Cargando…

Molecular Dynamics Simulations Suggest a Non-Doublet Decoding Model of −1 Frameshifting by tRNA(Ser3)

In-frame decoding in the ribosome occurs through canonical or wobble Watson–Crick pairing of three mRNA codon bases (a triplet) with a triplet of anticodon bases in tRNA. Departures from the triplet–triplet interaction can result in frameshifting, meaning downstream mRNA codons are then read in a di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caulfield, Thomas, Coban, Matt, Tek, Alex, Flores, Samuel Coulbourn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom9110745
_version_ 1783481028644438016
author Caulfield, Thomas
Coban, Matt
Tek, Alex
Flores, Samuel Coulbourn
author_facet Caulfield, Thomas
Coban, Matt
Tek, Alex
Flores, Samuel Coulbourn
author_sort Caulfield, Thomas
collection PubMed
description In-frame decoding in the ribosome occurs through canonical or wobble Watson–Crick pairing of three mRNA codon bases (a triplet) with a triplet of anticodon bases in tRNA. Departures from the triplet–triplet interaction can result in frameshifting, meaning downstream mRNA codons are then read in a different register. There are many mechanisms to induce frameshifting, and most are insufficiently understood. One previously proposed mechanism is doublet decoding, in which only codon bases 1 and 2 are read by anticodon bases 34 and 35, which would lead to −1 frameshifting. In E. coli, tRNA(Ser3)(GCU) can induce −1 frameshifting at alanine (GCA) codons. The logic of the doublet decoding model is that the Ala codon’s GC could pair with the tRNA(Ser3′)s GC, leaving the third anticodon residue U36 making no interactions with mRNA. Under that model, a U36C mutation would still induce −1 frameshifting, but experiments refute this. We perform all-atom simulations of wild-type tRNA(Ser3), as well as a U36C mutant. Our simulations revealed a hydrogen bond between U36 of the anticodon and G1 of the codon. The U36C mutant cannot make this interaction, as it lacks the hydrogen-bond-donating H3. The simulation thus suggests a novel, non-doublet decoding mechanism for −1 frameshifting by tRNA(Ser3) at Ala codons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6920855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69208552019-12-24 Molecular Dynamics Simulations Suggest a Non-Doublet Decoding Model of −1 Frameshifting by tRNA(Ser3) Caulfield, Thomas Coban, Matt Tek, Alex Flores, Samuel Coulbourn Biomolecules Article In-frame decoding in the ribosome occurs through canonical or wobble Watson–Crick pairing of three mRNA codon bases (a triplet) with a triplet of anticodon bases in tRNA. Departures from the triplet–triplet interaction can result in frameshifting, meaning downstream mRNA codons are then read in a different register. There are many mechanisms to induce frameshifting, and most are insufficiently understood. One previously proposed mechanism is doublet decoding, in which only codon bases 1 and 2 are read by anticodon bases 34 and 35, which would lead to −1 frameshifting. In E. coli, tRNA(Ser3)(GCU) can induce −1 frameshifting at alanine (GCA) codons. The logic of the doublet decoding model is that the Ala codon’s GC could pair with the tRNA(Ser3′)s GC, leaving the third anticodon residue U36 making no interactions with mRNA. Under that model, a U36C mutation would still induce −1 frameshifting, but experiments refute this. We perform all-atom simulations of wild-type tRNA(Ser3), as well as a U36C mutant. Our simulations revealed a hydrogen bond between U36 of the anticodon and G1 of the codon. The U36C mutant cannot make this interaction, as it lacks the hydrogen-bond-donating H3. The simulation thus suggests a novel, non-doublet decoding mechanism for −1 frameshifting by tRNA(Ser3) at Ala codons. MDPI 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6920855/ /pubmed/31752208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom9110745 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Caulfield, Thomas
Coban, Matt
Tek, Alex
Flores, Samuel Coulbourn
Molecular Dynamics Simulations Suggest a Non-Doublet Decoding Model of −1 Frameshifting by tRNA(Ser3)
title Molecular Dynamics Simulations Suggest a Non-Doublet Decoding Model of −1 Frameshifting by tRNA(Ser3)
title_full Molecular Dynamics Simulations Suggest a Non-Doublet Decoding Model of −1 Frameshifting by tRNA(Ser3)
title_fullStr Molecular Dynamics Simulations Suggest a Non-Doublet Decoding Model of −1 Frameshifting by tRNA(Ser3)
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Dynamics Simulations Suggest a Non-Doublet Decoding Model of −1 Frameshifting by tRNA(Ser3)
title_short Molecular Dynamics Simulations Suggest a Non-Doublet Decoding Model of −1 Frameshifting by tRNA(Ser3)
title_sort molecular dynamics simulations suggest a non-doublet decoding model of −1 frameshifting by trna(ser3)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6920855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom9110745
work_keys_str_mv AT caulfieldthomas moleculardynamicssimulationssuggestanondoubletdecodingmodelof1frameshiftingbytrnaser3
AT cobanmatt moleculardynamicssimulationssuggestanondoubletdecodingmodelof1frameshiftingbytrnaser3
AT tekalex moleculardynamicssimulationssuggestanondoubletdecodingmodelof1frameshiftingbytrnaser3
AT floressamuelcoulbourn moleculardynamicssimulationssuggestanondoubletdecodingmodelof1frameshiftingbytrnaser3