Cargando…

A qualitative study on measuring patient‐centered care: Perspectives from clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient‐centered care (PCC) benefits patients, health‐care providers, and health‐care systems by providing delivery of care that addresses patient values and needs while improving provider experiences, and by decreasing health‐care expenditure. To improve PCC, health‐care system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Sadia, Djurkovic, Andrea, Manalili, Kimberly, Sahota, Balreen, Santana, Maria J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.140
_version_ 1783480991319326720
author Ahmed, Sadia
Djurkovic, Andrea
Manalili, Kimberly
Sahota, Balreen
Santana, Maria J.
author_facet Ahmed, Sadia
Djurkovic, Andrea
Manalili, Kimberly
Sahota, Balreen
Santana, Maria J.
author_sort Ahmed, Sadia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient‐centered care (PCC) benefits patients, health‐care providers, and health‐care systems by providing delivery of care that addresses patient values and needs while improving provider experiences, and by decreasing health‐care expenditure. To improve PCC, health‐care systems need to measure it. Recently, we developed a PCC framework that is evidence based and patient informed. The purpose of this study was to gather the perspective of clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts regarding the PCC domains included in the framework. Their perspectives were used to refine these domains, which ultimately will inform the development of PCC quality indicators. METHODS: Participants were recruited via expert and snowball sampling. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts from Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom from October 2017 to January 2018. With the use of an interview guide developed using the PCC framework, interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for a thematic analysis using NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Sixteen semi‐structured interviews were conducted, which included four clinician‐scientists and 12 quality improvement experts. Twelve of the participants were from Canada, three from the United Kingdom, and one from the United States. From the thematic analysis, three major themes were identified: (a) measurability of PCC, (b) practical considerations for implementing measurement, and (c) policy and practice implications. Participants discussed barriers and recommendations to improve and increase the clarity of the PCC domains in health system reporting, resulting in several future directions to refine and target specific PCC domains. CONCLUSION: Clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts provided key recommendations for the measurement of PCC. The perspectives of key stakeholders in PCC measurement will inform strategies for the implementation and uptake of patient‐centered quality indicators in health‐care systems. The views of these key experts can lay the foundation for the development of standardized measures of PCC, to ensure monitoring and improvement of PCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6920695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69206952019-12-30 A qualitative study on measuring patient‐centered care: Perspectives from clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts Ahmed, Sadia Djurkovic, Andrea Manalili, Kimberly Sahota, Balreen Santana, Maria J. Health Sci Rep Research Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient‐centered care (PCC) benefits patients, health‐care providers, and health‐care systems by providing delivery of care that addresses patient values and needs while improving provider experiences, and by decreasing health‐care expenditure. To improve PCC, health‐care systems need to measure it. Recently, we developed a PCC framework that is evidence based and patient informed. The purpose of this study was to gather the perspective of clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts regarding the PCC domains included in the framework. Their perspectives were used to refine these domains, which ultimately will inform the development of PCC quality indicators. METHODS: Participants were recruited via expert and snowball sampling. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts from Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom from October 2017 to January 2018. With the use of an interview guide developed using the PCC framework, interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for a thematic analysis using NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Sixteen semi‐structured interviews were conducted, which included four clinician‐scientists and 12 quality improvement experts. Twelve of the participants were from Canada, three from the United Kingdom, and one from the United States. From the thematic analysis, three major themes were identified: (a) measurability of PCC, (b) practical considerations for implementing measurement, and (c) policy and practice implications. Participants discussed barriers and recommendations to improve and increase the clarity of the PCC domains in health system reporting, resulting in several future directions to refine and target specific PCC domains. CONCLUSION: Clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts provided key recommendations for the measurement of PCC. The perspectives of key stakeholders in PCC measurement will inform strategies for the implementation and uptake of patient‐centered quality indicators in health‐care systems. The views of these key experts can lay the foundation for the development of standardized measures of PCC, to ensure monitoring and improvement of PCC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6920695/ /pubmed/31890898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.140 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Ahmed, Sadia
Djurkovic, Andrea
Manalili, Kimberly
Sahota, Balreen
Santana, Maria J.
A qualitative study on measuring patient‐centered care: Perspectives from clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts
title A qualitative study on measuring patient‐centered care: Perspectives from clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts
title_full A qualitative study on measuring patient‐centered care: Perspectives from clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts
title_fullStr A qualitative study on measuring patient‐centered care: Perspectives from clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study on measuring patient‐centered care: Perspectives from clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts
title_short A qualitative study on measuring patient‐centered care: Perspectives from clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts
title_sort qualitative study on measuring patient‐centered care: perspectives from clinician‐scientists and quality improvement experts
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.140
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedsadia aqualitativestudyonmeasuringpatientcenteredcareperspectivesfromclinicianscientistsandqualityimprovementexperts
AT djurkovicandrea aqualitativestudyonmeasuringpatientcenteredcareperspectivesfromclinicianscientistsandqualityimprovementexperts
AT manalilikimberly aqualitativestudyonmeasuringpatientcenteredcareperspectivesfromclinicianscientistsandqualityimprovementexperts
AT sahotabalreen aqualitativestudyonmeasuringpatientcenteredcareperspectivesfromclinicianscientistsandqualityimprovementexperts
AT santanamariaj aqualitativestudyonmeasuringpatientcenteredcareperspectivesfromclinicianscientistsandqualityimprovementexperts
AT ahmedsadia qualitativestudyonmeasuringpatientcenteredcareperspectivesfromclinicianscientistsandqualityimprovementexperts
AT djurkovicandrea qualitativestudyonmeasuringpatientcenteredcareperspectivesfromclinicianscientistsandqualityimprovementexperts
AT manalilikimberly qualitativestudyonmeasuringpatientcenteredcareperspectivesfromclinicianscientistsandqualityimprovementexperts
AT sahotabalreen qualitativestudyonmeasuringpatientcenteredcareperspectivesfromclinicianscientistsandqualityimprovementexperts
AT santanamariaj qualitativestudyonmeasuringpatientcenteredcareperspectivesfromclinicianscientistsandqualityimprovementexperts