Cargando…
Outcomes of adhesion barriers in gynecologic surgeries: A retrospective study at a medical center
During second-look surgery or hospitalization, intra-abdominal surgeries may cause severe postoperative complications, such as pelvic adhesion, postoperative ileus, and severe pain. However, only few studies have analyzed the outcomes of antiadhesive barriers in second-look surgery. This retrospecti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6922485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31852155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018391 |
_version_ | 1783481350792151040 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Ci Ding, Dah-Ching |
author_facet | Huang, Ci Ding, Dah-Ching |
author_sort | Huang, Ci |
collection | PubMed |
description | During second-look surgery or hospitalization, intra-abdominal surgeries may cause severe postoperative complications, such as pelvic adhesion, postoperative ileus, and severe pain. However, only few studies have analyzed the outcomes of antiadhesive barriers in second-look surgery. This retrospective study aims to identify the outcomes of different antiadhesive barriers by analyzing surgical images. The study included patients who received an adhesion barrier during second-look surgery between January 2011 and November 2017. Four brands of adhesive barriers were used: Interceed, Seprafilm, Adept, and SurgiWrap. Adhesion scores were calculated for four quadrants of the uterus and surrounding structures before and after the use of antiadhesive barriers. The differences between the data of 2 observers and surgery times were also determined. A total of 18 patients were enrolled in the study. The adhesion scores were not significantly different before and after the placement of antiadhesive barriers. The difference in the adhesion scores between the two observers was also not significant, except in the Seprafilm group (P = .029). Furthermore, no significant change in the adhesion scores was observed between the first and second surgeries. Therefore, using adhesion barriers may not decrease the adhesion scores in the current setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6922485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69224852020-01-23 Outcomes of adhesion barriers in gynecologic surgeries: A retrospective study at a medical center Huang, Ci Ding, Dah-Ching Medicine (Baltimore) 5600 During second-look surgery or hospitalization, intra-abdominal surgeries may cause severe postoperative complications, such as pelvic adhesion, postoperative ileus, and severe pain. However, only few studies have analyzed the outcomes of antiadhesive barriers in second-look surgery. This retrospective study aims to identify the outcomes of different antiadhesive barriers by analyzing surgical images. The study included patients who received an adhesion barrier during second-look surgery between January 2011 and November 2017. Four brands of adhesive barriers were used: Interceed, Seprafilm, Adept, and SurgiWrap. Adhesion scores were calculated for four quadrants of the uterus and surrounding structures before and after the use of antiadhesive barriers. The differences between the data of 2 observers and surgery times were also determined. A total of 18 patients were enrolled in the study. The adhesion scores were not significantly different before and after the placement of antiadhesive barriers. The difference in the adhesion scores between the two observers was also not significant, except in the Seprafilm group (P = .029). Furthermore, no significant change in the adhesion scores was observed between the first and second surgeries. Therefore, using adhesion barriers may not decrease the adhesion scores in the current setting. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6922485/ /pubmed/31852155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018391 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5600 Huang, Ci Ding, Dah-Ching Outcomes of adhesion barriers in gynecologic surgeries: A retrospective study at a medical center |
title | Outcomes of adhesion barriers in gynecologic surgeries: A retrospective study at a medical center |
title_full | Outcomes of adhesion barriers in gynecologic surgeries: A retrospective study at a medical center |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of adhesion barriers in gynecologic surgeries: A retrospective study at a medical center |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of adhesion barriers in gynecologic surgeries: A retrospective study at a medical center |
title_short | Outcomes of adhesion barriers in gynecologic surgeries: A retrospective study at a medical center |
title_sort | outcomes of adhesion barriers in gynecologic surgeries: a retrospective study at a medical center |
topic | 5600 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6922485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31852155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018391 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangci outcomesofadhesionbarriersingynecologicsurgeriesaretrospectivestudyatamedicalcenter AT dingdahching outcomesofadhesionbarriersingynecologicsurgeriesaretrospectivestudyatamedicalcenter |