Cargando…
Slow and steady? Strategic adjustments in response caution are moderately reliable and correlate across tasks
Speed-accuracy trade-offs are often considered a confound in speeded choice tasks, but individual differences in strategy have been linked to personality and brain structure. We ask whether strategic adjustments in response caution are reliable, and whether they correlate across tasks and with impul...
Autores principales: | Hedge, Craig, Vivian-Griffiths, Solveiga, Powell, Georgina, Bompas, Aline, Sumner, Petroc |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31421398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102797 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Self-reported impulsivity does not predict response caution()
por: Hedge, Craig, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Low and Variable Correlation Between Reaction Time Costs and Accuracy Costs Explained by Accumulation Models: Meta-Analysis and Simulations
por: Hedge, Craig, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Strategy and Processing Speed Eclipse Individual Differences in Control Ability in Conflict Tasks
por: Hedge, Craig, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences
por: Hedge, Craig, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles
por: Bompas, Aline, et al.
Publicado: (2017)