Cargando…

Ankle Home Stay Programme:- A review of ankle fracture management and costs at a busy district general hospital

INTRODUCTION: Patients suffering ankle fractures provide a common economic and time burden to modern healthcare in the UK. They continue to be admitted to await operative intervention and may have to wait days before an operation occurs. Unnecessary bed stay is one are that may be subject to cost sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khakha, Raghbir, Berber, Onur, Patel, Amit, Kurar, Langhit, James, Laurence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.07.020
_version_ 1783480969433448448
author Khakha, Raghbir
Berber, Onur
Patel, Amit
Kurar, Langhit
James, Laurence
author_facet Khakha, Raghbir
Berber, Onur
Patel, Amit
Kurar, Langhit
James, Laurence
author_sort Khakha, Raghbir
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients suffering ankle fractures provide a common economic and time burden to modern healthcare in the UK. They continue to be admitted to await operative intervention and may have to wait days before an operation occurs. Unnecessary bed stay is one are that may be subject to cost savings if the safety of the patient is maintained. PATIENT AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data on 23 patients over a four-month period identifying their admission status, length of stay, and time to operative intervention. We were able to cost analyse the patients journey from admission to discharge, postoperative intervention. We then instilled the Ankle Home Stay Programme, identifying patients safe to be discharged who were able to re-attend for their operation. Seventeen patients were enrolled in this and a subsequent cost-analysis was compared to the pre-intervention cohort. RESULTS: Pre Ankle Home Stay Programme demonstrated cost per patient of admitted patients to be £2690 and £1347 for patients managed in the outpatient setting. Implementation of the pathway maintained this cost saving with those in the outpatient setting costing £1781 per patient and those admitted costing £2855. CONCLUSIONS: Patients can be safely managed in the outpatient setting, with regular clinic review before formal operative intervention as opposed to blanket admission to an acute inpatient bed. This is cost saving in a healthcare system with finite resources focussed on improving use of economic resources. It also maintains patient care with select admission criteria onto the pathway and regular review to ensure standards are maintained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6920498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69204982019-12-27 Ankle Home Stay Programme:- A review of ankle fracture management and costs at a busy district general hospital Khakha, Raghbir Berber, Onur Patel, Amit Kurar, Langhit James, Laurence Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Patients suffering ankle fractures provide a common economic and time burden to modern healthcare in the UK. They continue to be admitted to await operative intervention and may have to wait days before an operation occurs. Unnecessary bed stay is one are that may be subject to cost savings if the safety of the patient is maintained. PATIENT AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data on 23 patients over a four-month period identifying their admission status, length of stay, and time to operative intervention. We were able to cost analyse the patients journey from admission to discharge, postoperative intervention. We then instilled the Ankle Home Stay Programme, identifying patients safe to be discharged who were able to re-attend for their operation. Seventeen patients were enrolled in this and a subsequent cost-analysis was compared to the pre-intervention cohort. RESULTS: Pre Ankle Home Stay Programme demonstrated cost per patient of admitted patients to be £2690 and £1347 for patients managed in the outpatient setting. Implementation of the pathway maintained this cost saving with those in the outpatient setting costing £1781 per patient and those admitted costing £2855. CONCLUSIONS: Patients can be safely managed in the outpatient setting, with regular clinic review before formal operative intervention as opposed to blanket admission to an acute inpatient bed. This is cost saving in a healthcare system with finite resources focussed on improving use of economic resources. It also maintains patient care with select admission criteria onto the pathway and regular review to ensure standards are maintained. Elsevier 2019-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6920498/ /pubmed/31885868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.07.020 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Khakha, Raghbir
Berber, Onur
Patel, Amit
Kurar, Langhit
James, Laurence
Ankle Home Stay Programme:- A review of ankle fracture management and costs at a busy district general hospital
title Ankle Home Stay Programme:- A review of ankle fracture management and costs at a busy district general hospital
title_full Ankle Home Stay Programme:- A review of ankle fracture management and costs at a busy district general hospital
title_fullStr Ankle Home Stay Programme:- A review of ankle fracture management and costs at a busy district general hospital
title_full_unstemmed Ankle Home Stay Programme:- A review of ankle fracture management and costs at a busy district general hospital
title_short Ankle Home Stay Programme:- A review of ankle fracture management and costs at a busy district general hospital
title_sort ankle home stay programme:- a review of ankle fracture management and costs at a busy district general hospital
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.07.020
work_keys_str_mv AT khakharaghbir anklehomestayprogrammeareviewofanklefracturemanagementandcostsatabusydistrictgeneralhospital
AT berberonur anklehomestayprogrammeareviewofanklefracturemanagementandcostsatabusydistrictgeneralhospital
AT patelamit anklehomestayprogrammeareviewofanklefracturemanagementandcostsatabusydistrictgeneralhospital
AT kurarlanghit anklehomestayprogrammeareviewofanklefracturemanagementandcostsatabusydistrictgeneralhospital
AT jameslaurence anklehomestayprogrammeareviewofanklefracturemanagementandcostsatabusydistrictgeneralhospital