice |
title_full | Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice |
title_fullStr | Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice |
title_full_unstemmed | Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice |
title_short | Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice |
title_sort | distance traveled to obtain clinical abortion care in the united states and reasons for clinic choice |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6919239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31282804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuentesliza distancetraveledtoobtainclinicalabortioncareintheunitedstatesandreasonsforclinicchoice AT jermanjenna distancetraveledtoobtainclinicalabortioncareintheunitedstatesandreasonsforclinicchoice |