Cargando…

Predictive quantitative ultrasound radiomic markers associated with treatment response in head and neck cancer

AIM: We aimed to identify quantitative ultrasound (QUS)-radiomic markers to predict radiotherapy response in metastatic lymph nodes of head and neck cancer. MATERIALS & METHODS: Node-positive head and neck cancer patients underwent pretreatment QUS imaging of their metastatic lymph nodes. Imagin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, William T, Suraweera, Harini, Quaioit, Karina, Cardenas, Daniel, Leong, Kai X, Karam, Irene, Poon, Ian, Jang, Deok, Sannachi, Lakshmanan, Gangeh, Mehrdad, Tabbarah, Sami, Lagree, Andrew, Sadeghi-Naini, Ali, Czarnota, Gregory J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Future Science Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915534
http://dx.doi.org/10.2144/fsoa-2019-0048
_version_ 1783481000868708352
author Tran, William T
Suraweera, Harini
Quaioit, Karina
Cardenas, Daniel
Leong, Kai X
Karam, Irene
Poon, Ian
Jang, Deok
Sannachi, Lakshmanan
Gangeh, Mehrdad
Tabbarah, Sami
Lagree, Andrew
Sadeghi-Naini, Ali
Czarnota, Gregory J
author_facet Tran, William T
Suraweera, Harini
Quaioit, Karina
Cardenas, Daniel
Leong, Kai X
Karam, Irene
Poon, Ian
Jang, Deok
Sannachi, Lakshmanan
Gangeh, Mehrdad
Tabbarah, Sami
Lagree, Andrew
Sadeghi-Naini, Ali
Czarnota, Gregory J
author_sort Tran, William T
collection PubMed
description AIM: We aimed to identify quantitative ultrasound (QUS)-radiomic markers to predict radiotherapy response in metastatic lymph nodes of head and neck cancer. MATERIALS & METHODS: Node-positive head and neck cancer patients underwent pretreatment QUS imaging of their metastatic lymph nodes. Imaging features were extracted using the QUS spectral form, and second-order texture parameters. Machine-learning classifiers were used for predictive modeling, which included a logistic regression, naive Bayes, and k-nearest neighbor classifiers. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the pretreatment QUS-radiomic parameters between radiological complete responders versus partial responders (p < 0.05). The univariable model that demonstrated the greatest classification accuracy included: spectral intercept (SI)-contrast (area under the curve = 0.741). Multivariable models were also computed and showed that the SI-contrast + SI-homogeneity demonstrated an area under the curve = 0.870. The three-feature model demonstrated that the spectral slope-correlation + SI-contrast + SI-homogeneity-predicted response with accuracy of 87.5%. CONCLUSION: Multivariable QUS-radiomic features of metastatic lymph nodes can predict treatment response a priori.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6920736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Future Science Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69207362020-01-08 Predictive quantitative ultrasound radiomic markers associated with treatment response in head and neck cancer Tran, William T Suraweera, Harini Quaioit, Karina Cardenas, Daniel Leong, Kai X Karam, Irene Poon, Ian Jang, Deok Sannachi, Lakshmanan Gangeh, Mehrdad Tabbarah, Sami Lagree, Andrew Sadeghi-Naini, Ali Czarnota, Gregory J Future Sci OA Research Article AIM: We aimed to identify quantitative ultrasound (QUS)-radiomic markers to predict radiotherapy response in metastatic lymph nodes of head and neck cancer. MATERIALS & METHODS: Node-positive head and neck cancer patients underwent pretreatment QUS imaging of their metastatic lymph nodes. Imaging features were extracted using the QUS spectral form, and second-order texture parameters. Machine-learning classifiers were used for predictive modeling, which included a logistic regression, naive Bayes, and k-nearest neighbor classifiers. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the pretreatment QUS-radiomic parameters between radiological complete responders versus partial responders (p < 0.05). The univariable model that demonstrated the greatest classification accuracy included: spectral intercept (SI)-contrast (area under the curve = 0.741). Multivariable models were also computed and showed that the SI-contrast + SI-homogeneity demonstrated an area under the curve = 0.870. The three-feature model demonstrated that the spectral slope-correlation + SI-contrast + SI-homogeneity-predicted response with accuracy of 87.5%. CONCLUSION: Multivariable QUS-radiomic features of metastatic lymph nodes can predict treatment response a priori. Future Science Ltd 2019-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6920736/ /pubmed/31915534 http://dx.doi.org/10.2144/fsoa-2019-0048 Text en © 2019 Gregory J Czarnota This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research Article
Tran, William T
Suraweera, Harini
Quaioit, Karina
Cardenas, Daniel
Leong, Kai X
Karam, Irene
Poon, Ian
Jang, Deok
Sannachi, Lakshmanan
Gangeh, Mehrdad
Tabbarah, Sami
Lagree, Andrew
Sadeghi-Naini, Ali
Czarnota, Gregory J
Predictive quantitative ultrasound radiomic markers associated with treatment response in head and neck cancer
title Predictive quantitative ultrasound radiomic markers associated with treatment response in head and neck cancer
title_full Predictive quantitative ultrasound radiomic markers associated with treatment response in head and neck cancer
title_fullStr Predictive quantitative ultrasound radiomic markers associated with treatment response in head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Predictive quantitative ultrasound radiomic markers associated with treatment response in head and neck cancer
title_short Predictive quantitative ultrasound radiomic markers associated with treatment response in head and neck cancer
title_sort predictive quantitative ultrasound radiomic markers associated with treatment response in head and neck cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915534
http://dx.doi.org/10.2144/fsoa-2019-0048
work_keys_str_mv AT tranwilliamt predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT suraweeraharini predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT quaioitkarina predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT cardenasdaniel predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT leongkaix predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT karamirene predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT poonian predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT jangdeok predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT sannachilakshmanan predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT gangehmehrdad predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT tabbarahsami predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT lagreeandrew predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT sadeghinainiali predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer
AT czarnotagregoryj predictivequantitativeultrasoundradiomicmarkersassociatedwithtreatmentresponseinheadandneckcancer