Cargando…

The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most effective therapies for coronary artery disease, but stent restenosis remains an important clinical challenge. The studies about the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis were limited. The purpose was to identify th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Long, Cui, Qian-Wei, Liu, Dan-Ping, Fu, Ying-Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6922542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31852115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018312
_version_ 1783481363433783296
author Tang, Long
Cui, Qian-Wei
Liu, Dan-Ping
Fu, Ying-Ying
author_facet Tang, Long
Cui, Qian-Wei
Liu, Dan-Ping
Fu, Ying-Ying
author_sort Tang, Long
collection PubMed
description Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most effective therapies for coronary artery disease, but stent restenosis remains an important clinical challenge. The studies about the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis were limited. The purpose was to identify the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis. A retrospective cohort study of data reuse. From July 2009 to August 2011, a total of 2338 cases met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The univariate analysis showed that the number of stents was a risk of stent restenosis, the OR value was 1.30 (95% CI:1.15 to 1.47, P < .001). The multi-factor regression analysis also showed that the number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis, the adjusted OR value was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.66, P < .001).Compared with 1–2 stents, the adjusted OR values of 3–5 stents and more than 6 stents were respectively 2.20 (95% CI: 1.24 to 3.90, P = .007) and 5.33 (95% CI: 1.89 to 15.08, P = .002), and the trend adjusted OR values was 2.26 (95% CI: 1.43 to 3.59, P < .001).The subgroup analysis of multi-factor regression analysis showed that when patients with the following conditions: 50 < Age, female, non-DES or SES, the risk of stent restenosis increased obviously. The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing PCI, especially for patients with the following conditions: 2<the number of stents, 50 < age, female, Non-DES (Drug-eluting stents) or SES (sirolimus-eluting stent).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6922542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69225422020-01-23 The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention Tang, Long Cui, Qian-Wei Liu, Dan-Ping Fu, Ying-Ying Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most effective therapies for coronary artery disease, but stent restenosis remains an important clinical challenge. The studies about the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis were limited. The purpose was to identify the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis. A retrospective cohort study of data reuse. From July 2009 to August 2011, a total of 2338 cases met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The univariate analysis showed that the number of stents was a risk of stent restenosis, the OR value was 1.30 (95% CI:1.15 to 1.47, P < .001). The multi-factor regression analysis also showed that the number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis, the adjusted OR value was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.66, P < .001).Compared with 1–2 stents, the adjusted OR values of 3–5 stents and more than 6 stents were respectively 2.20 (95% CI: 1.24 to 3.90, P = .007) and 5.33 (95% CI: 1.89 to 15.08, P = .002), and the trend adjusted OR values was 2.26 (95% CI: 1.43 to 3.59, P < .001).The subgroup analysis of multi-factor regression analysis showed that when patients with the following conditions: 50 < Age, female, non-DES or SES, the risk of stent restenosis increased obviously. The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing PCI, especially for patients with the following conditions: 2<the number of stents, 50 < age, female, Non-DES (Drug-eluting stents) or SES (sirolimus-eluting stent). Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6922542/ /pubmed/31852115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018312 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 3400
Tang, Long
Cui, Qian-Wei
Liu, Dan-Ping
Fu, Ying-Ying
The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
title The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
title_fullStr The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full_unstemmed The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
title_short The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
title_sort number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
topic 3400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6922542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31852115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018312
work_keys_str_mv AT tanglong thenumberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT cuiqianwei thenumberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT liudanping thenumberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT fuyingying thenumberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT tanglong numberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT cuiqianwei numberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT liudanping numberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT fuyingying numberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention