Cargando…
Tissue classification by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS): comparison between a diathermic knife and CO(2) laser sampling on classification performance
The increasing need for rapid, in situ, and robust tissue profiling approaches in the context of intraoperative diagnostics has led to the development of a large number of ambient ionization-based surface sampling strategies. This paper compares the performances of a diathermic knife and a CO(2) las...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31713015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-02148-8 |
_version_ | 1783480907638767616 |
---|---|
author | Genangeli, Michele Heeren, Ron M. A. Porta Siegel, Tiffany |
author_facet | Genangeli, Michele Heeren, Ron M. A. Porta Siegel, Tiffany |
author_sort | Genangeli, Michele |
collection | PubMed |
description | The increasing need for rapid, in situ, and robust tissue profiling approaches in the context of intraoperative diagnostics has led to the development of a large number of ambient ionization-based surface sampling strategies. This paper compares the performances of a diathermic knife and a CO(2) laser handpiece, both clinically approved, coupled to a rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) source for quasi-instantaneous tissue classification. Several fresh meat samples (muscle, liver, bone, bone marrow, cartilage, skin, fat) were obtained from different animals. Overall, the laser produced cleaner cuts and more reproducible and higher spectral quality signals when compared with the diathermic knife (CV laser = 9–12%, CV diathermic = 14–23%). The molecular profiles were subsequently entered into a database and PCA/LDA classification/prediction models were built to assess if the data generated with one sampling modality can be employed to classify the data generated with the other handpiece. We demonstrate that the correct classification rate of the models increases (+ 25%) with the introduction of a model based on peak lists that are tissue-specific and common to the two handpieces, compared with considering solely the whole molecular profile. This renders it possible to use a unique and universal database for quasi-instantaneous tissue recognition which would provide similar classification results independent of the handpiece used. Furthermore, the laser was able to generate aerosols rich in lipids from hard tissues such as bone, bone marrow, and cartilage. Combined, these results demonstrate that REIMS is a valuable and versatile tool for instantaneous identification/classification of hard tissue and coupling to different aerosol-generating handpieces expands its field of application. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-019-02148-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6920236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69202362019-12-30 Tissue classification by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS): comparison between a diathermic knife and CO(2) laser sampling on classification performance Genangeli, Michele Heeren, Ron M. A. Porta Siegel, Tiffany Anal Bioanal Chem Paper in Forefront The increasing need for rapid, in situ, and robust tissue profiling approaches in the context of intraoperative diagnostics has led to the development of a large number of ambient ionization-based surface sampling strategies. This paper compares the performances of a diathermic knife and a CO(2) laser handpiece, both clinically approved, coupled to a rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) source for quasi-instantaneous tissue classification. Several fresh meat samples (muscle, liver, bone, bone marrow, cartilage, skin, fat) were obtained from different animals. Overall, the laser produced cleaner cuts and more reproducible and higher spectral quality signals when compared with the diathermic knife (CV laser = 9–12%, CV diathermic = 14–23%). The molecular profiles were subsequently entered into a database and PCA/LDA classification/prediction models were built to assess if the data generated with one sampling modality can be employed to classify the data generated with the other handpiece. We demonstrate that the correct classification rate of the models increases (+ 25%) with the introduction of a model based on peak lists that are tissue-specific and common to the two handpieces, compared with considering solely the whole molecular profile. This renders it possible to use a unique and universal database for quasi-instantaneous tissue recognition which would provide similar classification results independent of the handpiece used. Furthermore, the laser was able to generate aerosols rich in lipids from hard tissues such as bone, bone marrow, and cartilage. Combined, these results demonstrate that REIMS is a valuable and versatile tool for instantaneous identification/classification of hard tissue and coupling to different aerosol-generating handpieces expands its field of application. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-019-02148-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-11-11 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6920236/ /pubmed/31713015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-02148-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Paper in Forefront Genangeli, Michele Heeren, Ron M. A. Porta Siegel, Tiffany Tissue classification by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS): comparison between a diathermic knife and CO(2) laser sampling on classification performance |
title | Tissue classification by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS): comparison between a diathermic knife and CO(2) laser sampling on classification performance |
title_full | Tissue classification by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS): comparison between a diathermic knife and CO(2) laser sampling on classification performance |
title_fullStr | Tissue classification by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS): comparison between a diathermic knife and CO(2) laser sampling on classification performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Tissue classification by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS): comparison between a diathermic knife and CO(2) laser sampling on classification performance |
title_short | Tissue classification by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS): comparison between a diathermic knife and CO(2) laser sampling on classification performance |
title_sort | tissue classification by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (reims): comparison between a diathermic knife and co(2) laser sampling on classification performance |
topic | Paper in Forefront |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31713015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-02148-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT genangelimichele tissueclassificationbyrapidevaporativeionizationmassspectrometryreimscomparisonbetweenadiathermicknifeandco2lasersamplingonclassificationperformance AT heerenronma tissueclassificationbyrapidevaporativeionizationmassspectrometryreimscomparisonbetweenadiathermicknifeandco2lasersamplingonclassificationperformance AT portasiegeltiffany tissueclassificationbyrapidevaporativeionizationmassspectrometryreimscomparisonbetweenadiathermicknifeandco2lasersamplingonclassificationperformance |