Cargando…

Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster(®) versus Fastrach(®) LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: BlockBuster(®) Laryngeal Mask Airway, a newer supraglottic airway device, is claimed to be an efficient conduit for endotracheal intubation. Intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is an established device for the same. This randomised study was undertaken to evaluate the success...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Endigeri, Archana, Ganeshnavar, Anilkumar, Varaprasad, BVS, Shivanand, YH, Ayyangouda, Basavaraja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6921324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31879422
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_396_19
_version_ 1783481135665250304
author Endigeri, Archana
Ganeshnavar, Anilkumar
Varaprasad, BVS
Shivanand, YH
Ayyangouda, Basavaraja
author_facet Endigeri, Archana
Ganeshnavar, Anilkumar
Varaprasad, BVS
Shivanand, YH
Ayyangouda, Basavaraja
author_sort Endigeri, Archana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: BlockBuster(®) Laryngeal Mask Airway, a newer supraglottic airway device, is claimed to be an efficient conduit for endotracheal intubation. Intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is an established device for the same. This randomised study was undertaken to evaluate the success rate of blind intubation using either of these LMAs. METHODS: Sixty patients of age group 20-60 years undergoing general anaesthesia were randomised in 2 groups, of 30 patients each, for tracheal intubation using either BlockBuster(®) LMA (Group B) or the Intubating LMA Fastrach(®) (Group F). After induction of anaesthesia, LMAs were inserted and on achieving adequate ventilation with the device, fibreoptic scopy was performed to assess the glottis visualisation score. Blind intubation was attempted through the supraglottic airway devices (SAD). The primary objective was first pass successful intubation and secondary outcomes were ease, time for LMA insertion, oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP), LMA removal time, fibreoptic scoring and complications. Data was analysed using SPSS V22 software. RESULTS: The first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation was 90% in Group B and 66.6% in Group F (P = 0.028), while the overall success rate of intubation was 96.6% in Group B and 89.9% in Group F (P = 0.3). The OSP in Group B was 33.7 ± 1.8 and 22.7 ± 1.5 cm H(2)O in Group F (P = 0.001). Complications such as sore throat and blood stain were reduced with BlockBuster(®) LMA. CONCLUSION: BlockBuster(®) LMA provides higher first pass success rate of blind tracheal intubation with less complications like sore throat and blood staining.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6921324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69213242019-12-26 Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster(®) versus Fastrach(®) LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial Endigeri, Archana Ganeshnavar, Anilkumar Varaprasad, BVS Shivanand, YH Ayyangouda, Basavaraja Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: BlockBuster(®) Laryngeal Mask Airway, a newer supraglottic airway device, is claimed to be an efficient conduit for endotracheal intubation. Intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is an established device for the same. This randomised study was undertaken to evaluate the success rate of blind intubation using either of these LMAs. METHODS: Sixty patients of age group 20-60 years undergoing general anaesthesia were randomised in 2 groups, of 30 patients each, for tracheal intubation using either BlockBuster(®) LMA (Group B) or the Intubating LMA Fastrach(®) (Group F). After induction of anaesthesia, LMAs were inserted and on achieving adequate ventilation with the device, fibreoptic scopy was performed to assess the glottis visualisation score. Blind intubation was attempted through the supraglottic airway devices (SAD). The primary objective was first pass successful intubation and secondary outcomes were ease, time for LMA insertion, oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP), LMA removal time, fibreoptic scoring and complications. Data was analysed using SPSS V22 software. RESULTS: The first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation was 90% in Group B and 66.6% in Group F (P = 0.028), while the overall success rate of intubation was 96.6% in Group B and 89.9% in Group F (P = 0.3). The OSP in Group B was 33.7 ± 1.8 and 22.7 ± 1.5 cm H(2)O in Group F (P = 0.001). Complications such as sore throat and blood stain were reduced with BlockBuster(®) LMA. CONCLUSION: BlockBuster(®) LMA provides higher first pass success rate of blind tracheal intubation with less complications like sore throat and blood staining. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-12 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6921324/ /pubmed/31879422 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_396_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Endigeri, Archana
Ganeshnavar, Anilkumar
Varaprasad, BVS
Shivanand, YH
Ayyangouda, Basavaraja
Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster(®) versus Fastrach(®) LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial
title Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster(®) versus Fastrach(®) LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial
title_full Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster(®) versus Fastrach(®) LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial
title_fullStr Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster(®) versus Fastrach(®) LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster(®) versus Fastrach(®) LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial
title_short Comparison of success rate of BlockBuster(®) versus Fastrach(®) LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial
title_sort comparison of success rate of blockbuster(®) versus fastrach(®) lma as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: a prospective randomised trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6921324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31879422
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_396_19
work_keys_str_mv AT endigeriarchana comparisonofsuccessrateofblockbusterversusfastrachlmaasconduitforblindendotrachealintubationaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT ganeshnavaranilkumar comparisonofsuccessrateofblockbusterversusfastrachlmaasconduitforblindendotrachealintubationaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT varaprasadbvs comparisonofsuccessrateofblockbusterversusfastrachlmaasconduitforblindendotrachealintubationaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT shivanandyh comparisonofsuccessrateofblockbusterversusfastrachlmaasconduitforblindendotrachealintubationaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT ayyangoudabasavaraja comparisonofsuccessrateofblockbusterversusfastrachlmaasconduitforblindendotrachealintubationaprospectiverandomisedtrial