Cargando…

Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts

Abstract. To evaluate the importance of morphological and chemical characters used in the recognition of species within the Parmelia omphalodes group, we performed phylogenetic, morphological and chemical analyses of 335 specimens, of which 34 were used for molecular analyses. Phylogenetic analyses,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ossowska, Emilia, Guzow-Krzemińska, Beata, Kolanowska, Marta, Szczepańska, Katarzyna, Kukwa, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866741
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175
_version_ 1783480903991820288
author Ossowska, Emilia
Guzow-Krzemińska, Beata
Kolanowska, Marta
Szczepańska, Katarzyna
Kukwa, Martin
author_facet Ossowska, Emilia
Guzow-Krzemińska, Beata
Kolanowska, Marta
Szczepańska, Katarzyna
Kukwa, Martin
author_sort Ossowska, Emilia
collection PubMed
description Abstract. To evaluate the importance of morphological and chemical characters used in the recognition of species within the Parmelia omphalodes group, we performed phylogenetic, morphological and chemical analyses of 335 specimens, of which 34 were used for molecular analyses. Phylogenetic analyses, based on ITS rDNA sequences, show that P. pinnatifida is distinct from P. omphalodes and the most important difference between those species is the development of pseudocyphellae. In P. pinnatifida, they are mostly marginal and form white rims along lobes margins, but laminal pseudocyphellae can develop in older parts of thalli and are predominantly connected with marginal pseudocyphellae. In contrast, in P. omphalodes laminal pseudocyphellae are common and are predominantly not connected to marginal pseudocyphellae. Chemical composition of secondary lichen metabolites in both analysed species is identical and therefore this feature is not diagnostic in species recognition. Few samples of P. discordans, species morphologically similar to P. omphalodes and P. pinnatifida, were also included in the analyses and they are nested within the clade of P. omphalodes, despite the different chemistry (protocetraric acid present versus salazinic acid in P. omphalodes). All taxa of the P. omphalodes group occupy similar niches, but their potential distributions are wider than those currently known. The absence of specimens in some localities may be limited by the photobiont availability. Parmelia omphalodes and P. pinnatifida are moderately selective in photobiont choice as they form associations with at least two or three lineages of Trebouxia clade S. Parmelia pinnatifida, as well as P. discordans are associated with Trebouxia OTU S02 which seems to have a broad ecological amplitude. Other lineages of Trebouxia seem to be rarer, especially Trebouxia sp. OTU S04, which is sometimes present in P. pinnatifida. This study indicates the importance of extensive research including morphology, chemistry and analysis of molecular markers of both bionts in taxonomical studies of lichens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6920222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69202222019-12-20 Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts Ossowska, Emilia Guzow-Krzemińska, Beata Kolanowska, Marta Szczepańska, Katarzyna Kukwa, Martin MycoKeys Research Article Abstract. To evaluate the importance of morphological and chemical characters used in the recognition of species within the Parmelia omphalodes group, we performed phylogenetic, morphological and chemical analyses of 335 specimens, of which 34 were used for molecular analyses. Phylogenetic analyses, based on ITS rDNA sequences, show that P. pinnatifida is distinct from P. omphalodes and the most important difference between those species is the development of pseudocyphellae. In P. pinnatifida, they are mostly marginal and form white rims along lobes margins, but laminal pseudocyphellae can develop in older parts of thalli and are predominantly connected with marginal pseudocyphellae. In contrast, in P. omphalodes laminal pseudocyphellae are common and are predominantly not connected to marginal pseudocyphellae. Chemical composition of secondary lichen metabolites in both analysed species is identical and therefore this feature is not diagnostic in species recognition. Few samples of P. discordans, species morphologically similar to P. omphalodes and P. pinnatifida, were also included in the analyses and they are nested within the clade of P. omphalodes, despite the different chemistry (protocetraric acid present versus salazinic acid in P. omphalodes). All taxa of the P. omphalodes group occupy similar niches, but their potential distributions are wider than those currently known. The absence of specimens in some localities may be limited by the photobiont availability. Parmelia omphalodes and P. pinnatifida are moderately selective in photobiont choice as they form associations with at least two or three lineages of Trebouxia clade S. Parmelia pinnatifida, as well as P. discordans are associated with Trebouxia OTU S02 which seems to have a broad ecological amplitude. Other lineages of Trebouxia seem to be rarer, especially Trebouxia sp. OTU S04, which is sometimes present in P. pinnatifida. This study indicates the importance of extensive research including morphology, chemistry and analysis of molecular markers of both bionts in taxonomical studies of lichens. Pensoft Publishers 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6920222/ /pubmed/31866741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175 Text en Emilia Ossowska, Beata Guzow-Krzemińska, Marta Kolanowska, Katarzyna Szczepańska, Martin Kukwa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ossowska, Emilia
Guzow-Krzemińska, Beata
Kolanowska, Marta
Szczepańska, Katarzyna
Kukwa, Martin
Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts
title Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts
title_full Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts
title_fullStr Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts
title_full_unstemmed Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts
title_short Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts
title_sort morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of parmelia omphalodes group – evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866741
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175
work_keys_str_mv AT ossowskaemilia morphologyandsecondarychemistryinspeciesrecognitionofparmeliaomphalodesgroupevidencefrommoleculardatawithnotesontheecologicalnichemodellingandgeneticvariabilityofphotobionts
AT guzowkrzeminskabeata morphologyandsecondarychemistryinspeciesrecognitionofparmeliaomphalodesgroupevidencefrommoleculardatawithnotesontheecologicalnichemodellingandgeneticvariabilityofphotobionts
AT kolanowskamarta morphologyandsecondarychemistryinspeciesrecognitionofparmeliaomphalodesgroupevidencefrommoleculardatawithnotesontheecologicalnichemodellingandgeneticvariabilityofphotobionts
AT szczepanskakatarzyna morphologyandsecondarychemistryinspeciesrecognitionofparmeliaomphalodesgroupevidencefrommoleculardatawithnotesontheecologicalnichemodellingandgeneticvariabilityofphotobionts
AT kukwamartin morphologyandsecondarychemistryinspeciesrecognitionofparmeliaomphalodesgroupevidencefrommoleculardatawithnotesontheecologicalnichemodellingandgeneticvariabilityofphotobionts