Cargando…
The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most effective therapies for coronary artery disease, but stent restenosis remains an important clinical challenge. The studies about the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis were limited. The purpose was to identify th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6922542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31852115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018312 |
_version_ | 1783481363433783296 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Long Cui, Qian-Wei Liu, Dan-Ping Fu, Ying-Ying |
author_facet | Tang, Long Cui, Qian-Wei Liu, Dan-Ping Fu, Ying-Ying |
author_sort | Tang, Long |
collection | PubMed |
description | Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most effective therapies for coronary artery disease, but stent restenosis remains an important clinical challenge. The studies about the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis were limited. The purpose was to identify the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis. A retrospective cohort study of data reuse. From July 2009 to August 2011, a total of 2338 cases met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The univariate analysis showed that the number of stents was a risk of stent restenosis, the OR value was 1.30 (95% CI:1.15 to 1.47, P < .001). The multi-factor regression analysis also showed that the number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis, the adjusted OR value was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.66, P < .001).Compared with 1–2 stents, the adjusted OR values of 3–5 stents and more than 6 stents were respectively 2.20 (95% CI: 1.24 to 3.90, P = .007) and 5.33 (95% CI: 1.89 to 15.08, P = .002), and the trend adjusted OR values was 2.26 (95% CI: 1.43 to 3.59, P < .001).The subgroup analysis of multi-factor regression analysis showed that when patients with the following conditions: 50 < Age, female, non-DES or SES, the risk of stent restenosis increased obviously. The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing PCI, especially for patients with the following conditions: 2<the number of stents, 50 < age, female, Non-DES (Drug-eluting stents) or SES (sirolimus-eluting stent). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6922542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69225422020-01-23 The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention Tang, Long Cui, Qian-Wei Liu, Dan-Ping Fu, Ying-Ying Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most effective therapies for coronary artery disease, but stent restenosis remains an important clinical challenge. The studies about the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis were limited. The purpose was to identify the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis. A retrospective cohort study of data reuse. From July 2009 to August 2011, a total of 2338 cases met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The univariate analysis showed that the number of stents was a risk of stent restenosis, the OR value was 1.30 (95% CI:1.15 to 1.47, P < .001). The multi-factor regression analysis also showed that the number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis, the adjusted OR value was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.66, P < .001).Compared with 1–2 stents, the adjusted OR values of 3–5 stents and more than 6 stents were respectively 2.20 (95% CI: 1.24 to 3.90, P = .007) and 5.33 (95% CI: 1.89 to 15.08, P = .002), and the trend adjusted OR values was 2.26 (95% CI: 1.43 to 3.59, P < .001).The subgroup analysis of multi-factor regression analysis showed that when patients with the following conditions: 50 < Age, female, non-DES or SES, the risk of stent restenosis increased obviously. The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing PCI, especially for patients with the following conditions: 2<the number of stents, 50 < age, female, Non-DES (Drug-eluting stents) or SES (sirolimus-eluting stent). Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6922542/ /pubmed/31852115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018312 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3400 Tang, Long Cui, Qian-Wei Liu, Dan-Ping Fu, Ying-Ying The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention |
title | The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_full | The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_fullStr | The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_short | The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_sort | number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention |
topic | 3400 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6922542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31852115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanglong thenumberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT cuiqianwei thenumberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT liudanping thenumberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT fuyingying thenumberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT tanglong numberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT cuiqianwei numberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT liudanping numberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT fuyingying numberofstentswasanindependentriskofstentrestenosisinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention |