Cargando…

Age-associated sperm DNA methylation patterns do not directly persist trans-generationally

BACKGROUND: The impact of aging on the sperm methylome is well understood. However, the direct, subsequent impact on offspring and the role of altered sperm DNA methylation alterations in this process remain poorly understood. The well-defined impact of aging on sperm DNA methylation represents an e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenkins, Timothy G., James, Emma R., Aston, Kenneth I., Salas-Huetos, Albert, Pastuszak, Alexander W., Smith, Ken R., Hanson, Heidi A., Hotaling, James M., Carrell, Douglas T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6921445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-019-0323-4
_version_ 1783481163881381888
author Jenkins, Timothy G.
James, Emma R.
Aston, Kenneth I.
Salas-Huetos, Albert
Pastuszak, Alexander W.
Smith, Ken R.
Hanson, Heidi A.
Hotaling, James M.
Carrell, Douglas T.
author_facet Jenkins, Timothy G.
James, Emma R.
Aston, Kenneth I.
Salas-Huetos, Albert
Pastuszak, Alexander W.
Smith, Ken R.
Hanson, Heidi A.
Hotaling, James M.
Carrell, Douglas T.
author_sort Jenkins, Timothy G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of aging on the sperm methylome is well understood. However, the direct, subsequent impact on offspring and the role of altered sperm DNA methylation alterations in this process remain poorly understood. The well-defined impact of aging on sperm DNA methylation represents an excellent opportunity to trace the direct, transgenerational transmission of these signals. RESULTS: We utilized the Illumina MethylationEPIC array to analyze the sperm of 16 patients with older (> 40 years of age) paternal grandfathers (‘old grand paternal age’ patients; OGPA) and 16 patients with younger (< 25 years of age) grandfathers (‘young grand paternal age’ patients; YGPA) identified through the Subfertility Health Assisted Reproduction and the Environment (SHARE) cohort to investigate differences in DNA methylation. No differentially methylated regions were identified between the OGPA and YGPA groups. Further, when assessing only the sites previously shown to be altered by age, no statistically significant differences between OGPA and YGPA were identified. This was true even despite the lower bar for significance after removing multiple comparison correction in a targeted approach. Interestingly though, in an analysis of the 140 loci known to have decreased methylation with age, the majority (~ 72%) had lower methylation in OGPA compared to YGPA though the differences were extremely small (~ 1.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the robust and consistent age-associated methylation alterations seen in human sperm are ‘reset’ during large-scale epigenetic reprograming processes and are not directly inherited trans-generationally (over two generations). An extremely small trend was present between the YGPA and OGPA groups that resemble the aging pattern in older sperm. However, this trend was not significant and was so small that, if real, is almost certainly biologically inert.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6921445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69214452019-12-30 Age-associated sperm DNA methylation patterns do not directly persist trans-generationally Jenkins, Timothy G. James, Emma R. Aston, Kenneth I. Salas-Huetos, Albert Pastuszak, Alexander W. Smith, Ken R. Hanson, Heidi A. Hotaling, James M. Carrell, Douglas T. Epigenetics Chromatin Research BACKGROUND: The impact of aging on the sperm methylome is well understood. However, the direct, subsequent impact on offspring and the role of altered sperm DNA methylation alterations in this process remain poorly understood. The well-defined impact of aging on sperm DNA methylation represents an excellent opportunity to trace the direct, transgenerational transmission of these signals. RESULTS: We utilized the Illumina MethylationEPIC array to analyze the sperm of 16 patients with older (> 40 years of age) paternal grandfathers (‘old grand paternal age’ patients; OGPA) and 16 patients with younger (< 25 years of age) grandfathers (‘young grand paternal age’ patients; YGPA) identified through the Subfertility Health Assisted Reproduction and the Environment (SHARE) cohort to investigate differences in DNA methylation. No differentially methylated regions were identified between the OGPA and YGPA groups. Further, when assessing only the sites previously shown to be altered by age, no statistically significant differences between OGPA and YGPA were identified. This was true even despite the lower bar for significance after removing multiple comparison correction in a targeted approach. Interestingly though, in an analysis of the 140 loci known to have decreased methylation with age, the majority (~ 72%) had lower methylation in OGPA compared to YGPA though the differences were extremely small (~ 1.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the robust and consistent age-associated methylation alterations seen in human sperm are ‘reset’ during large-scale epigenetic reprograming processes and are not directly inherited trans-generationally (over two generations). An extremely small trend was present between the YGPA and OGPA groups that resemble the aging pattern in older sperm. However, this trend was not significant and was so small that, if real, is almost certainly biologically inert. BioMed Central 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6921445/ /pubmed/31856899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-019-0323-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jenkins, Timothy G.
James, Emma R.
Aston, Kenneth I.
Salas-Huetos, Albert
Pastuszak, Alexander W.
Smith, Ken R.
Hanson, Heidi A.
Hotaling, James M.
Carrell, Douglas T.
Age-associated sperm DNA methylation patterns do not directly persist trans-generationally
title Age-associated sperm DNA methylation patterns do not directly persist trans-generationally
title_full Age-associated sperm DNA methylation patterns do not directly persist trans-generationally
title_fullStr Age-associated sperm DNA methylation patterns do not directly persist trans-generationally
title_full_unstemmed Age-associated sperm DNA methylation patterns do not directly persist trans-generationally
title_short Age-associated sperm DNA methylation patterns do not directly persist trans-generationally
title_sort age-associated sperm dna methylation patterns do not directly persist trans-generationally
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6921445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-019-0323-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jenkinstimothyg ageassociatedspermdnamethylationpatternsdonotdirectlypersisttransgenerationally
AT jamesemmar ageassociatedspermdnamethylationpatternsdonotdirectlypersisttransgenerationally
AT astonkennethi ageassociatedspermdnamethylationpatternsdonotdirectlypersisttransgenerationally
AT salashuetosalbert ageassociatedspermdnamethylationpatternsdonotdirectlypersisttransgenerationally
AT pastuszakalexanderw ageassociatedspermdnamethylationpatternsdonotdirectlypersisttransgenerationally
AT smithkenr ageassociatedspermdnamethylationpatternsdonotdirectlypersisttransgenerationally
AT hansonheidia ageassociatedspermdnamethylationpatternsdonotdirectlypersisttransgenerationally
AT hotalingjamesm ageassociatedspermdnamethylationpatternsdonotdirectlypersisttransgenerationally
AT carrelldouglast ageassociatedspermdnamethylationpatternsdonotdirectlypersisttransgenerationally