Transumbilical enterostomy for Hirschsprung's disease with a two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through procedure

BACKGROUND: A one-stage laparoscopic operation has recently been considered a favorable option for the management of patients with Hirschsprung's disease (HD) due to its superior cosmetic results. One-stage transanal endorectal pull-through for the treatment of rectosigmoid HD has been widely used in newborns without complications. However, enterostomy is required in some HD cases for enterocolitis and dilated colon. Our transumbilical enterostomy (TUE) and two-stage laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty were effective and achieved a similar cosmetic effect to one-stage laparoscopy on the abdominal wall in patients with anorectal malformation, but the effect in patients with HD is unclear. AIM: To evaluate the safety, efficacy and cosmetic results of TUE in two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through for HD. METHODS: From June 2013 to June 2018, 53 patients (40 boys, 13 girls; mean age at enterostomy: 5.5 ± 2.2 mo) who underwent enterostomy and two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through for HD with stoma closure were reviewed at our institution. Two enterostomy approaches were used: TUE in 24 patients, and conventional abdominal enterostomy (CAE) in 29 patients. Eleven patients with rectosigmoid HD had severe preoperative enterocolitis or a dilated colon. 26 patients had long-segment HD, and 16 patients had total colonic aganglionosis (TCA). The patients with left-sided HD underwent the two-stage laparoscopic Soave procedure, and the patients with right-sided HD and TCA underwent the laparoscopic Duhamel procedure. Demographics, enterostomy operative time, complications and cosmetic results were respectively evaluated. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups with respect to gender, age at enterostomy, weight and clinical type (P > 0.05). No conversion to open technique was required. Two patients experienced episodes of stomal mucosal prolapse in the TUE group and 1 patient in the CAE group (8.33% vs 3.45%, P > 0.05). No parastomal hernia was observed in either of the two groups. Wound infection at the stoma was seen in 1 case in the TUE group, and 2 cases in the CAE group (4.17% vs 6.90%, P > 0.05). No obstruction was noted in any of the patients in the TUE group, whereas obstruction was found in 1 patient in the CAE group. Enterocolitis was observed in 3 and 5 patients in the TUE and CAE group, respectively (12.50% vs 17.24%, P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the TUE group and CAE group in terms of the incidence of soiling and constipation (P > 0.05). The cosmetic result using the scar score in the TUE group was better than that in the CAE group (6.83 ± 0.96 vs 13.32 ± 1.57, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TUE is a safe and feasible method for the treatment of HD, and the staged enterostomy and two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through achieved a similar cosmetic effect to the one-stage laparoscopic procedure.